Jennifer M Zerbato1, Georges Khoury2, Wei Zhao1, Matthew J Gartner3, Rachel D Pascoe1, Ajantha Rhodes1, Ashanti Dantanarayana1, Megan Gooey4, Jenny Anderson1, Peter Bacchetti5, Steven G Deeks6, James McMahon7, Michael Roche8, Thomas A Rasmussen1, Damian Fj Purcell2, Sharon R Lewin9. 1. Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia. 2. Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia. 3. School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. 4. HIV Characterisation Laboratory, Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, Division of HIV/AIDS, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA. 7. Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 8. Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia; School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. 9. Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: sharon.lewin@unimelb.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One strategy being pursued to clear latently infected cells that persist in people living with HIV (PLWH) on antiretroviral therapy (ART) is to activate latent HIV infection with a latency reversing agent (LRA). Surrogate markers that accurately measure virus production following an LRA are needed. METHODS: We quantified cell-associated unspliced (US), multiply spliced (MS) and supernatant (SN) HIV RNA by qPCR from total and resting CD4+ T cells isolated from seven PLWH on ART before and after treatment ex vivo with different LRAs, including histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi). MS and plasma HIV RNA were also quantified from PLWH on ART (n-11) who received the HDACi panobinostat. FINDINGS: In total and resting CD4+ T cells from PLWH on ART, detection of US RNA was common while detection of MS RNA was infrequent. Primers used to detect MS RNA, in contrast to US RNA, bound sites of the viral genome that are commonly mutated or deleted in PLWH on ART. Following ex vivo stimulation with LRAs, we identified a strong correlation between the fold change increase in SN and MS RNA, but not the fold change increase in SN and US RNA. In PLWH on ART who received panobinostat, MS RNA was significantly higher in samples with detectable compared to non0detectable plasma HIV RNA. INTERPRETATION: Following administration of an LRA, quantification of MS RNA is more likely to reflect an increase in virion production and is therefore a better indicator of meaningful latency reversal. FUNDING: NHMRC, NIH DARE collaboratory.
BACKGROUND: One strategy being pursued to clear latently infected cells that persist in people living with HIV (PLWH) on antiretroviral therapy (ART) is to activate latent HIV infection with a latency reversing agent (LRA). Surrogate markers that accurately measure virus production following an LRA are needed. METHODS: We quantified cell-associated unspliced (US), multiply spliced (MS) and supernatant (SN) HIV RNA by qPCR from total and resting CD4+ T cells isolated from seven PLWH on ART before and after treatment ex vivo with different LRAs, including histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi). MS and plasma HIV RNA were also quantified from PLWH on ART (n-11) who received the HDACi panobinostat. FINDINGS: In total and resting CD4+ T cells from PLWH on ART, detection of US RNA was common while detection of MS RNA was infrequent. Primers used to detect MS RNA, in contrast to US RNA, bound sites of the viral genome that are commonly mutated or deleted in PLWH on ART. Following ex vivo stimulation with LRAs, we identified a strong correlation between the fold change increase in SN and MS RNA, but not the fold change increase in SN and US RNA. In PLWH on ART who received panobinostat, MS RNA was significantly higher in samples with detectable compared to non0detectable plasma HIV RNA. INTERPRETATION: Following administration of an LRA, quantification of MS RNA is more likely to reflect an increase in virion production and is therefore a better indicator of meaningful latency reversal. FUNDING: NHMRC, NIH DARE collaboratory.
Authors: Steven G Deeks; Nancie Archin; Paula Cannon; Simon Collins; R Brad Jones; Marein A W P de Jong; Olivier Lambotte; Rosanne Lamplough; Thumbi Ndung'u; Jeremy Sugarman; Caroline T Tiemessen; Linos Vandekerckhove; Sharon R Lewin Journal: Nat Med Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Eun Hye Kim; Lara Manganaro; Michael Schotsaert; Brian D Brown; Lubbertus C F Mulder; Viviana Simon Journal: Cell Rep Methods Date: 2022-06-13
Authors: Thomas S Uldrick; Scott V Adams; Remi Fromentin; Michael Roche; Steven P Fling; Priscila H Gonçalves; Kathryn Lurain; Ramya Ramaswami; Chia-Ching Jackie Wang; Robert J Gorelick; Jorden L Welker; Liz O'Donoghue; Harleen Choudhary; Jeffrey D Lifson; Thomas A Rasmussen; Ajantha Rhodes; Carolin Tumpach; Robert Yarchoan; Frank Maldarelli; Martin A Cheever; Rafick Sékaly; Nicolas Chomont; Steven G Deeks; Sharon R Lewin Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 19.319
Authors: Sara Gianella; Stephen A Rawlings; Curtis Dobrowolski; Masato Nakazawa; Antoine Chaillon; Matthew Strain; Laura Layman; Gemma Caballero; Eileen Scully; Brianna Scott; Caitleen Pacis; Kathleen M Weber; Alan Landay; Christy Anderson; Jonathan Karn Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2022-08-24 Impact factor: 20.999
Authors: Michelle Y-H Lee; Georges Khoury; Moshe Olshansky; Secondo Sonza; Glen P Carter; James McMahon; Timothy P Stinear; Stephen J Turner; Sharon R Lewin; Damian F J Purcell Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 6.073
Authors: Jillian S Y Lau; James H McMahon; Celine Gubser; Ajantha Solomon; Chris Y H Chiu; Ashanti Dantanarayana; Socheata Chea; Surekha Tennakoon; Jennifer M Zerbato; Jill Garlick; Vincent Morcilla; Sarah Palmer; Sharon R Lewin; Thomas A Rasmussen Journal: AIDS Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 4.632
Authors: Samira Joussef-Piña; Immaculate Nankya; Sophie Nalukwago; Joy Baseke; Sandra Rwambuya; Dane Winner; Fred Kyeyune; Keith Chervenak; Bonnie Thiel; Robert Asaad; Curtis Dobrowolski; Benjamin Luttge; Blair Lawley; Cissy M Kityo; W Henry Boom; Jonathan Karn; Miguel E Quiñones-Mateu Journal: Retrovirology Date: 2022-01-15 Impact factor: 4.602
Authors: Shane D Falcinelli; Jackson J Peterson; Anne-Marie W Turner; David Irlbeck; Jenna Read; Samuel Lm Raines; Katherine S James; Cameron Sutton; Anthony Sanchez; Ann Emery; Gavin Sampey; Robert Ferris; Brigitte Allard; Simon Ghofrani; Jennifer L Kirchherr; Caroline Baker; JoAnn D Kuruc; Cynthia L Gay; Lindsey I James; Guoxin Wu; Paul Zuck; Inmaculada Rioja; Rebecca C Furze; Rab K Prinjha; Bonnie J Howell; Ronald Swanstrom; Edward P Browne; Brian D Strahl; Richard M Dunham; Nancie M Archin; David M Margolis Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2022-04-15 Impact factor: 19.456