| Literature DB >> 33647018 |
Taku Shigesawa1, Goki Suda1, Megumi Kimura1, Osamu Maehara1, Yoshimasa Tokuchi1, Akinori Kubo1, Ren Yamada1, Ken Furuya2, Masaru Baba2, Takashi Kitagataya1, Kazuharu Suzuki1, Masatsugu Ohara1, Naoki Kawagishi1, Masato Nakai1, Takuya Sho1, Mitsuteru Natsuizaka1, Kenichi Morikawa1, Koji Ogawa1, Naoya Sakamoto1.
Abstract
A deteriorated liver functional reserve during systemic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) causes poor patient outcomes. We aimed to identify predictive factors associated with the deterioration of Child-Pugh score at 8 weeks after lenvatinib initiation. Patients with adequate clinical data and baseline preserved serum samples available were included. Baseline fibroblast growth factor (FGF)19 and 21, angiopoietin (ANG)2, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels were evaluated. Thirty-seven patients were included, and 6, 15, 14, and 2 experienced complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. Twenty-four (65%) and 13 (35%) patients showed a maintained/improved and deteriorated Child-Pugh-score, respectively. While baseline clinical data, treatment response, and laboratory data were similar between these two patient groups, baseline ANG2 and VEGF levels were significantly higher (P = 0.0017) and lower (P = 0.0231), respectively, in patients with deteriorated Child-Pugh score than in those without. Based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, cut-off values for ANG2 and VEGF were found to be 3,108 pg/mL and 514.9 pg/mL, respectively. Among patients with low VEGF and high ANG2, 89% (8/9) exhibited a deteriorated Child-Pugh score, whereas none of the patients (0/9) with high VEGF and low ANG2 did. The deterioration of the Child-Pugh score in patients with unresectable HCC who are treated with lenvatinib may be predictable based on combined baseline serum ANG2 and VEGF levels.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33647018 PMCID: PMC7920365 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247728
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240