| Literature DB >> 33646491 |
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine whether college belonging and social support mediate the association between childhood psychological maltreatment and spiritual wellbeing among college young adults. The sample of the present study included 493 college young adults (33% male), ranging in age between 18 and 39 years (M = 21.35, SD = 2.56). The results showed that psychological maltreatment not only had a direct predictive effect on spiritual wellbeing but also an indirect predictive effect on spiritual wellbeing through college belonging and social support. These findings present important implications for research and practices by providing an in-depth understanding of the association between psychological maltreatment and spiritual wellbeing among Turkish college students.Entities:
Keywords: Belonging; College students; Positive psychology; Psychological maltreatment; Spiritual wellbeing
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33646491 PMCID: PMC7917174 DOI: 10.1007/s10943-021-01211-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Relig Health ISSN: 0022-4197
Sample characteristics (N = 493)
| Demographic variable | |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Female | 67% |
| Male | 33% |
| Age | |
| Range | 18–39 |
| Mean ( | 21.35 (2.56) |
| Socioeconomic status (SES) | |
| Low | 22.5% |
| Middle | 50.5% |
| Upper | 27.0% |
| Health status | |
| Healthy | 92.5% |
| Infected with the COVID-19 | 7.5% |
| Marital status | |
| Single | 94% |
| Married | 6% |
Descriptive statistics
| Skew | Kurt | α | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Psychological maltreatment | 19.25 | 7.05 | 1.42 | 1.67 | .91 | – | − .39 | − .42 | − .39 | |
| 2. College belonging | 52.61 | 9.88 | − .63 | .50 | .81 | – | .40 | .42 | ||
| 3. Social support | 24.25 | 5.37 | − 1.17 | .83 | .88 | – | .49 | |||
| 4. Spiritual wellbeing | 13.58 | 4.31 | − .76 | .23 | .83 | – |
All correlations are significant at the .001 level (2-tailed)
Fig. 1Mediation model indicating the mitigating effect of college belonging and social support
Unstandardized coefficients for the mediation model
| Consequent | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antecedent | Coeff | |||
| –.54 | .05 | –9.31 | < .001 | |
| Constant | 63.06 | 1.19 | 52.75 | < .001 |
| –.32 | .03 | –10.39 | < .001 | |
| Constant | 30.47 | .63 | 47.77 | < .001 |
| –.10 | .03 | –3.69 | < .001 | |
| .10 | .02 | 5.30 | < .001 | |
| .26 | .03 | 7.68 | < .001 | |
| Constant | 3.88 | 1.41 | 2.74 | .006 |
Number of bootstrap samples for percentile bootstrap confidence intervals: 10,000
SE standard error, Coeff unstandardized coefficient. X independent variable, M mediator variables, Y outcomes or dependent variables
Fig. 2The visual modeling indicating the association between the variables of the study. Note. Intervals (categorical predictors) = Quartiles