Literature DB >> 3364540

The biologic safety of the Cochlear Corporation multiple-electrode intracochlear implant.

R L Webb1, G M Clark, R K Shepherd, B K Franz, B C Pyman.   

Abstract

Studies have been undertaken to confirm the biologic safety of the Cochlear Corporation multi-electrode intracochlear implant. The materials used are biocompatible. The electrode array is flexible: it can be inserted with minimal or no trauma, providing the insertion is stopped when resistance is first felt. An atraumatic insertion is facilitated if a good view is obtained along the scala tympani of the basal turn of the cochlea by drilling through the crista fenestrae. The passage of the electrode around the cochlea can be facilitated if the electrode is rotated during insertion (clockwise for the left and anticlockwise for the right cochlea). The electrode can be explanted and another one reinserted with minimal or no trauma. A seal established around the electrode after an implantation period of 2 weeks can prevent infection extending from the middle to the inner ear. The electrical stimulus parameters produced by the Nucleus receiver-stimulator cause no loss of spiral ganglion cells or corrosion of the platinum band electrodes. Long-term stimulation has been carried out for up to 8 years in patients without affecting their clinical performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3364540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  9 in total

1.  Modelling encapsulation tissue around cochlear implant electrodes.

Authors:  T Hanekom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Residual hearing in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Walter Di Nardo; Italo Cantore; Pietro Melillo; Francesca Cianfrone; Alessandro Scorpecci; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The pattern and degree of capsular fibrous sheaths surrounding cochlear electrode arrays.

Authors:  Reuven Ishai; Barbara S Herrmann; Joseph B Nadol; Alicia M Quesnel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Intracochlear inflammatory response to cochlear implant electrodes in humans.

Authors:  Mohammad Seyyedi; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Optimal cochlear implant insertion vectors.

Authors:  Xenia Meshik; Timothy A Holden; Richard A Chole; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Dizziness and vestibular function before and after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Yoon Chan Rah; Joo Hyun Park; Jae Hong Park; Byung Yoon Choi; Ja-Won Koo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  A repot of surgical complications in a series of 262 consecutive pediatric cochlear implantations in iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Ajallouyean; Susan Amirsalari; Jaleh Yousefi; Mohammad-Ali Raeesi; Shokofeh Radfar; Mahdieh Hassanalifard
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.364

Review 8.  Electroacoustic stimulation: now and into the future.

Authors:  S Irving; L Gillespie; R Richardson; D Rowe; J B Fallon; A K Wise
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Influence of Cochlear Implantation on Vestibular Function in Children With an Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct.

Authors:  Ruijie Wang; Daogong Zhang; Jianfen Luo; Xiuhua Chao; Jiliang Xu; Xianfeng Liu; Zhaomin Fan; Haibo Wang; Lei Xu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.003

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.