Literature DB >> 33644939

Correction of Artifacts Induced by B0 Inhomogeneities in Breast MRI Using Reduced-Field-of-View Echo-Planar Imaging and Enhanced Reversed Polarity Gradient Method.

Ana E Rodríguez-Soto1, Lauren K Fang1, Dominic Holland1, Jingjing Zou2, Helen H Park3, Kathryn E Keenan4, Hauke Bartsch1, Joshua Kuperman1, Anne M Wallace5, Michael Hahn1, Haydee Ojeda-Fournier1, Anders M Dale1, Rebecca Rakow-Penner1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted (DW) echo-planar imaging (EPI) is prone to geometric distortions due to B0 inhomogeneities. Both prospective and retrospective approaches have been developed to decrease and correct such distortions.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the performance of reduced-field-of-view (FOV) acquisition and retrospective distortion correction methods in decreasing distortion artifacts for breast imaging. Coverage of the axilla in reduced-FOV DW magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and residual distortion were also assessed. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION/PHANTOM: Breast phantom and 169 women (52.4 ± 13.4 years old) undergoing clinical breast MRI. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3.0 T/ full- and reduced-FOV DW gradient-echo EPI sequence. ASSESSMENT: Performance of reversed polarity gradient (RPG) and FSL topup in correcting breast full- and reduced-FOV EPI data was evaluated using the mutual information (MI) metric between EPI and anatomical images. Two independent breast radiologists determined if coverage on both EPI data sets was adequate to evaluate axillary nodes and identified residual nipple distortion artifacts. STATISTICAL TESTS: Two-way repeated-measures analyses of variance and post hoc tests were used to identify differences between EPI modality and distortion correction method. Generalized linear mixed effects models were used to evaluate differences in axillary coverage and residual nipple distortion.
RESULTS: In a breast phantom, residual distortions were 0.16 ± 0.07 cm and 0.22 ± 0.13 cm in reduced- and full-FOV EPI with both methods, respectively. In patients, MI significantly increased after distortion correction of full-FOV (11 ± 5% and 18 ± 9%, RPG and topup) and reduced-FOV (8 ± 4% both) EPI data. Axillary nodes were observed in 99% and 69% of the cases in full- and reduced-FOV EPI images. Residual distortion was observed in 93% and 0% of the cases in full- and reduced-FOV images. DATA
CONCLUSION: Minimal distortion was achieved with RPG applied to reduced-FOV EPI data. RPG improved distortions for full-FOV images but with more modest improvements and limited correction near the nipple. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EPI distortion correction; RPG; breast MRI; reduced FOV; reversed polarity gradient

Year:  2021        PMID: 33644939     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

1.  Correcting B0 inhomogeneity-induced distortions in whole-body diffusion MRI of bone.

Authors:  Leonardino A Digma; Christine H Feng; Christopher C Conlin; Ana E Rodríguez-Soto; Allison Y Zhong; Troy S Hussain; Asona J Lui; Kanha Batra; Aaron B Simon; Roshan Karunamuni; Joshua Kuperman; Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Michael E Hahn; Anders M Dale; Tyler M Seibert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Breast MRI during pregnancy and lactation: clinical challenges and technical advances.

Authors:  Noam Nissan; Ethan Bauer; Efi Efraim Moss Massasa; Miri Sklair-Levy
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-04-09

3.  Tri-Compartmental Restriction Spectrum Imaging Breast Model Distinguishes Malignant Lesions from Benign Lesions and Healthy Tissue on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.

Authors:  Alexandra H Besser; Lauren K Fang; Michelle W Tong; Maren M Sjaastad Andreassen; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Christopher C Conlin; Stéphane Loubrie; Tyler M Seibert; Michael E Hahn; Joshua M Kuperman; Anne M Wallace; Anders M Dale; Ana E Rodríguez-Soto; Rebecca A Rakow-Penner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Diffusion Breast MRI: Current Standard and Emerging Techniques.

Authors:  Ashley M Mendez; Lauren K Fang; Claire H Meriwether; Summer J Batasin; Stéphane Loubrie; Ana E Rodríguez-Soto; Rebecca A Rakow-Penner
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  The value of whole-lesion histogram analysis based on field‑of‑view optimized and constrained undistorted single shot (FOCUS) DWI for predicting axillary lymph node status in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Shu Fang; Jun Zhu; Yafeng Wang; Jie Zhou; Guiqian Wang; Weiwei Xu; Wei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 2.795

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.