Literature DB >> 33644557

Active Modulation of an All-Dielectric Metasurface Analogue of Electromagnetically Induced Transparency in Terahertz.

Luyao Wang1, Zijie Gao1, Zhenlin Hou1, Jinmei Song1, Xiaoyu Liu1, Yifei Zhang1, Xiaodong Wang2, Fuhua Yang2, Yanpeng Shi1.   

Abstract

In this work, an analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) is excited by a periodic unit consisting of a silicon rectangular bar resonator and a silicon ring resonator in terahertz (THz). The analogue of the EIT effect can be well excited by coupling of the "bright mode" and the "dark mode" supported by the bar and the ring, respectively. Using the semimetallic properties of graphene, active control of the EIT-like effect can be realized by integrating a monolayer graphene into THz metamaterials. By adjusting the Fermi energy of graphene, the resonating electron distribution changes in the dielectric structures, resulting in the varying of the EIT-like effect. The transmission can be modulated from 0.9 to 0.3 with the Fermi energy of graphene placed under the ring resonator mold varying from 0 to 0.6 eV, while a modulation range of 0.9-0.3 corresponds to Fermi energy from 0 to 0.3 eV when graphene is placed under the rectangular bar resonator. Our results may provide potential applications in slow light devices and an ultrafast optical signal.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33644557      PMCID: PMC7906593          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c06082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

The electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) phenomenon is originally proposed by Harris in atomic physics, forming a narrow transparent window within a broad absorption band of light, which is the result of destructive quantum interference in a three-energy-atom system.[1,2] The feature of strong dispersion in the narrow transparent window makes it advantageous for applications in slow light, nonlinear enhancement, sensing devices, group delay, and so on.[3−10] Recently, this concept was extended to an analogue of EIT in plasmonic metamaterials because of their simple structure and ease of operation.[11−14] The classical analogue of EIT originates from the coupling of the bright mode and dark mode. The bright mode is a resonant mode excited directly by the incident wave. Meanwhile, the dark mode cannot be excited directly by the incident wave but it can be excited by the bright mode, thus resulting in an EIT-like effect.[15,16] Initially, metal is used to achieve the EIT-like effect. Fedotov’s research group designed a planar periodic array of asymmetric splitting rings composed of two arcs in different lengths, which provided an extremely narrow transmission.[17] Then, multifarious structures have been proposed gradually, for example, split-ring resonators (SRRs), bar resonator with SRRs, and so on, which have shown great prospects in optical filters and ultrasensitive biosensors.[18,19] However, the metal coupling excitation of the EIT-like effect is associated with high radiation losses, which limits achieving high transmission, a high Q-factor, or a large group index.[20] So, the analogue of EIT by dielectric metamaterials has attracted enormous interest. Yang’s research group experimentally demonstrated an analogue of the EIT effect using a silicon-based metasurface, which avoids high radiation losses and a Q-factor of 483 is observed.[21] Now, more and more all-dielectric structures can realize the EIT-like effect with a perfect narrow transparent window.[22,23] For practical applications, active tuning of metamaterials has attracted great interest in terahertz due to its ultrafast modulation speed and switching capabilities.[24−28] It is troublesome to passively control the EIT-like effect via changing the geometric parameters of the resonator structure. Gu’s research group initially demonstrated a method of active controlling the EIT-like effect by integrating photoconductive silicon into a metamaterial unit cell in THz.[29] Graphene is a monolayer carbon material, which is an interesting experimental material due to its unique electronic and optical properties. The active tuning of the terahertz resonance can be realized simply and economically as graphene is a tunable optical material, which can be characterized by its photoconductivity.[30−32] Xiao’s research group proposed a graphene metamaterial terahertz modulator, in which the structure is composed of a cut wire (CW) and SRRs, realizing an active modulation in the transmission peak value of the EIT-like effect by operating the Fermi energy of graphene.[33] It is possible to actively tune all-dielectric EIT-like effects through the tuning properties of graphene.[34−36] However, active tuning of all-dielectric THz metamaterials via graphene has been rarely reported. In this article, we propose, for the first time to the best of our knowledge, the use of graphene for active regulation in all-dielectric EIT-like metamaterials. The EIT-like effect is realized through the structure consisting of a silicon ring resonator and a silicon rectangular bar resonator. Utilizing the semimetallic properties of graphene, the quantum interference between the two resonant modes is influenced. First, we place the graphene beneath the silicon ring resonator. The transmission peak value gradually decays from 0.9 to 0.3 by changing the Fermi energy of graphene from 0 to 0.6 eV. Then, the graphene is placed under the rectangular bar resonator, and the modulation range is 0.9–0.3 when the Fermi energy of graphene varies from 0 to 0.3 eV. The principle of the regulation is analyzed through the image of the electromagnetic field. In addition, the real and the imaginary parts of the graphene conductivity depend on the frequency at the selected values of the Fermi energy, which further elucidate the physical underpinnings of the EIT-like metamaterials.[37] It may attract interest in developing electronic tunable EIT-like metamaterials and have a good promoting effect on slow light, light switch, and so on.

Results and Discussion

As shown in Figure a, the structure consists of a silicon ring resonator and a silicon rectangular bar resonator. The incident E-field is along the X-axis. The sample array occupies an area of 150 × 150 μm, and the spacing between each cell is 16 μm. The parameters of each cell are r1 = 45 μm, r2 = 22 μm, d1 = 30 μm, l1 = 144 μm, and g1 = 14 μm, respectively. In addition, the thickness of Si (refractive index n = 3.7) is 22 μm and the substrate material is a medium with index n = 1.48. The numerical simulations are conducted using the finite-difference time-domain method (FDTD). Here, the boundary conditions are periodic boundary conditions in the X and Y directions and perfect matching layers in the Z direction. The discretization of space adopts 0.1 times of the metallic structure’s size, and the calculation stops automatically when the running time is nearly 1200 ps. The graphene is treated as a two-dimensional material, and its thickness is zero in the numerical simulations.
Figure 1

(a) Schematic view of the all-dielectric structure. The inset of (a) shows the schematic of the unit cell. The geometrical parameters are: r1 = 45 μm, r2 = 22 μm, d1 = 30 μm, l1 = 144 μm, and g1 = 14 μm, respectively. (b) Transmission spectra of the structures with the rectangular bar and ring resonator (black curve); the structures with ring resonator only (red curve) and with rectangular bar resonator only (blue curve).

(a) Schematic view of the all-dielectric structure. The inset of (a) shows the schematic of the unit cell. The geometrical parameters are: r1 = 45 μm, r2 = 22 μm, d1 = 30 μm, l1 = 144 μm, and g1 = 14 μm, respectively. (b) Transmission spectra of the structures with the rectangular bar and ring resonator (black curve); the structures with ring resonator only (red curve) and with rectangular bar resonator only (blue curve). Simulated transmission spectra are shown in Figure b. For the structure with both ring and rectangular bar resonator, a narrow transparent window can be expressly observed at 1.11 THz. High transmission occurs in the effective range because the polarization of the incident plane wave has retained structural symmetry. The above principle can be well verified, but a transmission peak may occur due to the uneven environment caused by the segmentation of the ring (red curve). Only when the rectangular bar exists, a distinct projection peak appears at 1.12 THz (blue curve), which is the basic and direct response of metamaterials by the incident plane wave. As an electric dipole antenna, the rectangular bar resonator can be strongly coupled to the free space excitation caused by the electromagnetic energy incident along the X-axis, known as the “bright” mode, while the ring supports a magnetic dipole mode, in which the electromagnetic energy rotates along the axis of the ring in the azimuth direction, known as the “dark” mode. Since the magnetic arm of the incident wave is perpendicular to the dipole axis, the light cannot directly excite the magnetic dipole mode in the ring. Then, the bright mode couples with the dark mode, forming an analogue of the EIT effect. Next, the graphene is placed under the ring resonator for adjustment to explore the active tuning of the all-dielectric EIT-like metamaterials. The length and width of graphene are d3 = 5 μm and l2 = 150 μm, as shown in Figure a. With increasing graphene Fermi energy, the resonance intensity of EIT-like metamaterials at the specific resonance frequency is regulated without affecting adjacent spectra, as shown in Figure b. The transmission peak value gradually decays from 0.9 to 0.3 when the Fermi energy of graphene varies from 0 to 0.6 eV. Furthermore, the spectral contrast ratio is obviously seen. It can be found that when the transmission of EIT-like metamaterials reduces, the frequency shift occurs because of approaching the direct oscillation mode of the bright mode. Data simulation and analysis show that this modulation is due to the change of the dark mode damping rate because of increasing graphene conductivity. Thus, it causes an increase in spectral absorption, as shown in Figure c. When the Fermi energy is 0.6 eV, the absorption can reach up to 0.5. As the electromagnetic properties of graphene change due to its Fermi energy, it has a significant impact on the surrounding electromagnetic energy, as shown in Figure d–g, which has a strong effect on the metamaterial resonance. In the absence of graphene, the electromagnetic energy was mainly concentrated in the ring resonator, suggesting that the dark mode was excited by the bright mode, which could well explain the emergence of an EIT-like phenomenon. With increasing Fermi energy of graphene, the intensity of the corresponding electromagnetic energy image weakens. Thus, the window formant and the Q-factor obviously decrease. Finally, the coupling strength between the electromagnetic fields reduces and the EIT-like effect weakens, consistent with the transmission spectra shown in Figure b. This illustrates that the EIT-like effect can be regulated by introducing graphene.
Figure 2

Corresponding structure diagram and the electromagnetic energy diagram of graphene under the ring resonator. (a) Unit structure image of placing graphene under the ring resonator. (b) Image of transmission changing with the graphene Fermi energy. (c) Absorption image corresponding to the transmission with different Fermi energies. (d–g) Electromagnetic energy corresponding to different Fermi energies of graphene.

Corresponding structure diagram and the electromagnetic energy diagram of graphene under the ring resonator. (a) Unit structure image of placing graphene under the ring resonator. (b) Image of transmission changing with the graphene Fermi energy. (c) Absorption image corresponding to the transmission with different Fermi energies. (d–g) Electromagnetic energy corresponding to different Fermi energies of graphene. Similarly, we investigate the influence of graphene under the bar resonator in Figure a. In terms of parameters, graphene has d3 = 5 μm and l3 = 150 μm. As shown in Figure b, the transmission peak value obviously decreases when the Fermi energy of graphene varies from 0 to 0.3 eV. The incident light that resonates with the bar resonator is affected by the increase of the Fermi energy. When the Fermi energy is 0.2 eV, the transmission peak has an obvious decline compared to the device without graphene. Then, when EF is to 0.3 eV, the transmission peak almost disappears. The absorption of the structure increases with increasing Fermi level of graphene, as shown in Figure c. Moreover, the saturation absorption of graphene leads to the adjustment amplitude of the EIT phenomenon. The electromagnetic energy of the corresponding Fermi energy of graphene is plotted to further elucidate the physical underpinnings of the active modulation of EIT-like metamaterials, as shown in Figure d–g. When the Fermi energy of graphene is 0 eV, the EIT-like effect in the ring resonator is excited by coupling with the bar resonator in a round-about way, and the electromagnetic energy is mainly distributed in the ring resonator, as shown in Figure d. With increasing Fermi energy, a change of the bright mode damping rate causes electromagnetic energy attenuation. As shown in Figure g, the electromagnetic energy decays to near zero, which shows that the destructive interference between the ring resonator and bar resonator resonance mode disappears. Therefore, we can adjust the Fermi energy of graphene according to practical requirements to achieve active regulation of EIT-like metamaterials.
Figure 3

Corresponding structure diagram and the electromagnetic energy diagram of graphene under the bar resonator. (a) Unit structure image of placing graphene under the bar resonator for adjustment. (b) Transmittance spectra with different Fermi energies of graphene under the bar resonator. (c) Absorption of graphene with different Fermi energies. (d–g) Electromagnetic energy distribution diagram of the corresponding Fermi energy of graphene.

Corresponding structure diagram and the electromagnetic energy diagram of graphene under the bar resonator. (a) Unit structure image of placing graphene under the bar resonator for adjustment. (b) Transmittance spectra with different Fermi energies of graphene under the bar resonator. (c) Absorption of graphene with different Fermi energies. (d–g) Electromagnetic energy distribution diagram of the corresponding Fermi energy of graphene. To better explain the tuning principle of graphene, the real part and the imaginary part of the graphene conductivity at the frequency of 0.9–1.2 THz were calculated according to the equation, as shown in Figure a,b. It can be seen from the figure that the real part of graphene increases with increasing chemical potential from 0 to 0.3 eV, as well as the imaginary part. The doping charge density increases the Fermi energy to , so the higher charge density indicates the higher EF, resulting in higher loss and absorption. The electromagnetic waves induced by the dielectric metasurface and the absorption of the graphene layer are strongly coupled, so the reduction of the EIT effect may be related to increasing graphene absorption. With increasing graphene chemical formula, the electromagnetic energy attenuates significantly and the peak value decreases significantly, which can be attributed to the increase of the energy loss and absorption of the incident wave. It is clear that the origin of the EIT effect modulation is essentially the optically adjustable conductivity of the graphene.
Figure 4

(a) Real and (b) the imaginary parts of the graphene conductivity related to the frequency. The Fermi energy is varied from 0 to 0.3 eV, as shown in the insets.

(a) Real and (b) the imaginary parts of the graphene conductivity related to the frequency. The Fermi energy is varied from 0 to 0.3 eV, as shown in the insets.

Conclusions

In summary, we achieved active tuning of EIT analogue effects by integrating monolayer graphene into THz all-dielectric metamaterials. An obvious narrow band window can appear near the 1.1 THz frequency, which is excited by a silicon ring resonator and a silicon rectangular bar resonator in THz. Graphene with 0–0.6 eV was placed under the ring resonator mold with a transmission range of 0.9–0.3, and the EIT effect can be well tuned without affecting the adjacent spectrum. However, the modulation range is 0.9–0.3 for Fermi energy from 0 to 0.3 eV, when graphene is placed under the rectangular bar resonator. The window formant obviously decreases and the intensity of the corresponding electromagnetic energy weakens due to the increasing of Fermi energy. Then, the electromagnetic energy and the graphene conductivity further illuminate that this modulation changes the damping rate of the dark mode or bright mode caused by the increased conductivity of the graphene. This work may have a good promoting effect on slow light, light switch, and so on.
  19 in total

1.  Observation of coherent optical information storage in an atomic medium using halted light pulses.

Authors:  C Liu; Z Dutton; C H Behroozi; L V Hau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Toroidal dipolar response in a metamaterial.

Authors:  T Kaelberer; V A Fedotov; N Papasimakis; D P Tsai; N I Zheludev
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Experimental realization of an on-chip all-optical analogue to electromagnetically induced transparency.

Authors:  Qianfan Xu; Sunil Sandhu; Michelle L Povinelli; Jagat Shakya; Shanhui Fan; Michal Lipson
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Low-loss metamaterials based on classical electromagnetically induced transparency.

Authors:  P Tassin; Lei Zhang; Th Koschny; E N Economou; C M Soukoulis
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Polarization and incidence insensitive dielectric electromagnetically induced transparency metamaterial.

Authors:  Fuli Zhang; Qian Zhao; Ji Zhou; Shengxiang Wang
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  All-optical tuning of EIT-like dielectric metasurfaces by means of chalcogenide phase change materials.

Authors:  E Petronijevic; C Sibilia
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Active control of electromagnetically induced transparency analogue in terahertz metamaterials.

Authors:  Jianqiang Gu; Ranjan Singh; Xiaojun Liu; Xueqian Zhang; Yingfang Ma; Shuang Zhang; Stefan A Maier; Zhen Tian; Abul K Azad; Hou-Tong Chen; Antoinette J Taylor; Jiaguang Han; Weili Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Group delay and dispersion in adiabatic plasmonic nanofocusing.

Authors:  Vasily Kravtsov; Joanna M Atkin; Markus B Raschke
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.776

9.  Graphene plasmonics for tunable terahertz metamaterials.

Authors:  Long Ju; Baisong Geng; Jason Horng; Caglar Girit; Michael Martin; Zhao Hao; Hans A Bechtel; Xiaogan Liang; Alex Zettl; Y Ron Shen; Feng Wang
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 39.213

10.  Tunable electromagnetically induced transparency in coupled three-dimensional split-ring-resonator metamaterials.

Authors:  Song Han; Longqing Cong; Hai Lin; Boxun Xiao; Helin Yang; Ranjan Singh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Plasmon-Induced Transparency for Tunable Atom Trapping in a Chiral Metamaterial Structure.

Authors:  Zhao Chen; Yaolun Yu; Yilin Wang; Zhiling Hou; Li Yu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.076

2.  Graphene-based terahertz bias-driven negative-conductivity metasurface.

Authors:  Guibin Li; Guocui Wang; Tingting Yang; Yan Zhang; Jingling Shen; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2022-07-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.