Literature DB >> 33644531

Hydrogen Clathrate Structures in Uranium Hydrides at High Pressures.

Xiao-Hui Wang1, Fa-Wei Zheng2, Zhuo-Wei Gu3, Fu-Li Tan3, Jian-Heng Zhao3, Cang-Li Liu3, Cheng-Wei Sun3, Jian Liu4, Ping Zhang2,5,6.   

Abstract

Room-temperature superconductivity has always been an area of intensive research. Recent findings of clathrate metal hydrides structures have opened up the doors for achieving room-temperature superconductivity in these materials. Here, we report first-principles calculations for stable H-rich clathrate structures of uranium hydrides at high pressures. The clathrate uranium hydrides contain H cages with stoichiometries of H24, H29, and H32, in which H atoms are bonded covalently to other H atoms, and U atoms occupy the centers of the cages. Especially, a UH10 clathrate structure containing H32 cages is predicted to have an estimated T c higher than 77 K at high pressures.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33644531      PMCID: PMC7906488          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Ever since metallic hydrogen was predicted to present high-Tc phonon-mediated superconductivity,[1,2] plenty of experimental studies have been performed to realize solid metallic hydrogen[3−5] but extremely high pressure is required to get hydrogen metallization.[6] Luckily, hydrogen-rich compounds were predicted to be high-Tc superconductors with significantly lowered pressures than that in pure hydrogen to attain metallic states due to the fact that hydrogen atoms in hydrogen-rich compounds have already undergone a form of “precompression”.[7] Later on, numerous theoretical research studies have been implemented to search for high-Tc hydrogen-rich compounds with experimentally accessible pressure, and the estimated Tc of some compounds exceeds 200 K.[8−14] Especially, experimental results have reported the high-Tc superconductivity of H3S and LaH10, the Tc of which are up to 183 and 260 K, respectively.[15,16] These theoretical as well as experimental results have claimed the validity of precompression effect[7] and have stimulated researchers to find more high-Tc hydride superconductors. More recently, much attention is focused on clathrate metal hydride structures. Among them, CaH6,[10] LaH10,[13][13] and YH10[14,17] were reported to have Tc values above 200 K. As the research of hydrogen clathrate structures in rare earth hydrides reported, clathrate structures feature emergence of unusual H cages with stoichiometries of H24, H29, and H32, with H atoms weakly covalently bonding to each other and metal atoms occupying the centers of the cages.[17,18] Various research studies on superconducting clathrate metal hydride structures are currently under investigation.[14,19,20] In general, the high Tc of metal hydrides requires that electrons of H atoms contribute mainly to the electron density of states (DOS) at the Fermi level, and one way to promote high-Tc superconductivity is to search high H content metal hydrides. However, it turns out that some of these structures do not have higher Tc values (such as MgH16[21] and AsH8[22]) than those which contain relatively less H (CaH6[10] and YH6[23]) because of the undesirable appearance of H2-like molecular units in these structures, which leads to relatively lower density of states at the Fermi level.[17,20] Luckily, in these clathrate hydrides such as LaH10[13] and YH10,[14,17] the metal elements transfer electrons to H atoms, thus forming ionic bonds between metal elements and H atoms. Through the clathrate cages, these structures can avoid forming H2-like molecular units but can still have high H contents. In metal hydrides, many of the high Tc values correspond to hydrides of metals with low-lying empty orbitals[18] (such as Th[24] and Ac[25] elements, Tc of which is above 240 K). Recently, uranium hydrides were reported to have rich new compounds and many of them were expected to be high-temperature superconductors.[26] Therefore, to seek optimal solution of high-Tc metal hydrides, we turn attention to clathrate-structured uranium hydrides. On the one hand, clathrate uranium hydride can have high H contents due to the possible high oxidation states of the uranium element. On the other hand, clathrate cages of uranium hydride can avoid H2-like molecular units, increasing the thermodynamical stability of the clathrate structure. Meanwhile, the uranium element has relatively low electronegativity using the Pauling scale,[27] so uranium can easily transfer more electrons to hydrogen, thus may enhance the electron–phonon coupling (EPC) and possible superconductivity. We, here, report exploration of superconducting hydrogen clathrate structures in uranium hydrides at high pressures. The clathrate structures, electronic properties, and superconductivity are discussed below.

Results and Discussion

Our previous study has reported a structure search for uranium hydrides, and the formation enthalpies of uranium hydrides against the decomposition at high pressures has been reported,[28] in which the reference phases are solid uranium and molecular hydrogen. Based on this and research on clathrate structures of rare earth hydrides,[17] the structure search for clathrate uranium hydrides was executed at high pressures (50, 100, 200, and 300 GPa). Consequently, clathrate structures of UH at x = 6, 9, and 10 stoichiometries were found, and the convex hull diagrams against the decomposition reactions are depicted in Figure a–d. The energetic stabilities were obtained from their formation enthalpies relative to the decomposition. The dotted green lines show the most stable compounds under each pressure, and red five-pointed stars represent UH6, UH9, and UH10 clathrate structures. To show more clearly the results of the clathrate structures, only UH3–UH18 were plotted. It can be seen that all of the formation enthalpies of the investigated UH6, UH9, and UH10 clathrate structures are below zero, thus all of the compounds are stable against the decomposition. Among them, UH9 and UH10 are especially near convex hull lines, thus they are quite thermodynamically stable. The predicted UH9 and UH10 are more stable with increasing pressures as they approach the convex hull solid lines.
Figure 1

Formation enthalpies of uranium hydrides against the decomposition at high pressures. (a–d) Pressures of 50, 100, 200, and 300 GPa, respectively.

Formation enthalpies of uranium hydrides against the decomposition at high pressures. (a–d) Pressures of 50, 100, 200, and 300 GPa, respectively. For the investigated UH6, UH9, and UH10 clathrate structures, their space groups are Im3̅m-UH6, 63/mmc-UH9, and Fm3̅m-UH10, respectively, and the crystal structures are shown in Figure a–c. The clathrate structures can also be seen in Figure , which are H24 cages in UH6, H29 cages in UH9, and H32 cages in UH10, respectively. These clathrate structures share the same structures with lanthanum and yttrium hydrides,[17] and clathrate UH9 has the same structure with ref (26). Each H24 cage contains six squares and eight hexagons, the H29 cage consists of irregular squares, pentagons, and hexagons, and each H32 cage contains 6 squares and 12 hexagons. The properties of these clathrate structures have been clearly exported, and the UH10 clathrate structure under 300 GPa was taken as an example in the following part.
Figure 2

Crystal structures of clathrate UH systems. The small and large spheres represent H and U atoms, respectively. (a–c) Im3̅m -UH6, 63/mmc-UH9, and Fm3̅m-UH10, respectively, under 300 GPa.

Crystal structures of clathrate UH systems. The small and large spheres represent H and U atoms, respectively. (a–c) Im3̅m -UH6, 63/mmc-UH9, and Fm3̅m-UH10, respectively, under 300 GPa. To examine the chemical bonding of the UH6, UH9, and UH10 clathrate structures, the electron localization functions (ELFs)[29] were calculated, and the ELF of the UH10 clathrate structure under 300 GPa is shown in Figure a. Due to the absence of charge localization between U and H atoms, it can be seen that the U–H bonding is purely ionic, while H–H interaction is weakly covalent, which can be seen from the charge localization between the nearest-neighboring H atoms. In addition, within the H24, H29, and H32 cages in clathrate UH6, UH9, and UH10, the nearest H–H distances are equal to 1.217, 0.98, and 1.04 Å at 300 GPa, respectively, which are much longer than that in the H2 gas molecule (0.74 Å) and similar to the H–H distance (0.98 Å)[30] in monatomic solid hydrogen at 500 GPa. Then, Bader charge analysis[31,32] was executed, and it proved that electrons transfer from uranium atoms to hydrogen atoms. To be specific, about 1.3 electrons of per uranium atom transfer to the near hydrogen atoms, and every hydrogen atom can obtain 0.12–0.16 electrons. The amount of the transferred charge does not change much with the hydrogen contents and external pressure. This specific charge transferring mechanism enhances the stability of these clathrate structures.
Figure 3

(a) ELF plots for clathrate UH10 at 300 GPa. (b) The band structure and projected density of states (DOS) of clathrate UH10 at 300 GPa. Projected DOS of f electrons on U and s electrons in H atoms are plotted in green and yellow lines, respectively.

(a) ELF plots for clathrate UH10 at 300 GPa. (b) The band structure and projected density of states (DOS) of clathrate UH10 at 300 GPa. Projected DOS of f electrons on U and s electrons in H atoms are plotted in green and yellow lines, respectively. To investigate the mechanical properties of these predicted clathrate UH6, UH9, and UH10 on an atomic level, their band structures and projected DOS at high pressures were calculated and are depicted in Figures S1–S3, among which the results of the clathrate UH10 structure under 300 GPa are depicted in Figure b. It can be concluded from the band structures that all of the predicted clathrate structures exhibit metallic behavior by evidence of bands crossing the Fermi level. For the same space group of clathrate UH6, UH9, and UH10, the band structures and DOS look quite similar with different pressures. It can be inferred from the DOS that the major contribution of total DOS at the Fermi level is made from uranium atoms, and the DOS contribution of uranium atoms mainly consists of f electrons. Meanwhile, s electrons of H atoms contribute to the DOS around the Fermi level too. One can also see that f electrons of uranium atoms mainly lie above the Fermi level. Phonon dispersions of these clathrate structures have been calculated, and the highest phonon vibration mode at the Γ point for clathrate UH10 at 300 GPa is shown in Figure a. The vibration mode describes the H–H bond compressing and stretching. The high frequency and direct bond vibration contribute to the high EPC parameter λ, and thus favors high-Tc in these systems. Figure b shows the phonon dispersions of clathrate UH10 at 300 GPa. The phonon dispersions of clathrate UH6, UH9, and UH10 at 200 and 300 GPa are summarized in the Supporting Information (Figures S1–S3). All of the phonon dispersions in the whole first Brillouin zone (BZ) have positive frequencies, indicating their lattice dynamical stabilities.
Figure 4

(a) Highest phonon vibration mode at the Γ point for clathrate UH10 at 300 GPa. (b) The phonon dispersions of clathrate UH10 at 300 GPa. (c) Electronic DOS (top panel) of H at the Fermi level (NEf) per Å3, the EPC parameter λ (middle panel), and Tc (bottom panel) of the clathrate UH10 structure at different pressures.

(a) Highest phonon vibration mode at the Γ point for clathrate UH10 at 300 GPa. (b) The phonon dispersions of clathrate UH10 at 300 GPa. (c) Electronic DOS (top panel) of H at the Fermi level (NEf) per Å3, the EPC parameter λ (middle panel), and Tc (bottom panel) of the clathrate UH10 structure at different pressures. The electronic DOS at the Fermi level is notably large (∼12 states/cell), which may lead to superconductivity. However, the electronic DOS at the Fermi level is mainly contributed by U-f electrons, and the U atom is enormously heavy, thus its relatively low vibration may destroy the emergence of superconductivity. To study the superconducting properties of these clathrate structures more precisely, we calculated the electronic DOS projected on H atoms, electron–phonon coupling (EPC), and based on them calculated the superconducting transition temperature using the Dynes-corrected MacMillan’s equation.[33] Figure c shows the electronic DOS projected on H atoms, the EPC parameter λ, and superconducting transition temperature Tc. Following the Dynes-corrected MacMillan’s equation, Tc is given bywhere μ* represents the Coulomb pseudopotential parameter, which was chosen as μ* = 0.1 and 0.13. Our calculation results show that the DOS projected on H atoms, EPC parameter λ, and transition temperature Tc, all increase with increasing pressure. The detailed values in Figure c are listed in Table S1 of the Supporting Information. The EPC parameters λ are 0.714, 0.722, and 1.124 at 200, 300, and 400 GPa, respectively. The resulting Tc values are 40.2 (31.1), 74.9 (58.3), and 81.1 (71.2) K using μ* = 0.1 (0.13) for UH10 at 200, 300, and 400 GPa, respectively, which approach the liquid nitrogen temperature 77 K. The superconductivities of other f-electron clathrate structures have been investigated recently, and the predicted Tc for LaH9, CeH9, CeH10, and PrH9 is lower than 56 K.[17] Our study on clathrate UH10 enhanced the upper limit of the Tc of f-electron clathrate structures.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have used first-principles structure searching method to obtain the pressure-induced clathrate uranium hydrides UH6, UH9, and UH10, which contain H24, H29, and H32 cages. The U–H bonding in these clathrate structures is ionic, while covalent H–H interactions are evident between the nearest-neighbor H atoms. The clathrate structures exhibit potential high-Tc superconductivity (up to 81.1 K) that originates from relatively strong electron–phonon coupling.

Methods and Computational Details

To investigate the properties of uranium hydride UH, a variable-composition structure search has been executed with stoichiometries ranging from x = 0.5 to 18.[28] Based on previous results and the clathrate structures of rare earth hydrides,[17] we performed a further precise structure search at high pressures (50–400 GPa) via CALYPSO,[34] which is based on the swarm intelligence method.[35,36] Initial structures were generated randomly and then up to 30 generations were calculated, with each generation containing 40 structures. Then, ab initio density functional theory (DFT)[29] calculations were performed so the structures were optimized to local minimum via the VASP (Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package) code.[37,38] The PAW (projector-augmented wave) method[39] was chosen to describe the electron–ion interaction, and generalized gradient approximation[40] through Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof functional was adopted to deal with the exchange–correlation potential. Energy cutoff and k-point separation were set as 550 eV and 0.2 Å–1, respectively. The energetic convergence threshold was 10–6 eV and 10–2 eV/Å for force. Then, the structures of the lowest formation enthalpies could be obtained. Phonon dispersion and electron–phonon coupling (EPC) calculations were performed with density functional perturbation theory. The superconductivity calculations were performed using the Quantum-ESPRESSO package.[41,42] The q and k mesh were chosen as 3 × 3 × 3 and 18 × 18 × 18 for the uranium hydride structure in the first Brillouin zone (BZ) in the EPC calculations.
  27 in total

1.  High-Temperature Superconductivity in a Th-H System under Pressure Conditions.

Authors:  Alexander G Kvashnin; Dmitrii V Semenok; Ivan A Kruglov; Izabela A Wrona; Artem R Oganov
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 9.229

2.  Synchrotron infrared measurements of dense hydrogen to 360 GPa.

Authors:  Chang-Sheng Zha; Zhenxian Liu; Russell J Hemley
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1996-10-15

4.  Projector augmented-wave method.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1994-12-15

5.  QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials.

Authors:  Paolo Giannozzi; Stefano Baroni; Nicola Bonini; Matteo Calandra; Roberto Car; Carlo Cavazzoni; Davide Ceresoli; Guido L Chiarotti; Matteo Cococcioni; Ismaila Dabo; Andrea Dal Corso; Stefano de Gironcoli; Stefano Fabris; Guido Fratesi; Ralph Gebauer; Uwe Gerstmann; Christos Gougoussis; Anton Kokalj; Michele Lazzeri; Layla Martin-Samos; Nicola Marzari; Francesco Mauri; Riccardo Mazzarello; Stefano Paolini; Alfredo Pasquarello; Lorenzo Paulatto; Carlo Sbraccia; Sandro Scandolo; Gabriele Sclauzero; Ari P Seitsonen; Alexander Smogunov; Paolo Umari; Renata M Wentzcovitch
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.333

6.  Ground-state structures of atomic metallic hydrogen.

Authors:  Jeffrey M McMahon; David M Ceperley
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Optical studies of solid hydrogen to 320 GPa and evidence for black hydrogen.

Authors:  Paul Loubeyre; Florent Occelli; René LeToullec
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Superconductivity at approximately 100 K in dense SiH4(H2)2 predicted by first principles.

Authors:  Yinwei Li; Guoying Gao; Yu Xie; Yanming Ma; Tian Cui; Guangtian Zou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Evidence for a new phase of dense hydrogen above 325 gigapascals.

Authors:  Philip Dalladay-Simpson; Ross T Howie; Eugene Gregoryanz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Synthesis and Stability of Lanthanum Superhydrides.

Authors:  Zachary M Geballe; Hanyu Liu; Ajay K Mishra; Muhtar Ahart; Maddury Somayazulu; Yue Meng; Maria Baldini; Russell J Hemley
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 15.336

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.