Lei Zhang1,2, Xin Sun1, Xiang Liu1,2, Yuanhua He1,2, Yonggang Chen1,2, Zhenwei Liao1, Han Gao1, Shuo Wang3. 1. College of Civil Aviation Safety Engineering, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Deyang, Sichuan 618307, P R of China. 2. Key Laboratory of Fire Science and Safety Engineering of Sichuan Province, Deyang, Sichuan 618307, P R of China. 3. PetroChina Lubricant Company, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100020, P R of China.
Abstract
Diacetoxy-stearoyloxy-titanium-modified graphene oxide (Titanate-GO) was successfully prepared using titanium tetraisopropanolate, stearic acid, acetic acid, and graphene oxide (GO). The morphology and structure of the as-prepared materials were tested by FT-IR, Raman, TG/DSC, SEM, and TEM instruments. The results indicate that long alkyl titanium chains have been grafted on the surface of a GO sheet, which guaranteed the dispersibility of Titanate-GO in PAO10 base oil. Then, the lubrication properties of Titanate-GO as a lubricating additive in PAO10 base oil were evaluated on a four-ball machine. The results show that the average coefficient of friction and wear scar diameter were reduced by 49.5 and 28.2%, respectively, compared with bare PAO10 base oil. Finally, the lubrication mechanism was discussed based on the Raman analysis, which was carried out on the worn surface of the steel ball.
Diacetoxy-stearoyloxy-titanium-modified graphene oxide (Titanate-GO) was successfully prepared using titanium tetraisopropanolate, stearic acid, acetic acid, and graphene oxide (GO). The morphology and structure of the as-prepared materials were tested by FT-IR, Raman, TG/DSC, SEM, and TEM instruments. The results indicate that long alkyl titanium chains have been grafted on the surface of a GO sheet, which guaranteed the dispersibility of Titanate-GO in PAO10 base oil. Then, the lubrication properties of Titanate-GO as a lubricating additive in PAO10 base oil were evaluated on a four-ball machine. The results show that the average coefficient of friction and wear scar diameter were reduced by 49.5 and 28.2%, respectively, compared with bare PAO10 base oil. Finally, the lubrication mechanism was discussed based on the Raman analysis, which was carried out on the worn surface of the steel ball.
In 2004, the novel graphene
was first prepared by
Geim and Novoselov. The one-atom-thick graphene was found to possess
great talent in several properties such as high thermal stability,
low surface energy, excellent mechanical strength, superconductivity,
good transmittance, and so on.[1−5] Therefore,
graphene-related materials have brought wide interest and research.
In the last two decades, numbers of researches have been focusing
on the several application fields, macroscopic preparation techniques,
and industrial production. Furthermore, great technological breakthroughs
have been made in many terminal application products.[6−12]As is known to all, friction and wear play
a very important role in energy consumption and materials losses.[13,14] Using friction reduction and anti-wear additives is an effective
method to formulate high-performance lubricants. Owing to the ultrathin
lamellar structure, low shear stress, ultimate mechanical strength,
and high thermal stability, graphene and modified graphene possess
potential application prospect as a lubricant additive.[15−20] The challenge
of graphene dispersion in oil has been solved in many research reports.
Thus, many researchers have reported their work focusing on the lubricating
properties of modified graphene. Khatri et al.[21] have reported that octadecylamine-functionalized graphene
oxide improves the performance of hexadecane by 26 and 9% reduction
in the friction coefficient and wear scar diameter, respectively.
Cheng et al.[22,23] developed an oleic diethanolamide
borate-modified graphene oxide (ODAB) possessing good dispersibility
and transparency in oil. Furthermore, the friction coefficient and
wear scar diameter of base oil with 0.02 wt % ODAB was decreased by
38.4 and 42.0%, respectively. The maximum non-seizure load (PB) increased by 46.2%. Recently, they reported
an eco-friendly expansion–reduction exfoliation method to prepare
graphene from graphene oxide (GO) with the aid of oxalic acid (H2C2O4). The test results showed that
the friction reduction and wear-resistant properties were improved
by 35.8 and 32.8%, respectively.[24]The alkylated graphene (AGN) was prepared and shown to possess excellent
anti-wear and friction reduction properties in our previous work.[25] However, the boundary lubrication performance
of AGN was not outstanding. Hu et al.[26] synthesized organic titanate (STAE) via an in situ method with soybeanoil, diethanolamine, and isopropyl titanate. The as-synthesized STAE
exhibits excellent anti-wear and load-carrying capacities as well
as good anti-wear synergism with zinc dialkyldithiophosphate (ZDDP)
in poly-α-olefin. It deserves to be mentioned that titanium
complex grease is a kind of lubricant with excellent properties. Although
it contains less additives, titanium complex grease possesses better
tribological property, high- and low-temperature property, shear stability,
and biodegradability.[27]Boundary
friction is very common in mechanical motion under large load. When
the oil film between friction pairs breaks down, a boundary lubrication
film is important to protect the surfaces of friction pairs. Thus,
boundary lubrication performance of a lubricant additive is undoubtedly
important. According to the previous research, graphene additive modified
with non-polar alkyl showed a poor boundary anti-wear property.[25]In this paper, we report a mild method
to prepare diacetoxy-stearoyloxy-titanium-modified graphene oxide
(Titanate-GO) and the application of Titanate-GO as friction reduction
and anti-wear additive in PAO10 base oil. The structure of Titanate-GO
was characterized using FT-IR, Raman, TG/DSC, SEM, and TEM. The results
show that the long alkyl titanium chains have been successfully grafted
on the surface of the GO sheet. Then, the lubrication performance
of PAO10 containing different concentrations of Titanate-GO was evaluated
on a four-ball machine. The testing results indicated significant
enhancement in lubrication performance of base oil by adding a small-dose
Titanate-GO additive, showing promising application potential as an
oil-based lubricant additive. Finally, the lubrication mechanism is
further discussed on the basis of Raman shift analysis on the worn
surfaces of steel balls.
Result and Discussion
Characterization of Titanate-GO
FT-IR
Analysis
The FT-IR analyses of GO and Titanate-GO
are displayed in Figure . The peaks around 1735 cm–1 in all spectra are
attributed to the C=O on the surface of GO and Titanate-GO.
As for GO, the wide band around 3191 cm–1 is assigned
to the stretching vibration of O–H. The same band in the Titanate-GO
spectrum is around 3195 cm–1. The new peak in Titanate-GO
around 754 cm–1 is the in-plane vibration of −CH2–. Meanwhile, the peaks at 1417 and 1379 cm–1 are attributed to the −CH3– groups, indicating
that the long-chain alkyl groups have been grafted on the surface
of Titanate-GO. The peak at 1512 cm–1 is assigned
to the vibration of −COO– of carboxylate. According
to the FT-IR analysis, we may conclude that the long alkyl titanium
chain has been successfully grafted on the surface of the GO sheet.
Figure 1
FT-IR
spectra of (a) GO and (b) Titanate-GO.
FT-IR
spectra of (a) GO and (b) Titanate-GO.
XPS Analysis
The XPS spectra of GO and
Titanate-GO are shown in Figure . As shown in the C1s spectrum
of GO, C and O were detected: C–C/C=C (284.8 eV), C–O
(286.7 eV), and C=O (287.2 eV). In the wide-scan XPS survey
spectrum of Titanate-GO (Figure c), there is a new signal of Ti2p detected in Titanate-GO:
Ti–C (458.8 eV) and Ti–O (464.6 eV). We can also observe
that the intensity of the C1s peak increased in the Titanate-GO survey
spectrum. The quantitative composition of GO and Titanate-GO attributed
to the XPS analysis is shown in Table . The C/O atomic ratio increases from 1.65 in GO to
1.99 in Titanate-GO, suggesting that long-chain alkyl was introduced
into the structure of Titanate-GO.
Figure 2
(a) Wide-scan
XPS survey
spectrum and (b) C1s spectrum of GO. (c) Wide-scan XPS survey spectrum
and (d) Ti2p spectrum of Titanate-GO.
Table 1
Quantitative
Composition of GO and Titanate-GO
mass fraction
(wt %)
atom ratio (%)
element
GO
Titanate-GO
GO
Titanate-GO
C
55.37
53.59
62.32
64.48
O
44.63
35.83
37.68
32.33
Ti
0
10.58
0
3.19
(a) Wide-scan
XPS survey
spectrum and (b) C1s spectrum of GO. (c) Wide-scan XPS survey spectrum
and (d) Ti2p spectrum of Titanate-GO.
TG/DSC
Analysis
The thermal decomposition
properties of GO and Titanate-GO were evaluated from 30 to 800 °C
under flowing N2 using the TG/DSC method. In Figure , the curve of GO shows a small
amount of loss of adsorbed water in the sample around 100 °C.
Then, the loss of GO around 200 °C can be attributed to the vigorous
release of pyrolysis gas from labile functional groups,[28,29] which results in a thermal expansion of the modified graphene.[30] The thermal weight loss analysis of GO has been
reported in our previous work.[31] However,
the thermal weight loss of Titanate-GO was much less than GO, showing
that the thermal stability of Titanate-GO was better than GO. According
to the comparison of thermal weight loss and heat flow of GO and Titanate-GO,
the heat flow of GO was always higher than Titanate-GO (Figure ).
Figure 3
TG curves of
(a) GO and
(b) Titanate-GO. DSC curves of (c) GO and (d) Titanate-GO.
TG curves of
(a) GO and
(b) Titanate-GO. DSC curves of (c) GO and (d) Titanate-GO.
Morphology
Analysis of Titanate-GO
The morphology of GO and Titanate-GO
sheets were investigated on
SEM and TEM instruments, and the images are shown in Figure . The images in Figure clearly show the layer structure
of GO and Titanate-GO. The SEM (a–d) and TEM (e, f) images
present the ultrathin structure and smooth surface of GO and Titanate-GO,
respectively. This is important to guarantee the interposition of
Titanate-GO nanosheets into the gap between friction pairs. The inset
images of EDS analysis show the new emergence of Ti element in Titanate-GO,
indicating the introduction of alkyl titanate on the GO surface.
Figure 4
SEM images
of (a, c) GO and (b, d) Titanate-GO. TEM images of (e) GO and (f)
Titanate-GO. EDS spectrum of (h) GO and (i) Titanate-GO.
SEM images
of (a, c) GO and (b, d) Titanate-GO. TEM images of (e) GO and (f)
Titanate-GO. EDS spectrum of (h) GO and (i) Titanate-GO.
Lubrication Characterization
of Titanate-GO
The tribological performance of Titanate-GO
was evaluated on a four-ball machine. The wear scar diameter (WSD)
of Titanate-GO in PAO10 base oil was tested on a four-ball machine
as per standard ASTM D4172 (75 °C, 1200 rpm, 392 N, 60 min).
Meanwhile, the coefficient of friction (COF) between the top ball
and lower three balls was recorded. The results are shown in Figure . The COF curves
shown in Figure a
illustrate the fluctuation of the COF. The COF of bare PAO10 kept
climbing from 0.07 to 0.12 throughout the test. However, the PAO10
with different concentrations of Titanate-GO all display lower COF.
When the concentration of Titanate-GO was 0.1 mg/mL, the COF declined
significantly with drastic fluctuation. The COF of PAO10 containing
0.5 mg/mL fluctuated more drastically than the others throughout the
testing process and increased with the time. The lowest and most stable
COF was found at the concentration of 0.3 mg/mL. According to Figure b, the average COF
decreased with the increasing of concentration during the early period
and increased later. The lowest COF (∼0.055) at the concentration
of 0.3 mg/mL is reduced by 49.5% compared to pure PAO10.
Figure 5
(a) Friction
coefficient curves and (b) average friction coefficient of PAO10 with
and without Titanate-GO sheets. Test condition: 75 °C, 1200 rpm,
392 N, 60 min.
(a) Friction
coefficient curves and (b) average friction coefficient of PAO10 with
and without Titanate-GO sheets. Test condition: 75 °C, 1200 rpm,
392 N, 60 min.Wear
scar diameter (WSD) results measured by a four-ball machine are shown
in Figure . The results
show that the WSD decreased with the increment of Titanate-GO concentration
to the lowest value 585.5 μm. It is about a 28.2% decline compared
to 710.0 μm of the bare PAO10 base oil. Then, there is an increment
as the concentration of Titanate-GO increases.
Figure 6
Wear scar diameter as
a function of the concentration
of Titanate-GO blended in PAO10 base oil. Test condition: 75 °C,
1200 rpm, 392 N, 60 min.
Wear scar diameter as
a function of the concentration
of Titanate-GO blended in PAO10 base oil. Test condition: 75 °C,
1200 rpm, 392 N, 60 min.The SEM images
of wear scar shown in Figure nicely confirm the results above.
Figure 7
SEM images of the wear
scar of steel balls lubricated
by PAO10 with and without Titanate-GO. (a–d) 0, 0.2, 0.3, and
0.5 mg/mL, respectively. (a′–d′) Magnified images
of panels (a–d), respectively.
SEM images of the wear
scar of steel balls lubricated
by PAO10 with and without Titanate-GO. (a–d) 0, 0.2, 0.3, and
0.5 mg/mL, respectively. (a′–d′) Magnified images
of panels (a–d), respectively.The microscopy image
in Figure a shows
serious adhesive wear with many deep hollows, which was lubricated
by bare PAO10. Meanwhile, metal exfoliation can be clearly observed
under higher magnification in Figure a′. However, as shown in the other images, the
wear scar diameter was significantly reduced with smoother features,
and no evidence of abrasive wear was detected in the presence of Titanate-GO.Furthermore, to understand the role of Titanate-GO as a lubricating
additive during the friction procedure, Raman shift was performed
on worn surfaces in the presence and absence of Titanate-GO (Figure ). There are two
characteristic bands observed around 1340 (D band) and 1590 cm–1 (G band) in Raman shift of Titanate-GO, which represent
the defects and regular skeleton on graphene, respectively,[32,33] as the same two characteristic bands of graphene were also detected
on the worn surface of the steel ball used in the lubrication property
test, which was lubricated by PAO10 with 0.3 mg/mL Titanate-GO. However,
there is no Raman signal detected on the worn surface lubricated with
bare PAO10 base oil. These comparison results indicate that the Titanate-GO
sheets have entered the gap of friction pairs. Combining with the
result of the lubrication property test, we consider that the Titanate-GO
sheets formed an effective lubricating film on the steel balls.
Figure 8
Raman shifts
of (a) Titanate-GO
sample and worn surface lubricated (c) without and
Raman shifts
of (a) Titanate-GO
sample and worn surface lubricated (c) without and(b) with 0.3 mg/mL Titanate-GO.
Conclusions
In this research, the GO was
modified with alkyl titanate through facile procedures, and a kind
of effective lubricating additive was prepared. The followed characterizations
using FT-IR, XPS, Raman, TG/DSC, SEM, and TEM confirmed that the alkyl
titanate was successfully grafted on the surface of GO, which guaranteed
the stable dispersibility of Titanate-GO in PAO10 base oil. The tribological
properties tests of Titanate-GO performed on a four-ball machine in
terms of friction coefficient and wear scar diameter indicate its
promising application potential as friction reduction and anti-wear
additive in oil.
Experimental
Section
Materials
The self-made GO was prepared
by modified Hummer’s method.[34,35] The procedure
details were reported in a previous work.[31] The 10cSt polyalphaolefin (PAO10) base oil was
purchased from Shenyang Hongcheng Fine Chemical Plant. The specifications
of PAO10 are tabulated in Table . The other chemicals were purchased from Aladdin and
used without any further treatment.
Table 2
Specifications of
PAO10 without and
with
0.3 Mg/mL Titanate-GO
sample ID
density (20 °C) (kg/m3)
viscosity (40 °C) (mm2/s)
viscosity (100 °C) (mm2/s)
viscosity index
pour point (°C)
PAO10
833.9
65.23
10.07
140
–57
PAO10 + Titanate-GO
834.0
65.30
10.05
139
–57
Preparation
and Characterization of Titanate-GO
The alkyl titanate-modified
graphene dioxide (Titanate-GO) was
prepared by three steps (Scheme ). The reaction procedures were carried out in the
atmosphere of nitrogen. Briefly, 372 mg of titanium tetraisopropanolate
and 40 mL of THF was mixed in a 250 mL flask followed by 10 min of
stirring at room temperature. Then, 220 mg of GO was dispersed in
40 mL of THF by 5 min ultrasonic treatment and added into the flask
dropwise followed by 1 h of stirring at 60 °C. Furthermore, 746
mg of steric acid and 358 of mg acetic acid were added as the lipophilic
group modifier followed by 2 h of stirring and reflux, respectively.
The solvent and as-formedisopropanol were removed by evaporation.
Finally, the target product was washed with ethyl acetate and tetrahydrofuran
and dried at 50 °C in a vacuum oven. The samples of GO and Titanate-GO
were characterized by FT-IR, XPS, Raman, TG/DSC, SEM, and TEM.
Scheme 1
Schematic
Mode for the Fabrication of Titanate-GO
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of GO and Titanate-GO
samples were characterized by infrared spectroscopy (PerkinElmer Spectrum
Two) with KBr pellets as the sample matrix. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS, Escalab 250XI, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to analyze
the binding energy of the samples. Raman spectroscopy (Dxi, Thermo
Fisher Scientific) was also used with a 633 nm laser excitation. Thermostability
of samples was tested on a thermal analyzer (PerkinElmer TGA4000)
from 30 to 800 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The
morphology was observed on SEM (FEI Inspect F50, 10 kV) and TEM (JEM-2100,
200 kV) instruments.
Lubrication Properties
Test
Different concentrations of
compounded lubricating oil with Titanate-GO in PAO10 base oil were
prepared using an ultrasonic method. Then, the tribological properties
of compounded lubricating oil were evaluated in terms of frictional
coefficient (COF) and wear scar diameter (WSD) on a four-ball test
machine according to the standard ASTM D4172 (75 °C, 1200 rpm,
392 N, 60 min). Meanwhile, the coefficient of friction (COF) between
the top ball and three lower clamped balls was recorded once a second.
Finally, the wear scar diameter was observed and measured on an SEM
instrument.
Authors: K S Novoselov; A K Geim; S V Morozov; D Jiang; Y Zhang; S V Dubonos; I V Grigorieva; A A Firsov Journal: Science Date: 2004-10-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sasha Stankovich; Dmitriy A Dikin; Geoffrey H B Dommett; Kevin M Kohlhaas; Eric J Zimney; Eric A Stach; Richard D Piner; SonBinh T Nguyen; Rodney S Ruoff Journal: Nature Date: 2006-07-20 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Konstantin N Kudin; Bulent Ozbas; Hannes C Schniepp; Robert K Prud'homme; Ilhan A Aksay; Roberto Car Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2007-12-22 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: T Ramanathan; A A Abdala; S Stankovich; D A Dikin; M Herrera-Alonso; R D Piner; D H Adamson; H C Schniepp; X Chen; R S Ruoff; S T Nguyen; I A Aksay; R K Prud'Homme; L C Brinson Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2008-05-11 Impact factor: 39.213