| Literature DB >> 33644432 |
Hina Hina1, Mohammad Nafees1, Toufiq Ahmad2.
Abstract
Water scarcity is a known and major issue throughout the world. To tackle water scarcity, there is an urgent need for water re-use and recycling through wastewater treatment. This study is an attempt to re-used industrial effluent after treatment with gamma irradiation. The main drain of the industrial estate was sampled and analyzed for Physico-chemical parameters. For treatment, irradiation dose 13 Kilo Gray (kGy) cobalt (Co60) was applied. The treated water was re-analyzed for comparison with pre-analysis and compliance with the National environmental quality standard (NEQS). A decrease was observed in TSS, BOD5, and COD with 79%, 81%, and 85% respectively. The results achieved are within the permissible limits of NEQS. It was concluded that gamma radiation is an instant method for industrial effluent and is herein recommended.Entities:
Keywords: BOD; COD; Gamma irradiation; Industrial estate; TSS; Wastewater
Year: 2021 PMID: 33644432 PMCID: PMC7895719 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Map of the Sampling sites.
Industrial Wastewater characteristics.
| S.No | Sampling sites | Conc. | pH | EC | TDS | TSS | BOD | COD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P1 | Min | 7.7 | 1100 | 650 | 460 | 255 | 370 |
| Max | 8.6 | 1300 | 730 | 580 | 275 | 382 | ||
| Avg | 8.4 | 1200 | 672 | 520 | 263 | 376 | ||
| P2 | Min | 7.3 | 1100 | 610 | 563 | 270 | 350 | |
| Max | 8.3 | 1300 | 700 | 650 | 285 | 375 | ||
| Avg | 7.9 | 1200 | 659 | 615 | 275 | 369 | ||
| 3 | P3 | Min | 6.6 | 1280 | 620 | 470 | 140 | 270 |
| Max | 7.8 | 1300 | 770 | 661 | 160 | 290 | ||
| Avg | 7.2 | 1240 | 690 | 540 | 149 | 285 | ||
| 4 | P4 | Min | 6.6 | 1000 | 640 | 490 | 175 | 361 |
| Max | 7.9 | 1300 | 710 | 679 | 185 | 380 | ||
| Avg | 7.4 | 1200 | 660 | 590 | 180 | 370 | ||
| Pak – NEQS | 06–10 | -- | 3500 | 150 | 80 | 150 | ||
Effect of Gamma irradiation on selected water quality parameters.
| Parameter | Sample No | Reading Before Treatment | Reading After Treatment | % Change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Max | Average | Min | Max | Average | |||
| pH | P1 | 7.7 | 8.6 | 8.4 | 7.5 | 8.2 | 7.9 | 5% |
| P2 | 7.3 | 8.3 | 7.9 | 6.5 | 7.3 | 6.9 | 1% | |
| P3 | 6.6 | 7.8 | 7.2 | 6.2 | 7.3 | 6.9 | 4% | |
| P4 | 6.6 | 7.9 | 7.4 | 6.5 | 7.4 | 6.8 | 8% | |
| EC | P1 | 2200 | 2070 | 2050 | 2642 | 2665 | 2658 | 23% |
| P2 | 2530 | 2570 | 2558 | 2845 | 2879 | 2862 | 12% | |
| P3 | 1410 | 1460 | 1444 | 1635 | 1658 | 1642 | 14% | |
| P4 | 1490 | 1525 | 1508 | 1685 | 1705 | 1696 | 13% | |
| TDS | P1 | 1100 | 1035 | 1025 | 1265 | 1285 | 1279 | 21% |
| P2 | 1265 | 1285 | 1279 | 1425 | 1444 | 1431 | 11% | |
| P3 | 705 | 730 | 722 | 830 | 850 | 840 | 14% | |
| P4 | 745 | 762 | 754 | 840 | 862 | 849 | 11% | |
| TSS | P1 | 460 | 580 | 520 | 101 | 128 | 115 | 78% |
| P2 | 563 | 650 | 615 | 115 | 139 | 126 | 80% | |
| P3 | 470 | 661 | 540 | 105 | 127 | 118 | 78% | |
| P4 | 490 | 679 | 590 | 100 | 133 | 120 | 80% | |
| BOD | P1 | 255 | 275 | 263 | 30 | 45 | 38 | 85% |
| P2 | 270 | 285 | 275 | 40 | 55 | 49 | 82% | |
| P3 | 140 | 160 | 149 | 20 | 35 | 28 | 81% | |
| P4 | 175 | 185 | 180 | 30 | 42 | 36 | 80% | |
| COD | P1 | 370 | 382 | 376 | 47 | 62 | 51 | 86% |
| P2 | 350 | 375 | 369 | 40 | 56 | 49 | 87% | |
| P3 | 270 | 290 | 285 | 38 | 45 | 42 | 85% | |
| P4 | 361 | 380 | 370 | 48 | 65 | 51 | 86% | |