Literature DB >> 33644381

Complete mitochondrial genome of the Amur sculpin Cottus szanaga (Cottoidei: Cottidae).

Evgeniy S Balakirev1,2,3, Pavel A Saveliev2, Francisco J Ayala1.   

Abstract

The complete mitochondrial genome was sequenced in two individuals of the Amur sculpin Cottus szanaga. The genome sequences are 16,518 bp in size, and the gene arrangement, composition, and size are very similar to the other sculpin genomes published previously. The low level of sequence divergence detected between the genome of C. szanaga and the GenBank complete mitochondrial genome of the Cherskii's sculpin Cottus czerskii (KJ956027) may likely be due to recent divergence, historical hybridization, or presence of a new unrecognized taxonomic unit close to C. szanaga but erroneously identified as C. czerskii.
© 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amur sculpin Cottus szanaga; Cherskii's sculpin Cottus czerskii; cottidae

Year:  2016        PMID: 33644381      PMCID: PMC7871824          DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2016.1233470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour        ISSN: 2380-2359            Impact factor:   0.658


The Amur sculpin Cottus szanaga Dybowski 1869 is a freshwater fish with wide distribution along the Amur River, as well as in some other rivers of the Sea of Japan and the Sea of Okhotsk basins, and north Sakhalin Island. Berg (1949) considered C. szanaga as a synonym of the spotted sculpin C. poecilopus Heckel. Later, based on morphological data, the validity of C. szanaga was proved (Shedko & Shedko 2003; Sideleva & Goto 2009). There are, however, no genetic data to confirm the species identity of C. szanaga or its relationship with other species belonging to the genus Cottus. We have sequenced two complete mitochondrial (mt) genomes of C. szanaga (GenBank accession numbers KX762049 and KX762050) from the Sobolevka River (46° 27′ 456 N, 137° 81′ 247 E) and the Amgu River (45° 89′ 100 N, 137° 25′ 618 E), Primorsky krai, Russia, using primers designed with the program mitoPrimer_V1 (Yang et al. 2011). The specimens are stored in the museum of the A. V. Zhirmunsky Institute of Marine Biology, Vladivostok, Russia (www.museumimb.ru) under accession numbers MIMB 33123 and MIMB 33124. The size of the genome is 16,518 bp and the gene arrangement, composition and size are very similar to the sculpin fish genomes published previously. There were 27 single nucleotides but no length differences between the haplotypes CSZID2 and CSZIF3; total sequence divergence (Dxy) was 0.0016 ± 0.0003. Comparison of the mt genomes now obtained with other complete mt genomes available in GenBank for the family Cottidae, including the genera Cottus, Mesocottus, Trachidermus, Enophrys, Icelus and Clinocottus reveal a close affinity of C. szanaga to other Cottus species (Figure 1) with a low level of sequence divergence between our specimens and the complete mitochondrial genome of Cherskii's sculpin Cottus czerskii (Dxy = 0.0135 ± 0.0008; Han et al. 2016). The average level of mt genome divergence (Dxy) between six species within the genus Cottus (Figure 1) is 0.0977 ± 0.0015, which is significantly higher than the level of divergence between C. szanaga and C. czerskii. This discrepancy could suggest that C. szanaga and C. czerskii are not distinct biological species. There are however 223 single nucleotide and four indel differences between the C. szanaga and C. czerskii genomes, including a 17-bp insertion (CCCTTCGCCTCCCCCCCC) located within the non-coding region at coordinates 7170–7186 (between tRNA-Asp and COX2). Interestingly, the same insertion is present in the mt genome of C. hangiongensis (EU332751; Figure 1), which makes it difficult to explain these differences by either sequencing mistakes and/or intraspecific variability. The low level of sequence divergence between C. szanaga and C. czerskii could be explained by recent divergence or historical hybridization, as has been found in other fishes including sculpins (Baumsteiger et al. 2014); or due to the presence of a new unrecognized taxonomical unit close to C. szanaga, erroneously identified as C. czerskii. Obviously, more data from the nuclear genomes are necessary to draw a definite picture of the composition and relationship between the sculpins in eastern Asia.
Figure 1.

Maximum likelihood tree for the Amur sculpin Cottus szanaga specimens CSZID2 and CSZIF3, and GenBank representatives of the family Cottidae. The tree is constructed using whole mitogenome sequences and is based on the General Time Reversible + gamma + invariant sites (GTR + G + I) model of nucleotide substitution. The numbers at the nodes are bootstrap percent probability values based on 1000 replications. The GenBank species name for the accession number EU332750 is in parentheses.

Maximum likelihood tree for the Amur sculpin Cottus szanaga specimens CSZID2 and CSZIF3, and GenBank representatives of the family Cottidae. The tree is constructed using whole mitogenome sequences and is based on the General Time Reversible + gamma + invariant sites (GTR + G + I) model of nucleotide substitution. The numbers at the nodes are bootstrap percent probability values based on 1000 replications. The GenBank species name for the accession number EU332750 is in parentheses.
  3 in total

1.  Complex phylogeography and historical hybridization between sister taxa of freshwater sculpin (Cottus).

Authors:  Jason Baumsteiger; Andrew P Kinziger; Stewart B Reid; Andres Aguilar
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  The complete mitochondrial genome of Cherskii's sculpin (Cottus czerskii) (Scorpaeniformes: Cottidae).

Authors:  Xiaomin Han; Cheng Li; Shuai Zhao; Chunzhu Xu
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 1.514

3.  Conserved PCR primer set designing for closely-related species to complete mitochondrial genome sequencing using a sliding window-based PSO algorithm.

Authors:  Cheng-Hong Yang; Hsueh-Wei Chang; Chang-Hsuan Ho; Yii-Cheng Chou; Li-Yeh Chuang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.