Literature DB >> 33644118

Efficiency and Power Limits of Electrical and Tendon-Sheath Transmissions for Surgical Robotics.

Christopher R Wagner1, Evangelos Emmanouil1.   

Abstract

A popular design choice in current surgical robotics is to use mechanical cables to transmit mechanical energy from actuators located outside of the body, through a minimally invasive port, to instruments on the inside of the body. These cables enable high performance surgical manipulations including high bandwidth control, precision position control, and high force ability. However, cable drives become less efficient for longer distances, for paths that involve continuous curves, and for transmissions involving multiple degrees of freedom. In this paper, we consider the design tradeoffs for two methods of transmitting power through an access port with limited cross sectional area and curved paths - tendon/sheath mechanical transmissions and electrical wire transmissions. We develop a series of analytic models examining fundamental limits of efficiency, force and power as constrained by access geometry, material properties, and safety limits of heat and electrical hazards for these two transmission types. These models are used to investigate the potential of achieving the required mechanical power requirements needed for surgery with smaller access ports and more difficult access pathways. We show that an electrical transmission is a viable way of delivering more than sufficient power needed for surgery, highlighting the opportunity for next-generation actuators to enable more minimally invasive surgical devices.
Copyright © 2018 Wagner and Emmanouil.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cable drives; efficiency; minimally invasive surgery; shape memory alloy (SMA); surgical robotics; tendon sheath transmissions

Year:  2018        PMID: 33644118      PMCID: PMC7904316          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  8 in total

1.  Quantifying surgeon grasping mechanics in laparoscopy using the Blue DRAGON system.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Brown; Jacob Rosen; Lily Chang; Mika N Sinanan; Blake Hannaford
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

Review 2.  A technical review of flexible endoscopic multitasking platforms.

Authors:  Baldwin Po Man Yeung; Terence Gourlay
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 6.071

3.  Effects of perfusion on the viscoelastic characteristics of liver.

Authors:  Amy E Kerdok; Mark P Ottensmeyer; Robert D Howe
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm.

Authors:  Michael F McGee; Michael J Rosen; Jeffrey Marks; Raymond P Onders; Amitabh Chak; Ashley Faulx; Victor K Chen; Jeffrey Ponsky
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar.

Authors:  R Tacchino; F Greco; D Matera
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Review of temperature dependence of thermal properties, dielectric properties, and perfusion of biological tissues at hyperthermic and ablation temperatures.

Authors:  Christian Rossmanna; Dieter Haemmerich
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2014

Review 7.  Scar-free healing: from embryonic mechanisms to adult therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Mark W J Ferguson; Sharon O'Kane
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Pneumatic-type surgical robot end-effector for laparoscopic surgical-operation-by-wire.

Authors:  Chiwon Lee; Woo Jung Park; Myungjoon Kim; Seungwoo Noh; Chiyul Yoon; Choonghee Lee; Youdan Kim; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Hee Chan Kim; Sungwan Kim
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 2.819

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.