Literature DB >> 33643761

Supplementation of Bacillus subtilis GM5 enhances broiler body weight gain and modulates cecal microbiota.

Guzel Hadieva1, Marat Lutfullin1, Daria Pudova1, Yaw Akosah1, Elena Shagimardanova2, Natalia Gogoleva2,3, Margarita Sharipova1, Ayslu Mardanova1.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of the strain Bacillus subtilis GM5 on growth, feed conversion, and the composition of cecum microbiota in broiler chickens. Half of which received a control diet, while the other half was fed a diet supplemented with GM5 spores. Cecal contents on days 1, 10, and 42 were subjected to metataxonomic analysis. Principal Component Analysis showed that the control and probiotic groups formed three separate clusters, indicating changes, which occurred gradually in microbial communities. On day 1, Firmicutes (53.87-57.61%) and Proteobacteria (43.77-38.93%) were prevalent in both groups, whereas samples of days 10 and 42 were predominantly occupied by Firmicutes (54.55-81.79%) and Bacteroidetes (26.94-30.45%). In the group of chickens treated with probiotic, the average daily gain in body weight was higher, while feed conversion decreased by 1.44%. A surge in the presence of beneficial bacteria of the Ruminococcaceae family was observed. The introduction of the probiotic led to an elevated Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, which positively correlated with chickens' bodyweight (Spearman ρ = 1.0, P < 0.05). Supplementing broiler feed with B. subtilis GM5 spores leads to improved feed intake and digestibility, which is paramount in reducing the cost of the final product. Thus, the probiotic strain GM5 modulates the cecal microbiota of broiler chickens and increases microbial diversity, which is well exhibited on the 42nd day. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-020-02634-2. © King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA gene; Broiler; Cecum; GIT of chickens; Metataxonomic; Probiotics

Year:  2021        PMID: 33643761      PMCID: PMC7882658          DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-02634-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  3 Biotech        ISSN: 2190-5738            Impact factor:   2.406


  47 in total

Review 1.  The chicken gastrointestinal microbiome.

Authors:  Brian B Oakley; Hyun S Lillehoj; Michael H Kogut; Woo K Kim; John J Maurer; Adriana Pedroso; Margie D Lee; Stephen R Collett; Timothy J Johnson; Nelson A Cox
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Effect of in ovo administration of an adult-derived microbiota on establishment of the intestinal microbiome in chickens.

Authors:  Adriana A Pedroso; Amy B Batal; Margie D Lee
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.156

3.  Efficacy of protected sodium butyrate, a protected blend of essential oils, their combination, and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens spore suspension against artificially induced necrotic enteritis in broilers.

Authors:  A Jerzsele; K Szeker; R Csizinszky; E Gere; C Jakab; J J Mallo; P Galfi
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Bacterial Succession in the Broiler Gastrointestinal Tract.

Authors:  Samir Ranjitkar; Blair Lawley; Gerald Tannock; Ricarda M Engberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Farm Stage, Bird Age, and Body Site Dominantly Affect the Quantity, Taxonomic Composition, and Dynamics of Respiratory and Gut Microbiota of Commercial Layer Chickens.

Authors:  John M Ngunjiri; Kara J M Taylor; Michael C Abundo; Hyesun Jang; Mohamed Elaish; Mahesh Kc; Amir Ghorbani; Saranga Wijeratne; Bonnie P Weber; Timothy J Johnson; Chang-Won Lee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Diversity and succession of the intestinal bacterial community of the maturing broiler chicken.

Authors:  Jiangrang Lu; Umelaalim Idris; Barry Harmon; Charles Hofacre; John J Maurer; Margie D Lee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Fumonisins affect the intestinal microbial homeostasis in broiler chickens, predisposing to necrotic enteritis.

Authors:  Gunther Antonissen; Siska Croubels; Frank Pasmans; Richard Ducatelle; Venessa Eeckhaut; Mathias Devreese; Marc Verlinden; Freddy Haesebrouck; Mia Eeckhout; Sarah De Saeger; Birgit Antlinger; Barbara Novak; An Martel; Filip Van Immerseel
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.683

8.  Successional changes in the chicken cecal microbiome during 42 days of growth are independent of organic acid feed additives.

Authors:  Brian B Oakley; R Jeff Buhr; Casey W Ritz; Brian H Kiepper; Mark E Berrang; Bruce S Seal; Nelson A Cox
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Whole genome sequencing and function prediction of 133 gut anaerobes isolated from chicken caecum in pure cultures.

Authors:  Matej Medvecky; Darina Cejkova; Ondrej Polansky; Daniela Karasova; Tereza Kubasova; Alois Cizek; Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Metagenomic Analysis of Chicken Gut Microbiota for Improving Metabolism and Health of Chickens - A Review.

Authors:  Ki Young Choi; Tae Kwon Lee; Woo Jun Sul
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.509

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of a probiotic containing lactobacilli and bifidobacteria on the metabolic processes, litter microbiocenosis, and production indicators of broiler Pekin ducklings.

Authors:  Ayrat Khabirov; Ruzil Avzalov; Gulnara Tsapalova; Alexandra Andreeva; Almaz Basharov
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-04-20

2.  Feeding Bacillus subtilis ATCC19659 to Broiler Chickens Enhances Growth Performance and Immune Function by Modulating Intestinal Morphology and Cecum Microbiota.

Authors:  Taha M Mohamed; Weizhong Sun; Gifty Z Bumbie; Abdelmotaleb A Elokil; Khaled Abuelezz Fouad Mohammed; Rao Zebin; Ping Hu; Liuting Wu; Zhiru Tang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  A Minority Population of Non-dye-decolorizing Bacillus subtilis enhances the Azo Dye-decolorizing Activity of Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Yu Yamanashi; Tsukasa Ito
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.596

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.