Literature DB >> 33643665

Effectiveness of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Applied to 360° vs. 180° of the Angle.

Abraham Nirappel1, Emma Klug2, Rebecca Ye2, Nathan Hall2, Marika Chachanidze2, Ta C Chang3, David Solá-Del Valle2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of 360° and 180° of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) for the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP).
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. The main outcome measure was the Kaplan-Meier analysis comparing the cumulative probabilities of survival between the 360° and 180° SLT groups in terms of IOP reduction. Success was defined as ≥20% IOP reduction from baseline with an IOP between 5-18 mmHg and ≤1 glaucoma medication added postoperatively. Additional outcome measures included changes in average IOP, number of glaucoma medications, and the incidence of postoperative IOP spikes. Measurements were obtained at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-eight eyes of 258 patients were included in the 360° group, and 196 eyes of 196 patients were included in the 180° group. The mean IOP reductions at 2 years were 2.21 ± 2.02 mmHg and 2.43 ± 1.81 mmHg (p=0.33) in the 180° and 360° groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative IOP spikes between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the survival curves of the two groups (p=0.035). The Cox proportional-hazard model indicated that 360° of SLT application was a significant predictor of long-term success (p=0.030).
CONCLUSIONS: 360° of SLT application seems to provide for greater long-term IOP control than 180° of application without putting patients at an elevated risk for postoperative IOP spikes.
Copyright © 2021 Abraham Nirappel et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33643665      PMCID: PMC7902141          DOI: 10.1155/2021/8860601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2090-004X            Impact factor:   1.909


  14 in total

1.  Clinical results of selective laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma in Japanese eyes: comparison of 180 degree with 360 degree SLT.

Authors:  Maho Shibata; Tetsuya Sugiyama; Osamu Ishida; Mari Ueki; Shota Kojima; Takaaki Okuda; Tsunehiko Ikeda
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A randomised, prospective study comparing selective laser trabeculoplasty with latanoprost for the control of intraocular pressure in ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  M Nagar; A Ogunyomade; D P S O'Brart; F Howes; J Marshall
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  A comparison of the intervisit intraocular pressure fluctuation after 180 and 360 degrees of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) as a primary therapy in primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Navin Prasad; Shashidhar Murthy; John J Dagianis; Mark A Latina
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Mechanisms of selective laser trabeculoplasty: a review.

Authors:  Dov B Kagan; Nathan S Gorfinkel; Cindy M L Hutnik
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Effect of primary selective laser trabeculoplasty on tonographic outflow facility: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Saurabh Goyal; Laura Beltran-Agullo; Safina Rashid; Shaheen P Shah; Remin Nath; Adanna Obi; K Sheng Lim
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Evaluation of selective laser trabeculoplasty as an intraocular pressure lowering option.

Authors:  Yuri Belitsky; Dragana Škiljić; Madeleine Zetterberg; Lada Kalaboukhova
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  Primary Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty for Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: Clinical Outcomes, Predictors of Success, and Safety from the Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Trial.

Authors:  Anurag Garg; Victoria Vickerstaff; Neil Nathwani; David Garway-Heath; Evgenia Konstantakopoulou; Gareth Ambler; Catey Bunce; Richard Wormald; Keith Barton; Gus Gazzard
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Comparison of the effects of 180° and 360° applications of selective laser trabeculoplasty on intraocular pressure and cornea.

Authors:  Bediz Özen; Hakan Öztürk; Berna Yüce
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Mechanism of Action of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty and Predictors of Response.

Authors:  Vikas Gulati; Shan Fan; Bret J Gardner; Shane J Havens; Marie T Schaaf; Donna G Neely; Carol B Toris
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 10.  A Review of the Clinical Usefulness of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Exfoliative Glaucoma.

Authors:  Andreas Katsanos; Anastasios G Konstas; Dimitrios G Mikropoulos; Luciano Quaranta; Irini C Voudouragkaki; Georgios P Athanasopoulos; Ioannis Asproudis; Miguel A Teus
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.845

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: "The Hype Is Real".

Authors:  Tomislav Sarenac; Anela Bečić Turkanović; Peter Ferme; Tomaž Gračner
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.