Literature DB >> 33643361

Molecular Tools for Adapting Viticulture to Climate Change.

Éric Gomès1, Pascale Maillot2,3, Éric Duchêne2.   

Abstract

Adaptation of viticulture to climate change includes exploration of new geographical areas, new training systems, new management practices, or new varieties, both for rootstocks and scions. Molecular tools can be defined as molecular approaches used to study DNAs, RNAs, and proteins in all living organisms. We present here the current knowledge about molecular tools and their potential usefulness in three aspects of grapevine adaptation to the ongoing climate change. (i) Molecular tools for understanding grapevine response to environmental stresses. A fine description of the regulation of gene expression is a powerful tool to understand the physiological mechanisms set up by the grapevine to respond to abiotic stress such as high temperatures or drought. The current knowledge on gene expression is continuously evolving with increasing evidence of the role of alternative splicing, small RNAs, long non-coding RNAs, DNA methylation, or chromatin activity. (ii) Genetics and genomics of grapevine stress tolerance. The description of the grapevine genome is more and more precise. The genetic variations among genotypes are now revealed with new technologies with the sequencing of very long DNA molecules. High throughput technologies for DNA sequencing also allow now the genetic characterization at the same time of hundreds of genotypes for thousands of points in the genome, which provides unprecedented datasets for genotype-phenotype associations studies. We review the current knowledge on the genetic determinism of traits for the adaptation to climate change. We focus on quantitative trait loci and molecular markers available for developmental stages, tolerance to water stress/water use efficiency, sugar content, acidity, and secondary metabolism of the berries. (iii) Controlling the genome and its expression to allow breeding of better-adapted genotypes. High-density DNA genotyping can be used to select genotypes with specific interesting alleles but genomic selection is also a powerful method able to take into account the genetic information along the whole genome to predict a phenotype. Modern technologies are also able to generate mutations that are possibly interesting for generating new phenotypes but the most promising one is the direct editing of the genome at a precise location.
Copyright © 2021 Gomès, Maillot and Duchêne.

Entities:  

Keywords:  QTL; adaptation; climate change; gene expression; grapevine; molecular tools

Year:  2021        PMID: 33643361      PMCID: PMC7902699          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.633846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


  175 in total

1.  The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla.

Authors:  Olivier Jaillon; Jean-Marc Aury; Benjamin Noel; Alberto Policriti; Christian Clepet; Alberto Casagrande; Nathalie Choisne; Sébastien Aubourg; Nicola Vitulo; Claire Jubin; Alessandro Vezzi; Fabrice Legeai; Philippe Hugueney; Corinne Dasilva; David Horner; Erica Mica; Delphine Jublot; Julie Poulain; Clémence Bruyère; Alain Billault; Béatrice Segurens; Michel Gouyvenoux; Edgardo Ugarte; Federica Cattonaro; Véronique Anthouard; Virginie Vico; Cristian Del Fabbro; Michaël Alaux; Gabriele Di Gaspero; Vincent Dumas; Nicoletta Felice; Sophie Paillard; Irena Juman; Marco Moroldo; Simone Scalabrin; Aurélie Canaguier; Isabelle Le Clainche; Giorgio Malacrida; Eléonore Durand; Graziano Pesole; Valérie Laucou; Philippe Chatelet; Didier Merdinoglu; Massimo Delledonne; Mario Pezzotti; Alain Lecharny; Claude Scarpelli; François Artiguenave; M Enrico Pè; Giorgio Valle; Michele Morgante; Michel Caboche; Anne-Françoise Adam-Blondon; Jean Weissenbach; Francis Quétier; Patrick Wincker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Cloning and characterization of small non-coding RNAs from grape.

Authors:  Andrea Carra; Erica Mica; Giorgio Gambino; Massimo Pindo; Claudio Moser; Mario Enrico Pè; Andrea Schubert
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 3.  Epigenetics for Plant Improvement: Current Knowledge and Modeling Avenues.

Authors:  Philippe Gallusci; Zhanwu Dai; Michel Génard; Arnaud Gauffretau; Nathalie Leblanc-Fournier; Céline Richard-Molard; Denis Vile; Sophie Brunel-Muguet
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 4.  Exploring miRNAs for developing climate-resilient crops: A perspective review.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Qin-Min Hou; Tushar Khare; Sandeep Kumar Verma; Vinay Kumar
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Vineyard environments influence Malbec grapevine phenotypic traits and DNA methylation patterns in a clone-dependent way.

Authors:  Carlos F Marfil; Federico J Berli; Anabella Varela; Verónica N Ibañez; Rodrigo Alonso; Diego Zavallo; Sebastián Asurmendi; Sebastián Gomez Talquenca
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 4.570

6.  Temperature desynchronizes sugar and organic acid metabolism in ripening grapevine fruits and remodels their transcriptome.

Authors:  Markus Rienth; Laurent Torregrosa; Gautier Sarah; Morgane Ardisson; Jean-Marc Brillouet; Charles Romieu
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  DNA-Free Genetically Edited Grapevine and Apple Protoplast Using CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoproteins.

Authors:  Mickael Malnoy; Roberto Viola; Min-Hee Jung; Ok-Jae Koo; Seokjoong Kim; Jin-Soo Kim; Riccardo Velasco; Chidananda Nagamangala Kanchiswamy
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 8.  Emerging roles of histone modifications and HDACs in RNA splicing.

Authors:  Raneen Rahhal; Edward Seto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Heritability and Reversibility of DNA Methylation Induced by in vitro Grafting between Brassica juncea and B. oleracea.

Authors:  Liwen Cao; Ningning Yu; Junxing Li; Zhenyu Qi; Dan Wang; Liping Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  CRISPR artificial splicing factors.

Authors:  Menghan Du; Nathaniel Jillette; Jacqueline Jufen Zhu; Sheng Li; Albert Wu Cheng
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  4 in total

1.  Adapting Grapevine Productivity and Fitness to Water Deficit by Means of Naturalized Rootstocks.

Authors:  Emilio Villalobos-Soublett; Nicolás Verdugo-Vásquez; Irina Díaz; Andrés Zurita-Silva
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  CRISPR/Cas9 Targeted Editing of Genes Associated With Fungal Susceptibility in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Thompson Seedless Using Geminivirus-Derived Replicons.

Authors:  Felipe Olivares; Rodrigo Loyola; Blanca Olmedo; María de Los Ángeles Miccono; Carlos Aguirre; Ricardo Vergara; Danae Riquelme; Gabriela Madrid; Philippe Plantat; Roxana Mora; Daniel Espinoza; Humberto Prieto
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Expression Analyses in the Rachis Hint towards Major Cell Wall Modifications in Grape Clusters Showing Berry Shrivel Symptoms.

Authors:  Stefania Savoi; Suriyan Supapvanich; Heinrich Hildebrand; Nancy Stralis-Pavese; Astrid Forneck; David P Kreil; Michaela Griesser
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-19

4.  Alternative splicing regulation appears to play a crucial role in grape berry development and is also potentially involved in adaptation responses to the environment.

Authors:  Pascale Maillot; Amandine Velt; Camille Rustenholz; Gisèle Butterlin; Didier Merdinoglu; Eric Duchêne
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 4.215

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.