Literature DB >> 33643248

Microbial Communities in Flexible Biomethanation of Hydrogen Are Functionally Resilient Upon Starvation.

Washington Logroño1, Denny Popp1, Marcell Nikolausz1, Paul Kluge1, Hauke Harms1, Sabine Kleinsteuber1.   

Abstract

Ex situ biomethanation allows the conversion of hydrogen produced from surplus electricity to methane. The flexibility of the process was recently demonstrated, yet it is unknown how intermittent hydrogen feeding impacts the functionality of the microbial communities. We investigated the effect of starvation events on the hydrogen consumption and methane production rates (MPRs) of two different methanogenic communities that were fed with hydrogen and carbon dioxide. Both communities showed functional resilience in terms of hydrogen consumption and MPRs upon starvation periods of up to 14 days. The origin of the inoculum, community structure and dominant methanogens were decisive for high gas conversion rates. Thus, pre-screening a well performing inoculum is essential to ensure the efficiency of biomethanation systems operating under flexible gas feeding regimes. Our results suggest that the type of the predominant hydrogenotrophic methanogen (here: Methanobacterium) is important for an efficient process. We also show that flexible biomethanation of hydrogen and carbon dioxide with complex microbiota is possible while avoiding the accumulation of acetate, which is relevant for practical implementation. In our study, the inoculum from an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating wastewater from paper industry performed better compared to the inoculum from a plug flow reactor treating cow manure and corn silage. Therefore, the implementation of the power-to-gas concept in wastewater treatment plants of the paper industry, where biocatalytic biomass is readily available, may be a viable option to reduce the carbon footprint of the paper industry.
Copyright © 2021 Logroño, Popp, Nikolausz, Kluge, Harms and Kleinsteuber.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Methanobacterium; anaerobic digester; biogas upgrading; biomethane; hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis; intermittent feeding; power-to-gas; wastewater treatment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33643248      PMCID: PMC7904901          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.619632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


  27 in total

1.  Growth of syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacteria with fumarate in the absence of methanogenic bacteria.

Authors:  A J Stams; J B Van Dijk; C Dijkema; C M Plugge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A critical evaluation of ecological indices for the comparative analysis of microbial communities based on molecular datasets.

Authors:  Rico Lucas; Jürgen Groeneveld; Hauke Harms; Karin Johst; Karin Frank; Sabine Kleinsteuber
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 4.194

3.  Reactor configuration influences microbial community structure during high-rate, low-temperature anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewater.

Authors:  Paul G McAteer; Anna Christine Trego; Camilla Thorn; Therese Mahony; Florence Abram; Vincent O'Flaherty
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  Influence of operating pressure on the biological hydrogen methanation in trickle-bed reactors.

Authors:  Timo Ullrich; Jonas Lindner; Katharina Bär; Friedemann Mörs; Frank Graf; Andreas Lemmer
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 9.642

5.  Biocatalytic methanation of hydrogen and carbon dioxide in an anaerobic three-phase system.

Authors:  M Burkhardt; T Koschack; G Busch
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 9.642

6.  Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies.

Authors:  Anna Klindworth; Elmar Pruesse; Timmy Schweer; Jörg Peplies; Christian Quast; Matthias Horn; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Modeling methanogenesis with a genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of Methanosarcina barkeri.

Authors:  Adam M Feist; Johannes C M Scholten; Bernhard Ø Palsson; Fred J Brockman; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 11.429

8.  Flux measurements and maintenance energy for carbon dioxide utilization by Methanococcus maripaludis.

Authors:  Nishu Goyal; Mrutyunjay Padhiary; Iftekhar A Karimi; Zhi Zhou
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.328

9.  Microbial Resource Management for Ex Situ Biomethanation of Hydrogen at Alkaline pH.

Authors:  Washington Logroño; Denny Popp; Sabine Kleinsteuber; Heike Sträuber; Hauke Harms; Marcell Nikolausz
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-24

10.  FunGene: the functional gene pipeline and repository.

Authors:  Jordan A Fish; Benli Chai; Qiong Wang; Yanni Sun; C Titus Brown; James M Tiedje; James R Cole
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Enrichment of Anaerobic Microbial Communities from Midgut and Hindgut of Sun Beetle Larvae (Pachnoda marginata) on Wheat Straw: Effect of Inoculum Preparation.

Authors:  Bruna Grosch Schroeder; Washington Logroño; Ulisses Nunes da Rocha; Hauke Harms; Marcell Nikolausz
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-03-31

2.  Physiological Effects of 2-Bromoethanesulfonate on Hydrogenotrophic Pure and Mixed Cultures.

Authors:  Washington Logroño; Marcell Nikolausz; Hauke Harms; Sabine Kleinsteuber
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-02-03

3.  Early response of methanogenic archaea to H2 as evaluated by metagenomics and metatranscriptomics.

Authors:  Balázs Kakuk; Roland Wirth; Gergely Maróti; Márk Szuhaj; Gábor Rakhely; Krisztián Laczi; Kornél L Kovács; Zoltán Bagi
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 5.328

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.