Arlete Modelli1,2, Viviane P Candal Setti1, Martinus Theodorus van de Bilt1,3, Wagner Farid Gattaz1,3, Alexandre Andrade Loch1,3, Wulf Rössler1,3,4,5. 1. Laboratory of Neuroscience (LIM 27), Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 2. Psychology and Neuropsychology Service, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Universidade de São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. 3. Instituto Nacional de Biomarcadores em Neuropsiquiatria (INBION), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnológico, São Paulo, Brazil. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
Introduction: The public stigma and self-stigma contribute to the dilemma of disclosing or not one's own mental illness diagnosis. Studies suggest that revealing it diminishes stress, besides helping with self-esteem. Honest, Open, Proud (HOP) is a group program that aids in the process of deciding on it, reducing its impact. Considering the relevance of this issue, the present study aimed to apply a HOP-based intervention in a group of patients diagnosed with mood disorders. Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was used, including 61 patients with mood disorders, of whom 31 were diagnosed with depression and 30 were diagnosed with bipolar disorder. They were randomly placed on the intervention (HOP) or the control group (unstructured psychoeducation). The evaluations occurred before (T0) and after (T1) the sessions. We administered eight scales, from which three presented relevant results: Coming Out with Mental Illness Scale (COMIS), Cognitive Appraisal of Stigma as a Stressor (CogApp), and Authenticity Scale. Results: The intervention groups (depression and bipolar) did not present a significant change regarding the decision to disclose their diagnostics. However, the depression group showed a decrease on the perception of stigma as a stressor (T0 = 0.50 vs. T1 = -1.45; p = 0.058). Improvements in post-intervention results were seen for both groups (depression and bipolar) on the Authenticity Scale-self-alienation subscale (T0 = 10.40 vs. T1 = 12.37, p = 0.058). Conclusion: Our HOP-based intervention appeared to be an important program to aid patients in facing stigma stress, showing positive effects, whether helping to diminish stress or to improve self-conscience, both of which have indirect effects on self-stigma. As it is a compact program, it can bring benefits when applying to public health institutions.
RCT Entities:
Introduction: The public stigma and self-stigma contribute to the dilemma of disclosing or not one's own mental illness diagnosis. Studies suggest that revealing it diminishes stress, besides helping with self-esteem. Honest, Open, Proud (HOP) is a group program that aids in the process of deciding on it, reducing its impact. Considering the relevance of this issue, the present study aimed to apply a HOP-based intervention in a group of patients diagnosed with mood disorders. Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was used, including 61 patients with mood disorders, of whom 31 were diagnosed with depression and 30 were diagnosed with bipolar disorder. They were randomly placed on the intervention (HOP) or the control group (unstructured psychoeducation). The evaluations occurred before (T0) and after (T1) the sessions. We administered eight scales, from which three presented relevant results: Coming Out with Mental Illness Scale (COMIS), Cognitive Appraisal of Stigma as a Stressor (CogApp), and Authenticity Scale. Results: The intervention groups (depression and bipolar) did not present a significant change regarding the decision to disclose their diagnostics. However, the depression group showed a decrease on the perception of stigma as a stressor (T0 = 0.50 vs. T1 = -1.45; p = 0.058). Improvements in post-intervention results were seen for both groups (depression and bipolar) on the Authenticity Scale-self-alienation subscale (T0 = 10.40 vs. T1 = 12.37, p = 0.058). Conclusion: Our HOP-based intervention appeared to be an important program to aid patients in facing stigma stress, showing positive effects, whether helping to diminish stress or to improve self-conscience, both of which have indirect effects on self-stigma. As it is a compact program, it can bring benefits when applying to public health institutions.
Authors: M P Hengartner; A A Loch; F L Lawson; F B Guarniero; Y-P Wang; W Rössler; W F Gattaz Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 6.892
Authors: Nadine Mulfinger; Sabine Müller; Isabel Böge; Vehbi Sakar; Patrick W Corrigan; Sara Evans-Lacko; Luise Nehf; Julia Djamali; Anna Samarelli; Michael Kempter; Christian Ruckes; Gerhard Libal; Nathalie Oexle; Michele Noterdaeme; Nicolas Rüsch Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: D A Perlick; R A Rosenheck; J F Clarkin; J A Sirey; J Salahi; E L Struening; B G Link Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Patrick W Corrigan; Patrick J Michaels; Eduardo Vega; Michael Gause; Amy C Watson; Nicolas Rüsch Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 3.222