Literature DB >> 33642798

Validation of real-time polymerase chain reaction versus conventional polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle sera.

Nour H Abdel-Hamid1, Eman I M Beleta1, Mohamed A Kelany2, Rania I Ismail1, Nadia A Shalaby1, Manal H M Khafagi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques have and are still being used for the direct detection of Brucella DNA in serum samples of different animal species and humans without being validated or properly validated, resulting in discrepancies. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the TaqMan Real-Time-PCR (RT-PCR) targeting the bcsp31 gene versus conventional PCR for the accurate diagnosis of brucellosis at the genus level in cattle sera.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eighty-four serum samples were collected from bacteriologically positive and negative cows with ages ranging from 1 to 5 years old at some infected private farms in the Nile Delta under quarantine measures as well as brucellosis free farms. These samples were classified into four groups after serological diagnosis and investigated by TaqMan RT-PCR and conventional PCR targeting the IS711 gene for Brucella DNA detection. The diagnostic performance characteristics of both PCR techniques were estimated considering the bacteriological results as a gold standard.
RESULTS: TaqMan RT-PCR revealed superiority over conventional PCR; it was able to detect Brucella DNA in 95% (67/70) and 89% (25/28) of the cattle sera samples belonging to Group 1 (serologically and bacteriologically positive) and Group 2 (serologically negative but bacteriologically positive), respectively. On evaluating the diagnostic performance, TaqMan RT-PCR showed superior diagnostic sensitivity (93.9%), diagnostic specificity (88.4%), performance index (182.3), almost perfect kappa agreement (0.825±0.042), strong positive correlation (r=0.826), high accuracy based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the ROC curve (0.911) at p<0.05 and CI of 95%.
CONCLUSION: A cattle serum sample is not the metric of choice for targeting Brucella genomic DNA by conventional PCR. The time-saving and rapid TaqMan RT-PCR method revealed a better diagnostic performance in the detection of Brucella DNA in cattle sera. Such performance offered by TaqMan RT-PCR may be considered a step toward the possibility of using such technology in the direct differentiation between Brucella-infected and -vaccinated cattle immunized by smooth vaccines from cattle sera using primers specific for such vaccines. Copyright: © Abdel-Hamid, et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brucella; TaqMan real-time-polymerase chain reaction; bacteriological results; conventional polymerase chain reaction; diagnostic sensitivity; diagnostic specificity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33642798      PMCID: PMC7896886          DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.144-154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet World        ISSN: 0972-8988


  29 in total

1.  Comparison of different PCR methods for detection of Brucella spp. in human blood samples.

Authors:  Hisham H Al-Ajlan; Abdelnasser S S Ibrahim; Ali A Al-Salamah
Journal:  Pol J Microbiol       Date:  2011

2.  Optimization and validation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction protocol for the diagnosis of human brucellosis.

Authors:  Hasan Zeybek; Ziya Cibali Acikgoz; Tuba Dal; Rıza Durmaz
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  Brucella infection in fresh water fish: Evidence for natural infection of Nile catfish, Clarias gariepinus, with Brucella melitensis.

Authors:  Wael F El-Tras; Ahmed A Tayel; Mahmoud M Eltholth; Javier Guitian
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Quantitative polymerase chain reaction based quantification of Brucella DNA in serum of pre- and post-therapeutic occupationally exposed infected human population.

Authors:  Shalini Thakur; Jasbir S Bedi; Randhir Singh; Jatinder P S Gill; Anil K Arora; Neeraj Kashyap
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Differentiation of Brucella abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4, Brucella melitensis, Brucella ovis, and Brucella suis bv. 1 by PCR.

Authors:  B J Bricker; S M Halling
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Real-time PCR for identification of Brucella spp.: a comparative study of IS711, bcsp31 and per target genes.

Authors:  Lotfi Bounaadja; David Albert; Benoît Chénais; Sylvie Hénault; Michel S Zygmunt; Sylvie Poliak; Bruno Garin-Bastuji
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-04       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Real-time PCR detection of Brucella abortus: a comparative study of SYBR green I, 5'-exonuclease, and hybridization probe assays.

Authors:  D T Newby; T L Hadfield; F F Roberto
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparison of SYBR Green and TaqMan methods in quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of four adenosine receptor subtypes.

Authors:  Mohamadhasan Tajadini; Mojtaba Panjehpour; Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2014-02-28

9.  Seroepidemiology and the Molecular Detection of Animal Brucellosis in Punjab, Pakistan.

Authors:  Usama Saeed; Shahzad Ali; Tahir Mahmood Khan; Hosny El-Adawy; Falk Melzer; Aman Ullah Khan; Anam Iftikhar; Heinrich Neubauer
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-10-13

10.  Genetic variation of Brucella isolates at strain level in Egypt.

Authors:  Nour H Abdel-Hamid; Essam M El-Bauomy; Hazem M Ghobashy; Abeer A Shehata
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.