Literature DB >> 33642788

Comparison of two attenuated infectious bursal disease vaccine strains focused on safety and antibody response in commercial broilers.

Thotsapol Thomrongsuwannakij1, Nataya Charoenvisal2, Niwat Chansiripornchai2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Infectious bursal disease (IBD) or Gumboro disease is one of the most detrimental diseases in the poultry industry worldwide. Previous scientific studies have shown that live IBD vaccination might induce transient immunosuppression, leading to suboptimal vaccine responses, and therefore lack of protection against other infectious diseases; therefore, selecting an IBD vaccine in commercial farms is a concern. This study aims to compare two commercially attenuated IBD vaccines (intermediate and intermediate-plus strains) in terms of safety and antibody response to IBD and Newcastle disease viruses (NDV) in commercial broilers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 216 Cobb broiler chickens were divided into three groups based on the IBD vaccine strain administered: V217 strain (Group 1), M.B. strain (Group 2), and an unvaccinated group (Group 3). Groups 1 and 2 were orally vaccinated with Hitchner B1 NDV vaccine strain 7 days after IBD vaccination. Blood samples were collected at IBD vaccination day (15 days of age) and at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days post-IBD vaccination. The immunosuppressive effects of the IBD vaccination were determined by NDV antibody response, the bursa:body weight (B:BW) ratio, and the histopathological lesion scores of the bursa of Fabricius. Phylogenetic analysis was also performed.
RESULTS: Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the M.B. strain belonged to a very virulent IBD strain, whereas the V217 strain belonged to a classical IBD virus strain. NDV antibody titers of the two vaccinated groups increased after ND vaccination, reaching their maximum at 14 days post-ND vaccination and decreasing thereafter. The V217 group presented the highest NDV humoral response from 7 days post-vaccination (dpv) to the end of the study. The mean NDV antibody titer of the V217 group was significantly (p<0.05) higher than that of the M.B. group at 14 dpv. In addition, the V217 strain-induced lower bursal lesions post-IBD vaccination and a higher B: BW ratio at 7 and 21 dpv compared to the M.B. group. The higher B: BW ratio, lower bursal lesions, and higher ND antibody response present in the V217 group indicate that the V217 strain induces lower immunosuppressive effects compared to the M.B. strain.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that IBD vaccine selection merits consideration, as avoiding the immunosuppressive effects induced by live IBD vaccination and the consequent impact on response to other vaccines is important. Copyright: © Thomrongsuwannakij, et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  broilers; immunosuppressive effects; infectious bursal disease; vaccination

Year:  2021        PMID: 33642788      PMCID: PMC7896881          DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.70-77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet World        ISSN: 0972-8988


  27 in total

1.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Evaluation of the immunogenicity, stability, pathogenicity, and immunodepressive potential of four commercial live infectious bursal disease vaccines.

Authors:  J J Giambrone; R P Clay
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Efficacy of live vaccines against serologic subtypes of infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  J J Giambrone; J Closser
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1990 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.577

4.  Pathogenicity and immunosuppressive properties of infectious bursal disease "intermediate" strains.

Authors:  L A Mazariegos; P D Lukert; J Brown
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1990 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.577

5.  Safety and efficacy of in ovo administration of infectious bursal disease viral vaccines.

Authors:  J J Giambrone; T Dormitorio; T Brown
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.577

Review 6.  Advances in vaccine research against economically important viral diseases of food animals: Infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  Daral J Jackwood
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Bilateral effects of vaccination against infectious bursal disease and Newcastle disease in specific-pathogen-free layers and commercial broiler chickens.

Authors:  Silke Rautenschlein; Christian Kraemer; Enrique Montiel; Johan Vanmarcke; Christine Haase
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.577

8.  Maternal antibody and its effect on infectious bursal disease immunization.

Authors:  S A Naqi; B Marquez; N Sahin
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1983 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.577

9.  Antigenicity, pathogenicity and immunosuppressive effect caused by a South American isolate of infectious bursal disease virus belonging to the "distinct" genetic lineage.

Authors:  Gonzalo Tomás; Ana Marandino; Céline Courtillon; Michel Amelot; Alassane Keita; Anna Pikula; Martín Hernández; Diego Hernández; Ariel Vagnozzi; Yanina Panzera; Katarzyna Domańska-Blicharz; Nicolas Eterradossi; Ruben Pérez; Sébastien Mathieu Soubies
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.378

Review 10.  Infectious bursal disease virus in poultry: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Tamiru Negash Alkie; Silke Rautenschlein
Journal:  Vet Med (Auckl)       Date:  2016-01-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.