Literature DB >> 33642773

Dynamic 18F-Fluoro-Ethyl-Tyrosine Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography: A Better Predictor of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutation in Presurgical Evaluations of Glioma.

Kamal Nitheesh Raj Tigapuram1, Kirti Gupta2, Ashwani Sood1, Navneet Singla3, Nivedita Rana1, Rakhee Vatsa1, Chirag Kamal Ahuja4, Bhagwant Rai Mittal1.   

Abstract

The recent WHO classification of gliomas has incorporated molecular markers such as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p/19q co-deletion into the ambit of morphological diagnosis, and 18F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine (18F-FET) positron emission tomography (PET) has shown its utility in noninvasive glioma grading and prognosis. Both dynamic and static FET PET parameters may assist in predicting the IDH mutational status, but time to peak derived from dynamic data may be a better predictor for IDH status. We present a case of left frontal lobe lesion suggestive of high-grade glioma on magnetic resonance imaging and static 18F-FET PET images, however, dynamic FET image was suggestive of low-grade IDH1-mutated glioma which was later confirmed on histology and immunohistochemistry. Copyright:
© 2020 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine; glioma; isocitrate dehydrogenase; positron emission tomography/computed tomography

Year:  2020        PMID: 33642773      PMCID: PMC7905266          DOI: 10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_135_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0974-0244


A 36-year-old man on anti-epileptic treatment for intermittent episodes of generalized tonic–clonic seizures, loss of consciousness, and headache was referred for further work-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain done revealed a heterogeneous T1 hypointense, T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery heterogeneously hyperintense lesion in the left frontal lobe showing increase blood flow, areas of necrosis with significant mass effect-features suggestive of high-grade glioma [Figure 1a]. 18F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine (18F-FET) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) dynamic images were acquired immediately after injection in list mode for 40 min. Dynamic image data were reconstructed with 14 frames comprising 5 frames × 1 min, 5 frames × 3 min, and 4 frames × 5 min, and a static image was reconstructed by summing the images from 20 to 40 min postinjection. The time–activity curve (TAC) from dynamic image showed a delayed time to peak (TTP) and rising curve (Type II curve) suggestive of low-grade glioma with prediction for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1)- mutated glioma [Figure 2], though static PET/CT images showed tracer-avid ill-defined enhancing subcentimetric lesion (SUVmax: 3.2) in the left prefrontal cortex [Figure 1b and c]. Histology revealed a diffuse astrocytoma (WHO Grade II) characterized by moderately pleomorphic cells set against a pale fibrillary background. No mitoses, endovascular proliferation, or necrosis was identified. On molecular subtyping, the cells were mutant for IDH1 R132H protein with loss of expression for ATRX (ATRX-mutant phenotype). No positivity was noted for p53-mutant protein [Figure 3a-d].
Figure 1

Magnetic resonance imaging axial section of the brain revealing a heterogeneous T1 postcontrast heterogeneously enhancing lesion in the left frontal lobe (a). Static images of computed tomography and fused positron emission tomography/computed tomography showing tracer-avid ill-defined enhancing subcentimetric lesion (SUVmax: 3.2) in the left prefrontal cortex (b and c)

Figure 2

Time–activity curve from dynamic image showing a delayed time to peak and rising curve (Type II curve) suggestive of low-grade glioma with prediction for isocitrate dehydrogenase 1-mutated glioma

Figure 3

Histopathology revealing a diffuse astrocytoma (WHO grade II) characterized by moderately pleomorphic cells set against a pale fibrillary background. No mitoses, endovascular proliferation, or necrosis is identified (a, H&E x200; b, H&E x400). c: Neoplastic cells revealed immunoreactivity for IDH1 R132H mutant protein; d: Loss of expression for ATRX protein (mutant phenotype). (c,d: immunoperoxidase x400)

Magnetic resonance imaging axial section of the brain revealing a heterogeneous T1 postcontrast heterogeneously enhancing lesion in the left frontal lobe (a). Static images of computed tomography and fused positron emission tomography/computed tomography showing tracer-avid ill-defined enhancing subcentimetric lesion (SUVmax: 3.2) in the left prefrontal cortex (b and c) Time–activity curve from dynamic image showing a delayed time to peak and rising curve (Type II curve) suggestive of low-grade glioma with prediction for isocitrate dehydrogenase 1-mutated glioma Histopathology revealing a diffuse astrocytoma (WHO grade II) characterized by moderately pleomorphic cells set against a pale fibrillary background. No mitoses, endovascular proliferation, or necrosis is identified (a, H&E x200; b, H&E x400). c: Neoplastic cells revealed immunoreactivity for IDH1 R132H mutant protein; d: Loss of expression for ATRX protein (mutant phenotype). (c,d: immunoperoxidase x400) Presurgical evaluation of central nervous system tumors is critical for assessing the lesion for tumor type, grade, and extent. MRI is the primary imaging investigation in the evaluation of brain tumors.[12] Recently, the WHO 2016 classification has incorporated IDH mutational status in the diagnosis of gliomas which has prognostic implications such that IDH-mutant tumors have a more favorable outcome compared to IDH wild type.[34] The noninvasive techniques to predict the molecular characteristics of tumors are increasingly being explored, and dynamic and static FET PET images have shown promising results.[56] For primary diagnosis, a cutoff threshold for SUVmax >1.6–1.8 using FET has been suggested to differentiate between high versus low-grade tumors. Increased tracer uptake is reported to have a high positive predictive value for high-grade lesions, though low-grade lesions, especially oligodendroglioma, may even show high uptake.[7] Recently, new EANM/RANO guidelines for PET imaging in gliomas suggested that dynamic parameters from FET PET/CT with assessment of TTP by measuring the time of tumor peak uptake can help in distinguishing the grade of gliomas better than static images.[7] In a study, more patients with IDH wild-type gliomas showed FET positivity (TBRmax > 1.6) with higher median TBRmax than patients of IDH-mutant gliomas, but reliable cutoff could not be achieved because of high overlap. However, dynamic data showed significantly shorter TTP for IDH wild-type gliomas with high positive predictive value.[8] The shape and TTP in the TAC on dynamic images may be indicative of tumor grade. The continuous increasing uptake in TAC is frequently observed in Grade I/II gliomas, though this pattern may also be seen in radiation-induced changes, inflammatory lesions, hematoma, or infarction.[7] In the index case, MRI and high SUVmax on static FET imaging were indicative of high-grade glioma, while dynamic FET imaging suggestive of low-grade correlated with histopathological findings suggesting that dynamic data may be more useful in predicting the molecular characteristics.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Conventional MRI evaluation of gliomas.

Authors:  N Upadhyay; A D Waldman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  European Association for Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of adult astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas.

Authors:  Michael Weller; Martin van den Bent; Jörg C Tonn; Roger Stupp; Matthias Preusser; Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal; Roger Henriksson; Emilie Le Rhun; Carmen Balana; Olivier Chinot; Martin Bendszus; Jaap C Reijneveld; Frederick Dhermain; Pim French; Christine Marosi; Colin Watts; Ingela Oberg; Geoffrey Pilkington; Brigitta G Baumert; Martin J B Taphoorn; Monika Hegi; Manfred Westphal; Guido Reifenberger; Riccardo Soffietti; Wolfgang Wick
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.

Authors:  David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 17.088

4.  Non-invasive prediction of IDH-wildtype genotype in gliomas using dynamic 18F-FET PET.

Authors:  Franziska Vettermann; Bogdana Suchorska; Marcus Unterrainer; Debie Nelwan; Robert Forbrig; Viktoria Ruf; Vera Wenter; Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth; Jochen Herms; Peter Bartenstein; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Nathalie L Albert
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Static and dynamic 18F-FET PET for the characterization of gliomas defined by IDH and 1p/19q status.

Authors:  Antoine Verger; Gabriele Stoffels; Elena K Bauer; Philipp Lohmann; Tobias Blau; Gereon R Fink; Bernd Neumaier; Nadim J Shah; Karl-Josef Langen; Norbert Galldiks
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Prognostic value of molecular and imaging biomarkers in patients with supratentorial glioma.

Authors:  Egesta Lopci; Marco Riva; Laura Olivari; Fabio Raneri; Riccardo Soffietti; Arnoldo Piccardo; Alberto Bizzi; Pierina Navarria; Anna Maria Ascolese; Roberta Rudà; Bethania Fernandes; Federico Pessina; Marco Grimaldi; Matteo Simonelli; Marco Rossi; Tommaso Alfieri; Paolo Andrea Zucali; Marta Scorsetti; Lorenzo Bello; Arturo Chiti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Glioma Groups Based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT Promoter Mutations in Tumors.

Authors:  Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Daniel H Lachance; Annette M Molinaro; Kyle M Walsh; Paul A Decker; Hugues Sicotte; Melike Pekmezci; Terri Rice; Matt L Kosel; Ivan V Smirnov; Gobinda Sarkar; Alissa A Caron; Thomas M Kollmeyer; Corinne E Praska; Anisha R Chada; Chandralekha Halder; Helen M Hansen; Lucie S McCoy; Paige M Bracci; Roxanne Marshall; Shichun Zheng; Gerald F Reis; Alexander R Pico; Brian P O'Neill; Jan C Buckner; Caterina Giannini; Jason T Huse; Arie Perry; Tarik Tihan; Mitchell S Berger; Susan M Chang; Michael D Prados; Joseph Wiemels; John K Wiencke; Margaret R Wrensch; Robert B Jenkins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 176.079

8.  Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [18F]FDG: version 1.0.

Authors:  Ian Law; Nathalie L Albert; Javier Arbizu; Ronald Boellaard; Alexander Drzezga; Norbert Galldiks; Christian la Fougère; Karl-Josef Langen; Egesta Lopci; Val Lowe; Jonathan McConathy; Harald H Quick; Bernhard Sattler; David M Schuster; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Michael Weller
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 9.236

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.