Ansley E Kenney1, Sima Zadeh Bedoya2, Cynthia A Gerhardt1,3,4, Tammi Young-Saleme1,3,4, Lori Wiener2. 1. Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH. 2. Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. 3. Department of Pediatrics and Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. 4. Department of Psychology and Neuropsychology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Clinicians and parents are encouraged to have open and honest communication about end of life with children with cancer, yet there remains limited research in this area. We examined family communication and preferred forms of support among bereaved caregivers of children with cancer. METHODS: Bereaved caregivers were recruited through a closed social media group to complete an online survey providing retrospective reports of end of life communication with their child and preferences for communication support from health-care providers. The sample of 131 participants was mostly female (77.9%; n = 102) with an average age of 49.15 (SD = 8.03) years. Deceased children were of an average age of 12.42 years (SD = 6.01) and nearly 90% of children died within 5 years of diagnosis. RESULTS: Most caregivers spoke with their child about their prognosis (61.8%; n = 131) and death (66.7%; n = 99). Half of children (48%; n = 125) asked about death, particularly older children (51.9% ≥12 years; p = 0.03). Asking about dying was related to having conversations about prognosis (p ≤ 0.001) and death (p ≤ 0.001). Most caregivers (71.8%; n = 94) wanted support to talk to their children. Fewer wanted providers to speak to children directly (12.2%; n = 16) or to be present while caregivers spoke to the child (19.8%; n = 26). Several themes emerged from a content analysis of open-ended responses regarding preferences for provider support. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Most caregivers discussed issues pertaining to end of life irrespective of demographic or medical factors. Qualitative themes provide insight into support desired by families to help with these difficult conversations.
OBJECTIVES: Clinicians and parents are encouraged to have open and honest communication about end of life with children with cancer, yet there remains limited research in this area. We examined family communication and preferred forms of support among bereaved caregivers of children with cancer. METHODS: Bereaved caregivers were recruited through a closed social media group to complete an online survey providing retrospective reports of end of life communication with their child and preferences for communication support from health-care providers. The sample of 131 participants was mostly female (77.9%; n = 102) with an average age of 49.15 (SD = 8.03) years. Deceased children were of an average age of 12.42 years (SD = 6.01) and nearly 90% of children died within 5 years of diagnosis. RESULTS: Most caregivers spoke with their child about their prognosis (61.8%; n = 131) and death (66.7%; n = 99). Half of children (48%; n = 125) asked about death, particularly older children (51.9% ≥12 years; p = 0.03). Asking about dying was related to having conversations about prognosis (p ≤ 0.001) and death (p ≤ 0.001). Most caregivers (71.8%; n = 94) wanted support to talk to their children. Fewer wanted providers to speak to children directly (12.2%; n = 16) or to be present while caregivers spoke to the child (19.8%; n = 26). Several themes emerged from a content analysis of open-ended responses regarding preferences for provider support. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Most caregivers discussed issues pertaining to end of life irrespective of demographic or medical factors. Qualitative themes provide insight into support desired by families to help with these difficult conversations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Caregiver; Communication; End of life; Oncology; Pediatric
Authors: Meaghann S Weaver; Katherine E Heinze; Katherine P Kelly; Lori Wiener; Robert L Casey; Cynthia J Bell; Joanne Wolfe; Amy M Garee; Anne Watson; Pamela S Hinds Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Momcilo Jankovic; John J Spinetta; Giuseppe Masera; Ronald D Barr; Giulio J D'Angio; Claudia Epelman; Audrey Evans; Helen Vasiliatou Kosmidis; Tim Eden Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Stuart Ekberg; Susan Danby; Johanna Rendle-Short; Anthony Herbert; Natalie K Bradford; Patsy Yates Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2018-08-31
Authors: Alan Stein; Louise Dalton; Elizabeth Rapa; Myra Bluebond-Langner; Lucy Hanington; Kim Fredman Stein; Sue Ziebland; Tamsen Rochat; Emily Harrop; Brenda Kelly; Ruth Bland Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: John J Spinetta; Momcilo Jankovic; Giuseppe Masera; Arthur R Ablin; Ronald D Barr; Myriam Weyl Ben Arush; Giulio J D'Angio; Jeanette Van Dongen-Melman; Tim Eden; Claudia Epelman; Antonio Gentil Martins; Mark L Greenberg; Helen Vasiliatou Kosmidis; Daniel Oppenheim; Paul M Zeltzer Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Sima Z Bedoya; Abigail Fry; Mallorie L Gordon; Maureen E Lyon; Jessica Thompkins; Karen Fasciano; Paige Malinowski; Corey Heath; Leonard Sender; Keri Zabokrtsky; Maryland Pao; Lori Wiener Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-06-08