Literature DB >> 33641678

Point-of-care testing for emergency assessment of coagulation in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants including edoxaban.

Florian Härtig1,2, Ingvild Birschmann3, Andreas Peter4, Sebastian Hörber4, Matthias Ebner5, Matthias Sonnleitner1,2, Charlotte Spencer1,2, Paula Bombach1,2, Maria-Ioanna Stefanou1,2, Johannes Tünnerhoff1,2, Annerose Mengel1,2, Joachim Kuhn3, Ulf Ziemann1,2, Sven Poli6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) including edoxaban are increasingly used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Despite treatment, annual stroke rate in these patients remains 1-2%. Rapid assessment of coagulation would be useful to guide thrombolysis or reversal therapy in this growing population of DOAC/edoxaban-treated stroke patients. Employing the Hemochron™ Signature Elite point-of-care test system (HC-POCT), clinically relevant plasma concentrations of dabigatran and rivaroxaban can be excluded in a blood sample. However, no data exists on the effect of edoxaban on HC-POCT results. We evaluated whether edoxaban plasma concentrations above the current treatment thresholds for thrombolysis or anticoagulation reversal (i.e., 30 and 50 ng/mL) can be ruled out with the HC-POCT.
METHODS: We prospectively studied patients receiving a first dose of edoxaban. Six blood samples were collected from each patient: before, 0.5, 1, 2, 8, and 24 h after drug intake. HC-POCT-based INR (HC-INR), activated clotting time (HC-ACT+ and HC-ACT-LR), activated partial thromboplastin time (HC-aPTT), and mass spectrometry for edoxaban plasma concentrations were performed at each time-point. We calculated correlations, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and test-specific cut-offs for ruling out edoxaban concentrations > 30 and > 50 ng/mL in a blood sample.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty blood samples from 20 edoxaban-treated patients were analyzed. Edoxaban plasma concentrations ranged from 0 to 512 ng/mL. HC-INR/HC-ACT+/HC-ACT-LR/HC-aPTT ranged from 0.7-8.3/78-310 s/65-215 s/19-93 s, and Pearson's correlation coefficients showed moderate to very strong correlations with edoxaban concentrations (r = 0.95/0.79/0.70/0.60). With areas under the ROC curve of 0.997 (95% confidence interval: 0.991-0.971) and 0.989 (0.975-1.000), HC-INR most reliably ruled out edoxaban concentrations > 30 and > 50 ng/mL, respectively, and HC-INR results ≤1.5 and ≤ 2.1 provided specificity/sensitivity of 98.6% (91.2-99.9)/98.0% (88.0-99.9) and 96.8% (88.0-99.4)/96.5% (86.8-99.4).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study represents the first systematic evaluation of the HC-POCT in edoxaban-treated patients. Applying sufficiently low assay-specific cut-offs, the HC-POCT may not only be used to reliably rule out dabigatran and rivaroxaban, but also very low edoxaban concentrations in a blood sample. Because the assay-specific cut-offs were retrospectively defined, further investigation is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT02825394 , registered on: 07/07/2016, URL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulation reversal; DOAC; Direct oral anticoagulants; NOAC; Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; POCT; Point-of-care testing; Stroke; Thrombolysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33641678      PMCID: PMC7919064          DOI: 10.1186/s42466-021-00105-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res Pract        ISSN: 2524-3489


  18 in total

1.  Performance of coagulation tests in patients on therapeutic doses of dabigatran: a cross-sectional pharmacodynamic study based on peak and trough plasma levels.

Authors:  E M Hawes; A M Deal; D Funk-Adcock; R Gosselin; C Jeanneret; A M Cook; J M Taylor; H C Whinna; A M Winkler; S Moll
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.824

2.  Reduction of the turn-around time for the measurement of rivaroxaban and apixaban: Assessment of the performance of a rapid centrifugation method.

Authors:  A-S Dincq; S Lessire; G Pirard; R Siriez; M Guldenpfennig; J Baudar; J Favresse; J Douxfils; F Mullier
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Measurement of apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban in human plasma using automated online solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and its comparison with coagulation assays.

Authors:  Joachim Kuhn; Tatjana Gripp; Tobias Flieder; Andreas Hammerschmidt; Doris Hendig; Isabel Faust; Cornelius Knabbe; Ingvild Birschmann
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.786

4.  Management of rivaroxaban- or apixaban-associated major bleeding with prothrombin complex concentrates: a cohort study.

Authors:  Ammar Majeed; Anna Ågren; Margareta Holmström; Maria Bruzelius; Roza Chaireti; Jacob Odeberg; Eva-Lotta Hempel; Maria Magnusson; Tony Frisk; Sam Schulman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

Authors:  William J Powers; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Teri Ackerson; Opeolu M Adeoye; Nicholas C Bambakidis; Kyra Becker; José Biller; Michael Brown; Bart M Demaerschalk; Brian Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Chelsea S Kidwell; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Bruce Ovbiagele; Phillip A Scott; Kevin N Sheth; Andrew M Southerland; Deborah V Summers; David L Tirschwell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  When and how to use antidotes for the reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH.

Authors:  J H Levy; W Ageno; N C Chan; M Crowther; P Verhamme; J I Weitz
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.824

7.  Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Robert P Giugliano; Christian T Ruff; Eugene Braunwald; Sabina A Murphy; Stephen D Wiviott; Jonathan L Halperin; Albert L Waldo; Michael D Ezekowitz; Jeffrey I Weitz; Jindřich Špinar; Witold Ruzyllo; Mikhail Ruda; Yukihiro Koretsune; Joshua Betcher; Minggao Shi; Laura T Grip; Shirali P Patel; Indravadan Patel; James J Hanyok; Michele Mercuri; Elliott M Antman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Evolving antithrombotic treatment patterns for patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  A John Camm; Gabriele Accetta; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Dan Atar; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Eivind Berge; Frank Cools; David A Fitzmaurice; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Shinya Goto; Sylvia Haas; Gloria Kayani; Yukihiro Koretsune; Lorenzo G Mantovani; Frank Misselwitz; Seil Oh; Alexander G G Turpie; Freek W A Verheugt; Ajay K Kakkar
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Point-of-care testing for emergency assessment of coagulation in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Matthias Ebner; Ingvild Birschmann; Andreas Peter; Charlotte Spencer; Florian Härtig; Joachim Kuhn; Gunnar Blumenstock; Christine S Zuern; Ulf Ziemann; Sven Poli
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Limitations of Specific Coagulation Tests for Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Critical Analysis.

Authors:  Matthias Ebner; Ingvild Birschmann; Andreas Peter; Florian Härtig; Charlotte Spencer; Joachim Kuhn; André Rupp; Gunnar Blumenstock; Christine S Zuern; Ulf Ziemann; Sven Poli
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intravenous thrombolysis in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (ESO IVT guidelines comment).

Authors:  David J Seiffge; Sven Poli; Thomas R Meinel; Teddy Wu; Duncan Wilson; Jan C Purrucker
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2021-10-20

Review 2.  Decision-Making Process for the Management of Acute Stroke in Patients on Oral Anticoagulant: From Guidelines to Clinical Routine.

Authors:  Igor Sibon; Mikael Mazighi; Didier Smadja
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.003

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.