Literature DB >> 33641214

Nationwide treatment and outcomes of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Anne-Marleen van Keulen1,2, Stijn Franssen1, Lydia G van der Geest3, Marieke T de Boer4, Minneke Coenraad5, Lydi M J W van Driel6, Joris I Erdmann7, Nadia Haj Mohammad8, Lara Heij9,10,11, Heinz-Josef Klümpen12, Eric Tjwa13, Liselot Valkenburg-van Iersel14, Joanne Verheij15, Bas Groot Koerkamp1, Pim B Olthof1,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a rare tumour that requires complex multidisciplinary management. All known data are almost exclusively derived from expert centres. This study aimed to analyse the outcomes of patients with pCCA in a nationwide cohort.
METHODS: Data on all patients diagnosed with pCCA in the Netherlands between 2010 and 2018 were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Data included type of hospital of diagnosis and the received treatment. Outcomes included the type of treatment and overall survival.
RESULTS: A total of 2031 patients were included and the median overall survival for the overall cohort was 5.2 (95% CI 4.7-5.7) months. Three-hundred-ten (15%) patients underwent surgical resection, 271 (13%) underwent palliative systemic treatment, 21 (1%) palliative local anti-cancer treatment and 1429 (70%) underwent best supportive care. These treatments resulted in a median overall survival of 29.6 (95% CI 25.2-34.0), 12.2 (95% CI 11.0-13.3), 14.5 (95%CI 8.2-20.8) and 2.9 (95% CI 2.6-3.2) months respectively. Resection rate was 13% in patients who were diagnosed in non-academic and 32% in academic centres (P < .001), which resulted in a survival difference in favour of academic centres. Median overall survival was 9.7 (95% CI 7.7-11.7) months in academic centres compared to 4.9 (95% CI 4.3-5.4) months in non-academic centres (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pCCA, resection rate and overall survival were higher for patients who were diagnosed in academic centres. These results show population-based outcomes of pCCA and highlight the importance of regional collaboration in the treatment of these patients.
© 2021 The Authors. Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cholangiocarcinoma; klatskin tumour; treatment outcome

Year:  2021        PMID: 33641214     DOI: 10.1111/liv.14856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Int        ISSN: 1478-3223            Impact factor:   5.828


  4 in total

1.  Editorial on "Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma-Novel Benchmark Values for Surgical and Oncological Outcomes From 24 Expert Centers".

Authors:  Shivan Sivakumar; Flavio G Rocha; Lara Heij
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 8.265

2.  CT-Based Radiomics Analysis for Noninvasive Prediction of Perineural Invasion of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Peng-Chao Zhan; Pei-Jie Lyu; Zhen Li; Xing Liu; Hui-Xia Wang; Na-Na Liu; Yuyuan Zhang; Wenpeng Huang; Yan Chen; Jian-Bo Gao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 3.  Current Perspectives on the Surgical Management of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  D Brock Hewitt; Zachary J Brown; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Comparison of Intraductal RFA Plus Stent versus Stent-Only Treatment for Unresectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  David M de Jong; Jeska A Fritzsche; Amber S Audhoe; Suzanne S L Yi; Marco J Bruno; Rogier P Voermans; Lydi M J W van Driel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.