Literature DB >> 33641024

Liquid Biopsy in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Ready for Prime Time?

David Gómez-Peregrina1, Alfonso García-Valverde1, Daniel Pilco-Janeta1, César Serrano2,3.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) constitutes a paradigm for clinically effective targeted inhibition of oncogenic driver mutations. Therefore, GIST has emerged as a compelling clinical and biological model to study oncogene addiction and to validate preclinical concepts for drug response and drug resistance. Oncogenic activation of KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases is the essential drivers of GIST progression throughout all stages of the disease. Interestingly, KIT/PDGFRA genotype predicts the response to first-line imatinib and to all tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) approved or in investigation after imatinib failure. Considering that TKIs are effective only against a subset of KIT or PDGFRA resistance mutations, close monitoring of tumor dynamics with non-invasive methods such as liquid biopsy emerges as a necessary step forward in the field. Liquid biopsy, in contrast to solid tumor biopsy, aims to characterize tumors irrespective of heterogeneity. Although there are several components in the peripheral blood, most recent studies have been focused on circulating tumor (ct)DNA, due to the technological feasibility, the stability of DNA itself and DNA alterations, and the therapeutic development in precision oncology largely based on the identification of genetic driver mutations. In the present review, we systematically dissect the current wealth of data of ctDNA in GIST. To do so, a critical understanding of the promises and limitations of the current technologies will be followed by an exposition of the knowledge gathered with such studies in GIST. Collectively, our goal is to establish clear premises that can be used as the foundations to build future studies towards the clinical implementation of ctDNA evaluation in GIST patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GIST; Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; Liquid biopsy; Precision oncology; Sarcoma; ctDNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33641024     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00832-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  50 in total

1.  Incidence of gastrointestinal stromal tumours is underestimated: results of a nation-wide study.

Authors:  Wim G Goettsch; Steffan D Bos; Nancy Breekveldt-Postma; Mariel Casparie; Ron M C Herings; Pancras C W Hogendoorn
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 2.  Precision Oncology: Who, How, What, When, and When Not?

Authors:  Lee Schwartzberg; Edward S Kim; David Liu; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2017

Review 3.  Current and future perspectives of liquid biopsies in genomics-driven oncology.

Authors:  Ellen Heitzer; Imran S Haque; Charles E S Roberts; Michael R Speicher
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists.

Authors:  Marilyn M Li; Michael Datto; Eric J Duncavage; Shashikant Kulkarni; Neal I Lindeman; Somak Roy; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Cindy L Vnencak-Jones; Daynna J Wolff; Anas Younes; Marina N Nikiforova
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Cancer: A precision approach to tumour treatment.

Authors:  Rodrigo Dienstmann; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach.

Authors:  Christopher D M Fletcher; Jules J Berman; Christopher Corless; Fred Gorstein; Jerzy Lasota; B Jack Longley; Markku Miettinen; Timothy J O'Leary; Helen Remotti; Brian P Rubin; Barry Shmookler; Leslie H Sobin; Sharon W Weiss
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  The National Lung Matrix Trial of personalized therapy in lung cancer.

Authors:  Gary Middleton; Peter Fletcher; Sanjay Popat; Joshua Savage; Yvonne Summers; Alastair Greystoke; David Gilligan; Judith Cave; Noelle O'Rourke; Alison Brewster; Elizabeth Toy; James Spicer; Pooja Jain; Adam Dangoor; Melanie Mackean; Martin Forster; Amanda Farley; Dee Wherton; Manita Mehmi; Rowena Sharpe; Tara C Mills; Maria Antonietta Cerone; Timothy A Yap; Thomas B K Watkins; Emilia Lim; Charles Swanton; Lucinda Billingham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Incidence of sarcoma histotypes and molecular subtypes in a prospective epidemiological study with central pathology review and molecular testing.

Authors:  Françoise Ducimetière; Antoine Lurkin; Dominique Ranchère-Vince; Anne-Valérie Decouvelaere; Michel Péoc'h; Luc Istier; Philippe Chalabreysse; Christine Muller; Laurent Alberti; Pierre-Paul Bringuier; Jean-Yves Scoazec; Anne-Marie Schott; Christophe Bergeron; Dominic Cellier; Jean-Yves Blay; Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study.

Authors:  Jason K Sicklick; Shumei Kato; Ryosuke Okamura; Maria Schwaederle; Michael E Hahn; Casey B Williams; Pradip De; Amy Krie; David E Piccioni; Vincent A Miller; Jeffrey S Ross; Adam Benson; Jennifer Webster; Philip J Stephens; J Jack Lee; Paul T Fanta; Scott M Lippman; Brian Leyland-Jones; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Early and Next-Generation KIT/PDGFRA Kinase Inhibitors and the Future of Treatment for Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

Authors:  Sebastian Bauer; Suzanne George; Margaret von Mehren; Michael C Heinrich
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.