Literature DB >> 33640931

Anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy: research priorities from an international Delphi consensus study.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) is an international collaborative group set up to study anastomotic leak outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer. This Delphi study aimed to prioritize future research areas of unmet clinical need in RCTs to reduce anastomotic leaks.
METHODS: A modified Delphi process was overseen by the OGAA committee, national leads, and engaged clinicians from high-income countries (HICs) and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). A three-stage iterative process was used to prioritize research topics, including a scoping systematic review (stage 1), and two rounds of anonymous electronic voting (stages 2 and 3) addressing research priority and ability to recruit. Stratified analyses were performed by country income.
RESULTS: In stage 1, the steering committee proposed research topics across six domains: preoperative optimization, surgical oncology, technical approach, anastomotic technique, enhanced recovery and nutrition, and management of leaks. In stages 2 and stage 3, 192 and 171 respondents respectively participated in online voting. Prioritized research topics include prehabilitation, anastomotic technique, and timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. Stratified analyses by country income demonstrated no significant differences in research priorities between HICs and LMICs. However, for ability to recruit, there were significant differences between LMICs and HICs for themes related to the technical approach (minimally invasive, width of gastric tube, ischaemic preconditioning) and location of the anastomosis.
CONCLUSION: Several areas of research priority are consistent across LMICs and HICs, but discrepancies in ability to recruit by country income will inform future study design.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33640931     DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  3 in total

Review 1.  Using Social Media to Engage Knowledge Users in Health Research Priority Setting: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Surabhi Sivaratnam; Kyobin Hwang; Alyssandra Chee-A-Tow; Lily Ren; Geoffrey Fang; Lindsay Jibb
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 7.076

2.  Circular vs. linear stapling after minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy: a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Alida Finze; Johanna Betzler; Svetlana Hetjens; Christoph Reissfelder; Mirko Otto; Susanne Blank
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Risk Factors, Diagnosis and Management of Chyle Leak Following Esophagectomy for Cancers: An International Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Sivesh K Kamarajah; Manjunath Siddaiah-Subramanya; Alessandro Parente; Richard P T Evans; Ademola Adeyeye; Alan Ainsworth; Alberto M L Takahashi; Alex Charalabopoulos; Andrew Chang; Atila Eroglue; Bas Wijnhoven; Claire Donohoe; Daniela Molena; Eider Talavera-Urquijo; Flavio Roberto Takeda; Gail Darling; German Rosero; Guillaume Piessen; Hans Mahendran; Hsu Po Kuei; Ines Gockel; Ionut Negoi; Jacopo Weindelmayer; Jari Rasanen; Kebebe Bekele; Guowei Kim; Lieven Depypere; Lorenzo Ferri; Magnus Nilsson; Frederik Klevebro; B Mark Smithers; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Peter Grimminger; Paul M Schneider; C S Pramesh; Raza Sayyed; Richard Babor; Shinji Mine; Simon Law; Suzanne Gisbertz; Tim Bright; Xavier Benoit D'Journo; Donald Low; Pritam Singh; Ewen A Griffiths
Journal:  Ann Surg Open       Date:  2022-08-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.