Levio Quinto1, Paula Sanchez-Somonte1, Francisco Alarcón2, Paz Garre1, Àngel Castillo1, Rodolfo San Antonio2, Roger Borras1, Eduard Guasch2, Elena Arbelo2, José Maria Tolosana2, Antonio Berruezo1, Lluís Mont1, Ivo Roca-Luque3. 1. Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Clinical Institute, Arrhythmia Unit, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. 2. Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Clinical Institute, Arrhythmia Unit, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain. 3. Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Clinical Institute, Arrhythmia Unit, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: iroca@clinic.cat.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Substrate-based ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation is a first-line treatment in patients with structural cardiac disease and sustained VT refractory to medical therapy. Despite technological improvements and increased knowledge of VT substrate, recurrence still is frequent. Published data are lacking on the possible reduction in VT burden after ablation despite recurrence. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess VT burden reduction during long-term follow-up after substrate ablation and identify predictors of VT recurrence. METHODS: We analyzed 234 consecutive VT ablation procedures in 207 patients (age 63 ± 14.9 years; 92% male; ischemic heart disease in 65%) who underwent substrate ablation in a single center from 2013 to 2018. RESULTS: After follow-up of 3.14 ± 1.8 years, the VT recurrence rate was 41.4%. Overall, a 99.6% reduction in VT burden (median VT episodes per year: preprocedural 3.546 [1.347-13.951] vs postprocedural 0.001 [0-0.689]; P = .001) and a 96.3% decrease in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks (preprocedural 1.145 [0.118-4.467] vs postprocedural 0.042 [0-0.111] per year; P = .017) were observed. In the subgroup of patients who experienced VT recurrences, VT burden decreased by 69.2% (median VT episodes per year: preprocedural 2.876 [1.105-8.801] vs postprocedural 0.882 [0.505-2.283]; P <.001). Multivariable analysis showed persistence of late potentials (67% vs 19%; hazard ratio 3.18 [2.18-6.65]; P <.001) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (30 [25-40] vs 39 [30-50]; P = .022) as predictors of VT recurrence. CONCLUSION: Despite a high recurrence rate during long-term follow-up, substrate-based VT ablation is related to a large reduction in VT burden and a decrease in ICD therapies. Lower EF and persistence of late potentials are predictors of recurrence.
BACKGROUND: Substrate-based ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation is a first-line treatment in patients with structural cardiac disease and sustained VT refractory to medical therapy. Despite technological improvements and increased knowledge of VT substrate, recurrence still is frequent. Published data are lacking on the possible reduction in VT burden after ablation despite recurrence. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess VT burden reduction during long-term follow-up after substrate ablation and identify predictors of VT recurrence. METHODS: We analyzed 234 consecutive VT ablation procedures in 207 patients (age 63 ± 14.9 years; 92% male; ischemic heart disease in 65%) who underwent substrate ablation in a single center from 2013 to 2018. RESULTS: After follow-up of 3.14 ± 1.8 years, the VT recurrence rate was 41.4%. Overall, a 99.6% reduction in VT burden (median VT episodes per year: preprocedural 3.546 [1.347-13.951] vs postprocedural 0.001 [0-0.689]; P = .001) and a 96.3% decrease in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks (preprocedural 1.145 [0.118-4.467] vs postprocedural 0.042 [0-0.111] per year; P = .017) were observed. In the subgroup of patients who experienced VT recurrences, VT burden decreased by 69.2% (median VT episodes per year: preprocedural 2.876 [1.105-8.801] vs postprocedural 0.882 [0.505-2.283]; P <.001). Multivariable analysis showed persistence of late potentials (67% vs 19%; hazard ratio 3.18 [2.18-6.65]; P <.001) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (30 [25-40] vs 39 [30-50]; P = .022) as predictors of VT recurrence. CONCLUSION: Despite a high recurrence rate during long-term follow-up, substrate-based VT ablation is related to a large reduction in VT burden and a decrease in ICD therapies. Lower EF and persistence of late potentials are predictors of recurrence.
Authors: Sara Vázquez-Calvo; Paz Garre; Paula Sanchez-Somonte; Roger Borras; Levio Quinto; Gala Caixal; Margarida Pujol-Lopez; Till Althoff; Eduard Guasch; Elena Arbelo; José Maria Tolosana; Josep Brugada; Lluís Mont; Ivo Roca-Luque Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-08-01