Literature DB >> 33638123

Reframing the Australian Medico-Legal Model of Infertility.

Anita Stuhmcke1.   

Abstract

Australian law affirms a binary construction of fertility/infertility. This model is based upon the medical categorization of infertility as a disease. Law supports medicine in prioritizing technology, such as in vitro fertilization, as treatment for infertility. This prioritization of a medico-legal model of infertility in turn marginalizes alternative means of family creation such as adoption, fostering, traditional surrogacy, and childlessness. This paper argues that this binary model masks the impact of medicalization upon reproductive choice and limits opportunity for infertile individuals to create families. While medical technology should be available to enhance reproductive opportunity, infertile individuals will benefit from regulatory change which disentangles the medico-legal construct of infertility as a disease from the desire to create a family. This paper suggests that the medico-legal model of infertility should be reframed to support all opportunities for family creation equally, including non-medical opportunities such as adoption, fostering, and childlessness.
© 2021. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology; Bioethics; Family; Infertility; Law; Medicalization

Year:  2021        PMID: 33638123     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-021-10094-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  23 in total

Review 1.  Infertility: from a personal to a public health problem.

Authors:  A T Fidler; J Bernstein
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 2.  The social construction of illness: key insights and policy implications.

Authors:  Peter Conrad; Kristin K Barker
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2010

3.  Patient autonomy and consent to treatment: the role of the law?

Authors:  M Brazier
Journal:  Leg Stud       Date:  1987-07

Review 4.  Legal embodiment: analysing the body of healthcare law.

Authors:  Ruth Fletcher; Marie Fox; Julie McCandless
Journal:  Med Law Rev       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  Editorial: Reflections on Bioethics and Law: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.

Authors:  Margaret Brazier; Sarah Devaney; Alexandra Mullock
Journal:  Med Law Rev       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 1.267

6.  Essentialism, which essentialism? Some implications of reproductive and genetic techno-science.

Authors:  S Franklin
Journal:  J Homosex       Date:  1993

7.  Racial Disparities in Seeking Care for Help Getting Pregnant.

Authors:  Helen B Chin; Penelope P Howards; Michael R Kramer; Ann C Mertens; Jessica B Spencer
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 8.  IVF and embryo transfer: historical origin and development.

Authors:  John D Biggers
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  Development of a health promotion programme to improve awareness of factors that affect fertility, and evaluation of its reach in the first 5 years.

Authors:  Karin Hammarberg; Robert J Norman; Sarah Robertson; Robert McLachlan; Janet Michelmore; Louise Johnson
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2017-07-08

10.  The Emergence and Development of Bioethics in the Uk.

Authors:  Ruth Chadwick; Duncan Wilson
Journal:  Med Law Rev       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 1.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.