Literature DB >> 33637651

Controls on the size distributions of shallow landslides.

Dino G Bellugi1, David G Milledge2, Kurt M Cuffey3,4, William E Dietrich1,4, Laurel G Larsen3.   

Abstract

Rainfall-triggered shallow landslides are destructive hazards and play an important role in landscape processes. A theory explaining the size distributions of such features remains elusive. Prior work connects size distributions to topography, but field-mapped inventories reveal pronounced similarities in the form, mode, and spread of distributions from diverse landscapes. We analyze nearly identical distributions occurring in the Oregon Coast Range and the English Lake District, two regions of strikingly different topography, lithology, and vegetation. Similarity in minimum sizes at these sites is partly explained by theory that accounts for the interplay of mechanical soil strength controls resisting failure. Maximum sizes, however, are not explained by current theory. We develop a generalized framework to account for the entire size distribution by unifying a mechanistic slope stability model with a flexible spatial-statistical description for the variability of hillslope strength. Using hillslope-scale numerical experiments, we find that landslides can occur not only in individual low strength areas but also across multiple smaller patches that coalesce. We show that reproducing observed size distributions requires spatial strength variations to be strongly localized, of large amplitude, and a consequence of multiple interacting factors. Such constraints can act together with the mechanical determinants of landslide initiation to produce size distributions of broadly similar character in widely different landscapes, as found in our examples. We propose that size distributions reflect the systematic scale dependence of the spatially averaged strength. Our results highlight the critical need to constrain the form, amplitude, and wavelength of spatial variability in material strength properties of hillslopes.

Keywords:  landslide; landslide size; size distributions; spatial variability

Year:  2021        PMID: 33637651      PMCID: PMC7936322          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2021855118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  Basins of attraction on random topography.

Authors:  N Schorghofer; D H Rothman
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2001-01-24

2.  Root systems of chaparral shrubs.

Authors:  Jochen Kummerow; David Krause; William Jow
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  A multidimensional stability model for predicting shallow landslide size and shape across landscapes.

Authors:  David G Milledge; Dino Bellugi; Jim A McKean; Alexander L Densmore; William E Dietrich
Journal:  J Geophys Res Earth Surf       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.041

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Inversions of landslide strength as a proxy for subsurface weathering.

Authors:  Stefano Alberti; Ben Leshchinsky; Josh Roering; Jonathan Perkins; Michael J Olsen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 17.694

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.