Literature DB >> 33637061

Group versus individual treatment for substance use disorders: a study protocol for the COMDAT trial.

Sidsel Helena Karsberg1, Mads Uffe Pedersen2, Morten Hesse2, Birgitte Thylstrup2, Michael Mulbjerg Pedersen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alcohol and other drug use disorders contribute substantially to the global burden of illness. The majority of people with substance use disorders do not receive any treatment for their problems, and developing treatments that are attractive and effective to patients should be a priority. However, whether treatment is best delivered in a group format or an individual format has only been studied to a very limited degree. The COMDAT (Combined Drug and Alcohol Treatment) trial evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and cost effectiveness of MOVE group (MOVE-G) treatment versus MOVE individual (MOVE-I) treatment in four community-based outpatient treatment centres in Denmark.
METHODS: A two-arm non-inferiority trial comparing MOVE-I (Pedersen et al., Drug Alcohol Depend 218:108363, 2020) with MOVE-G a combined group treatment for both alcohol use disorder and drug use disorder. The primary objective is to examine whether MOVE-G is non-inferior to MOVE-I in relation to abstinence from drug and/or alcohol, number of sessions received, and completion of treatment as planned. All participants will receive treatment based on cognitive behavioral therapy and motivational interviewing, vouchers for attendance and text reminders, as well as medication as needed (MOVE). Participants (n = 300) will be recruited over a one-year period at four public treatment centers in four Danish municipalities. A short screening will determine eligibility and randomization status. Hereafter, participants will be randomized to the two treatment arms. A thorough baseline assessment will be conducted approximately 1 week after randomization. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at 9 months post-randomization. In addition, patients' use of drugs and alcohol, and patients' wellbeing will be measured in all sessions. The main outcome measures are drug and alcohol intake at 9 months follow-up, number of sessions attended, and dropout from treatment. DISCUSSION: The present study will examine the potential and efficacy of combined groups (patients with alcohol and drug disorders in the same group) versus individually based treatment both based on the treatment method MOVE (Pedersen et al., Drug Alcohol Depend 218:108363, 2020). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN88025085 , registration date 30/06/2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community based treatment; Contingency management; Group-based treatment; Individual treatment; Randomized controlled trial; Substance use disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33637061      PMCID: PMC7913269          DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10271-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  27 in total

1.  Brief treatments for cannabis dependence: findings from a randomized multisite trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2004-06

Review 2.  Co-occurring mental and substance abuse disorders: a review on the potential predictors and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Pablo Najt; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Paolo Brambilla
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 3.  Group therapy for substance use disorders: what do we know?

Authors:  Roger D Weiss; William B Jaffee; Victoria P de Menil; Catherine B Cogley
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  The impact of client treatment preferences on outcome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua K Swift; Jennifer L Callahan
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-04

5.  Closed-Loop Insulin for Glycemic Control in Noncritical Care.

Authors:  Lia Bally; Hood Thabit; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Attitudes Towards (Psychotherapy) Groups: Results of a Survey in a Representative Sample.

Authors:  Bernhard Strauss; Lena Spangenberg; Elmar Brähler; Bianca Bormann
Journal:  Int J Group Psychother       Date:  2014-06-25

Review 7.  Alcohol use disorders.

Authors:  Andre F Carvalho; Markus Heilig; Augusto Perez; Charlotte Probst; Jürgen Rehm
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A randomized controlled trial for aggression and substance use involvement among Veterans: Impact of combining Motivational Interviewing, Cognitive Behavioral Treatment and telephone-based Continuing Care.

Authors:  Stephen T Chermack; Erin E Bonar; Jason E Goldstick; Jamie Winters; Frederic C Blow; Steven Friday; Mark A Ilgen; Sheila A M Rauch; Brian E Perron; Quyen M Ngo; Maureen A Walton
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2019-01-04

Review 9.  A review of the literature on contingency management in the treatment of substance use disorders, 2009-2014.

Authors:  Danielle R Davis; Allison N Kurti; Joan M Skelly; Ryan Redner; Thomas J White; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Effect of Group vs Individual Cognitive Processing Therapy in Active-Duty Military Seeking Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Patricia A Resick; Jennifer Schuster Wachen; Katherine A Dondanville; Kristi E Pruiksma; Jeffrey S Yarvis; Alan L Peterson; Jim Mintz; Elisa V Borah; Antoinette Brundige; Elizabeth A Hembree; Brett T Litz; John D Roache; Stacey Young-McCaughan
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 21.596

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.