Literature DB >> 33636125

The changing face of medical professionalism and the impact of COVID-19.

Andrew F Goddard1, Mumtaz Patel2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33636125      PMCID: PMC7906722          DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00436-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


× No keyword cloud information.
Medical professionalism is changing with the increasing gap between what doctors have traditionally been trained to do and the realities of modern clinical practice. In high-income countries, the changing demographics of patients with an ageing population, the large proportion of patients with long-term conditions and multiple comorbidities, and rising health-care costs have placed huge pressures on health systems globally. Advances in technology and science have changed the way health professionals interact with patients, and democratisation of knowledge and increased accountability that come with changing patient and societal expectations have added to the demands placed on physicians. In many countries, inadequate staffing levels aggravate this situation. Morale among doctors is generally declining—eg, a survey in the UK showed 54% of physicians reported morale as low or very low—and burnout is rising (prevalence about 66–80%).5, 6 There is a crisis in staff retention in some countries with up to 48% doctors considering leaving the profession. COVID-19 has exacerbated these tensions between medical professionalism and physician wellbeing. The pandemic has placed substantial demands on already overstretched, understaffed, and under-resourced health systems. COVID-19 has tested doctors and health-care workers to the limits of their professional competence and taken a considerable toll on their health and wellbeing. Core principles of medical professionalism—ie, primacy of patient welfare, patient autonomy, and social justice—have been challenged during the pandemic. Many doctors worldwide have had to change the way they work, having to prioritise patient care and make difficult decisions based on insufficient resources, including withholding and withdrawing potentially life-saving treatments.10, 11 Doctors have had to balance their personal risk with their duty to care for patients as well as balance professional versus caring responsibilities for household members in high-risk groups. The need to self-isolate if they or their family members have symptoms of COVID-19 take them away from front-line responsibilities. All these factors have caused a sense of guilt, tension, and moral injury. Moral injury in this context occurs when doctors are forced to make decisions that contradict their professional and moral commitments—the challenge of knowing what care patients need but being unable to provide it due to constraints beyond their control. The moral injury concept helps reframe such challenges from a focus on the individual to a system-wide perspective. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed how health professionals work, how we behave and interact within our teams and organisations, our understandings of personal health and risk, inequalities between doctors with different risk factors, and wellbeing and mental health. Globally more than 300 000 health-care workers have been infected with COVID-19 in 79 countries, over 7000 have died, and many more have suffered as a result of stress, burnout, and moral injury.13, 15 There is an urgent need for a system-level approach to address the issues that COVID-19 has created to better protect and safeguard our medical workforce for the future. Such approaches need to focus on organisational culture and staff wellbeing as integral to professionalism and central to patient care. Physicians' wellbeing must be recognised as a care quality indicator for all health systems. Improving the working lives of clinicians can optimise the performance of health systems, improve patient experience, drive population health, and reduce costs.16, 18 Targeted interventions are likely to be less effective if only aimed at the individual. During COVID-19, there have been many wellbeing initiatives for clinicians that have been well received. However, they need to be combined with organisational interventions including flexible working arrangements, enhanced teamwork, reductions in administrative burdens, and optimal use of technology. Health professionals need to be well supported throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. The medical profession, health systems, and society all have a part to play in ensuring this support is provided. Individual doctors need to be empowered to recognise their own limitations as well as their wellbeing and support needs. The professions must adapt to the changing needs of modern clinical practice and shape how we balance the many competing demands on us. Health professionals must build on the changes that are good for patient care and resist those that are not. COVID-19 has shown that we must move away from a model of medical professionalism that can lead to moral injury and towards one that provides proactive support for professionals in a systematic way and is focused on supporting moral repair. With the second and subsequent waves of COVID-19 now well established in many countries, we need to ensure that we as a profession support our doctors and promote ways of working that incorporate the doctor, the patient, teams, health-care organisations, workplace environment, and health systems. Over time, this wider system approach will lead to greater cohesiveness within health care and support individual professionals in a safer, more sustainable way.
  7 in total

1.  Global primary care as an incubator for good ethical practice.

Authors:  Andrew Papanikitas; Tania Moerenhout; Ross Upshur
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.302

2.  The Effect of the Electronic Health Record on Interprofessional Practice: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Samantha T Robertson; Ingrid C M Rosbergen; Andrew Burton-Jones; Rohan S Grimley; Sandra G Brauer
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.762

3.  Psychological distress among outpatient physicians in private practice linked to COVID-19 and related mental health during the second lockdown.

Authors:  Ariel Frajerman; Romain Colle; Franz Hozer; Eric Deflesselle; Samuel Rotenberg; Kenneth Chappell; Emmanuelle Corruble; Jean-François Costemale-Lacoste
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Characterising Kenyan hospitals' suitability for medical officer internship training: a secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yingxi Zhao; Boniface Osano; Fred Were; Helen Kiarie; Catia Nicodemo; David Gathara; Mike English
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care workers: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Enric Aragonès; Isabel Del Cura-González; Lucía Hernández-Rivas; Elena Polentinos-Castro; Maria Isabel Fernández-San-Martín; Juan A López-Rodríguez; Josep M Molina-Aragonés; Franco Amigo; Itxaso Alayo; Philippe Mortier; Montse Ferrer; Víctor Pérez-Solà; Gemma Vilagut; Jordi Alonso
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.302

Review 6.  Innovations in Cardio-oncology Resulting from the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Lavanya Kondapalli; Garima Arora; Riem Hawi; Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Courtney Estes; Nirav Patel; Carrie G Lenneman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-08-15

7.  The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Spectrum of Performed Dental Procedures.

Authors:  Kacper Nijakowski; Kornela Cieślik; Kacper Łaganowski; Dawid Gruszczyński; Anna Surdacka
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.