Literature DB >> 33635903

Psychophysiological responses to manual lifting of unknown loads.

Tamer M Khalaf1,2, Mohamed Z Ramadan1, Adham E Ragab1, Mohammed H Alhaag1, Khalil A AlSharabi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The handling of unknown weights, which is common in daily routines either at work or during leisure time, is suspected to be highly associated with the incidence of low back pain (LBP).
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of knowledge and magnitude of a load (to be lifted) on brain responses, autonomic nervous activity, and trapezius and erector spinae muscle activity.
METHODS: A randomized, within-subjects experiment involving manual lifting was conducted, wherein 10 participants lifted three different weights (1.1, 5, and 15 kg) under two conditions: either having or not having prior knowledge of the weight to be lifted.
RESULTS: The results revealed that the lifting of unknown weights caused increased average heart rate and percentage of maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC) but decreased average inter-beat interval, very-low-frequency power, low-frequency power, and low-frequency/high-frequency ratio. Regardless of the weight magnitude, lifting of unknown weights was associated with smaller theta activities in the power spectrum density (PSD) of the central region, smaller alpha activities in the PSD of the frontal region, and smaller beta activities in the PSDs of both the frontal and central regions. Moreover, smaller alpha and beta activities in the PSD of the parietal region were associated only with lifting of unknown lightweights.
CONCLUSIONS: Uncertainty regarding the weight to be lifted could be considered as a stress-adding variable that may increase the required physical demand to be sustained during manual lifting tasks. The findings of this study stress the importance of eliminating uncertainty associated with handling unknown weights, such as in the cases of handling patients and dispatching luggage. This can be achieved through preliminary self-sensing of the load to be lifted, or the cautious disclosure of the actual weight of manually lifted objects, for example, through clear labeling and/or a coding system.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33635903      PMCID: PMC7909684          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  36 in total

1.  Neurophysiological and behavioral indices of time pressure effects on visuomotor task performance.

Authors:  S M Slobounov; K Fukada; R Simon; M Rearick; W Ray
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2000-06

2.  Lifting an unexpectedly heavy object: the effects on low-back loading and balance loss.

Authors:  J C van der Burg; J H van Dieën; H M Toussaint
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Scaling of lifting forces in relation to object size in whole body lifting.

Authors:  Idsart Kingma; Jaap H Van Dieën; Huub M Toussaint
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Relationship between regional hemodynamic activity and simultaneously recorded EEG-theta associated with mental arithmetic-induced workload.

Authors:  Gebhard Sammer; Carlo Blecker; Helge Gebhardt; Matthias Bischoff; Rudolf Stark; Katrin Morgen; Dieter Vaitl
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Weight knowledge and weight magnitude: impact on lumbosacral loading.

Authors:  Ahmed T Farrag; Walaa H Elsayed; Mohsen M El-Sayyad; William S Marras
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Trunk loading and expectation.

Authors:  W S Marras; S L Rangarajulu; S A Lavender
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  The influence of load knowledge on lifting technique.

Authors:  D Butler; G B Andersson; J Trafimow; O D Schipplein; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 8.  Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Trunk muscle activation and low back loading in lifting in the absence of load knowledge.

Authors:  M P de Looze; M C Boeken-Kruger; S Steenhuizen; C T Baten; I Kingma; J H van Dieën
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Impact of order and load knowledge on trunk kinematics during repeated lifting tasks.

Authors:  Susan E Kotowski; Kermit G Davis; Kevin Shockley
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.888

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.