Literature DB >> 33635016

Comparison of Automated Brain Volume Measures by NeuroQuant vs. Freesurfer in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Effect of Slice Thickness.

Younghee Yim1,2, Ji Young Lee3, Se Won Oh4,5, Mi Sun Chung2, Ji Eun Park6, Yeonsil Moon7, Hong Jun Jeon8, Won Jin Moon9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the inter-method reliability and volumetric differences between NeuroQuant (NQ) and Freesurfer (FS) using T1 volume imaging sequence with different slice thicknesses in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 80 patients diagnosed with MCI at our memory clinic. NQ and FS were used for volumetric analysis of three-dimensional T1-weighted images with slice thickness of 1 and 1.2 mm. Inter-method reliability was measured with Pearson correlation coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and effect size (ES).
RESULTS: Overall, NQ volumes were larger than FS volumes in several locations: whole brain (0.78%), cortical gray matter (5.34%), and white matter (2.68%). Volume measures by NQ and FS showed good-to-excellent ICCs with both 1 and 1.2 mm slice thickness (ICC=0.75-0.97, ES=-1.0-0.73 vs. ICC=0.78-0.96, ES=-0.9-0.77, respectively), except for putamen, pallidum, thalamus, and total intracranial volumes. The ICCs in all locations, except the putamen and cerebellum, were slightly higher with a slice thickness of 1 mm compared to those of 1.2 mm.
CONCLUSION: Inter-method reliability between NQ and FS was good-to-excellent in most regions with improvement with a 1-mm slice thickness. This finding indicates that the potential effects of slice thickness should be considered when performing volumetric measurements for cognitive impairment. © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain volume; FreeSurfer; NeuroQuant; mild cognitive impairment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33635016     DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.3.255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


  5 in total

Review 1.  Updated Review of the Evidence Supporting the Medical and Legal Use of NeuroQuant® and NeuroGage® in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  David E Ross; John Seabaugh; Jan M Seabaugh; Justis Barcelona; Daniel Seabaugh; Katherine Wright; Lee Norwind; Zachary King; Travis J Graham; Joseph Baker; Tanner Lewis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 2.  [Expert Opinions and Recommendations for the Clinical Use of Quantitative Analysis Software for MRI-Based Brain Volumetry].

Authors:  Ji Young Lee; Ji Eun Park; Mi Sun Chung; Se Won Oh; Won-Jin Moon
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-07-14

3.  Agreement and Reliability between Clinically Available Software Programs in Measuring Volumes and Normative Percentiles of Segmented Brain Regions.

Authors:  Huijin Song; Seun Ah Lee; Sang Won Jo; Suk-Ki Chang; Yunji Lim; Yeong Seo Yoo; Jae Ho Kim; Seung Hong Choi; Chul-Ho Sohn
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 7.109

4.  Association Between Visceral Fat and Brain Cortical Thickness in the Elderly: A Neuroimaging Study.

Authors:  Jaelim Cho; Seongho Seo; Woo-Ram Kim; Changsoo Kim; Young Noh
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 5.  Technical and clinical validation of commercial automated volumetric MRI tools for dementia diagnosis-a systematic review.

Authors:  Hugh G Pemberton; Lara A M Zaki; Olivia Goodkin; Ravi K Das; Rebecca M E Steketee; Frederik Barkhof; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.804

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.