Literature DB >> 33634326

Pitfalls in PSMA imaging: [18F]rhPSMA-7-PET/CT reveals presence of chrondrosarcoma.

B Feuerecker1,2,3, C Mogler4, K Wörtler5, C Knebel6, M Eiber7, M Krönke5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33634326      PMCID: PMC8263403          DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05254-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


× No keyword cloud information.
PET imaging targeting the prostate membrane-specific antigen (PSMA) has demonstrated high potential in localizing disease in prostate cancer. In addition to prostate cancer, both benign and malignant lesions have been reported to highly express PSMA (e.g. ganglia, parathyroid adenoma, lung, thyroid, and renal cancers [1-3]). Here, we describe the case of a 71-year-old male patient who was referred for imaging of biochemical recurrent prostate cancer (Gleason Score 7b, iPSA 116 ng/ml, s/p radical prostatectomy, PSA at imaging 0.32 ng/ml). [18F]rhPSMA-7-PET/CT showed high PSMA-ligand uptake in an expansile lytic bone lesion of the sternum, a small local recurrence and a bone lesion. The lesion of the sternum showed a lobular appearance, a shell-like periosteal reaction, and matrix calcifications (A PET MIP, B fused PET/CT, C PET only, D axial CT only, E sagittal CT only showing a sharply demarcated lesion, red arrows indicate the lesion, green arrow indicates a bone lesion, pink a local recurrence) and exhibited high T2-weighted signal intensity (F) and septonodular contrast enhancement (G) on magnetic resonance imaging. Given this morphological appearance, metastasis seemed unlikely and the subsequent biopsy and surgery confirmed the diagnosis of a grade 3 chondrosarcoma. Immunohistochemistry showed that PSMA was mainly expressed in small intralesional blood vessels/capillaries (histological slices H, yellow arrow: PSMA-staining; blue arrow: hyaline matrix). This is in line with previous reports demonstrating high PSMA-expression in vascular regions [2, 4, 5]. In summary, this case illustrates the potential pitfalls in PSMA-ligand PET-imaging given that PSMA-expression is also present in non-prostate cancer lesions and highlights the necessity of thorough analysis of the accompanying cross-sectional imaging modality.
  5 in total

1.  First evidence of PSMA expression in differentiated thyroid cancer using [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT.

Authors:  Frederik A Verburg; Thomas Krohn; Alexander Heinzel; Felix M Mottaghy; Florian F Behrendt
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Pitfalls in Ga-68-PSMA-PET/CT: incidental finding of parathyroid adenoma.

Authors:  Christian H Pfob; Ilham Karimov; Moritz Jesinghaus; Alexander Novotny; Wolfgang A Weber; Matthias Eiber; Benedikt Feuerecker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Monoclonal antibodies to the extracellular domain of prostate-specific membrane antigen also react with tumor vascular endothelium.

Authors:  H Liu; P Moy; S Kim; Y Xia; A Rajasekaran; V Navarro; B Knudsen; N H Bander
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues.

Authors:  D A Silver; I Pellicer; W R Fair; W D Heston; C Cordon-Cardo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Pearls and pitfalls in clinical interpretation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging.

Authors:  Sara Sheikhbahaei; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Matthias Eiber; Lilja B Solnes; Mehrbod S Javadi; Ashley E Ross; Kenneth J Pienta; Mohamad E Allaf; Uwe Haberkorn; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 9.236

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.