Literature DB >> 33634174

Cinematic Rendering in Mixed-Reality Holograms: A New 3D Preoperative Planning Tool in Pediatric Heart Surgery.

Pia Gehrsitz1, Oliver Rompel2, Martin Schöber1, Robert Cesnjevar3, Ariawan Purbojo3, Michael Uder2, Sven Dittrich1, Muhannad Alkassar1.   

Abstract

Cinematic rendering (CR) is based on a new algorithm that creates a photo-realistic three-dimensional (3D) picture from cross-sectional images. Previous studies have shown its positive impact on preoperative planning. To date, CR presentation has only been possible on 2D screens which limited natural 3D perception. To depict CR-hearts spatially, we used mixed-reality technology and mapped corresponding hearts as holograms in 3D space. Our aim was to assess the benefits of CR-holograms in the preoperative planning of cardiac surgery. Including 3D prints allowed a direct comparison of two spatially resolved display methods. Twenty-six patients were recruited between February and September 2019. CT or MRI was used to visualize the patient's heart preoperatively. The surgeon was shown the anatomy in cross-sections on a 2D screen, followed by spatial representations as a 3D print and as a high-resolution hologram. The holographic representation was carried out using mixed-reality glasses (HoloLens®). To create the 3D prints, corresponding structures were segmented to create STL files which were printed out of resin. In 22 questions, divided in 5 categories (3D-imaging effect, representation of pathology, structure resolution, cost/benefit ratio, influence on surgery), the surgeons compared each spatial representation with the 2D method, using a five-level Likert scale. The surgical preparation time was assessed by comparing retrospectively matched patient pairs, using a paired t-test. CR-holograms surpassed 2D-monitor imaging in all categories. CR-holograms were superior to 3D prints in all categories (mean Likert scale 4.4 ± 1.0 vs. 3.7 ± 1.3, P < 0.05). Compared to 3D prints it especially improved the depth perception (4.7 ± 0.7 vs. 3.7 ± 1.2) and the representation of the pathology (4.4 ± 0.9 vs. 3.6 ± 1.2). 3D imaging reduced the intraoperative preparation time (n = 24, 59 ± 23 min vs. 73 ± 43 min, P < 0.05). In conclusion, the combination of an extremely photo-realistic presentation via cinematic rendering and the spatial presentation in 3D space via mixed-reality technology allows a previously unattained level of comprehension of anatomy and pathology in preoperative planning.
Copyright © 2021 Gehrsitz, Rompel, Schöber, Cesnjevar, Purbojo, Uder, Dittrich and Alkassar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; cinematic rendering; congenital heart disease; mixed-reality; pediatric heart surgery; preoperative planning

Year:  2021        PMID: 33634174      PMCID: PMC7900175          DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.633611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 2297-055X


  25 in total

1.  Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency.

Authors:  David L Streiner
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2003-02

2.  Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics.

Authors:  Geoff Norman
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.853

3.  Utility of three-dimensional models in resident education on simple and complex intracardiac congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Shelby C White; Jennifer Sedler; Trahern W Jones; Michael Seckeler
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  Three-dimensional printed models for surgical planning of complex congenital heart defects: an international multicentre study.

Authors:  Israel Valverde; Gorka Gomez-Ciriza; Tarique Hussain; Cristina Suarez-Mejias; Maria N Velasco-Forte; Nicholas Byrne; Antonio Ordoñez; Antonio Gonzalez-Calle; David Anderson; Mark G Hazekamp; Arno A W Roest; Jose Rivas-Gonzalez; Sergio Uribe; Issam El-Rassi; John Simpson; Owen Miller; Enrique Ruiz; Ignacio Zabala; Ana Mendez; Begoña Manso; Pastora Gallego; Freddy Prada; Massimiliano Cantinotti; Lamia Ait-Ali; Carlos Merino; Andrew Parry; Nancy Poirier; Gerald Greil; Reza Razavi; Tomas Gomez-Cia; Amir-Reza Hosseinpour
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Patient-specific three-dimensional printed heart models benefit preoperative planning for complex congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Jia-Jun Xu; Yu-Jia Luo; Jin-Hua Wang; Wei-Ze Xu; Zhuo Shi; Jian-Zhong Fu; Qiang Shu
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 2.764

6.  The role of 3D printing in preoperative planning for heart transplantation in complex congenital heart disease.

Authors:  M L Smith; J McGuinness; M K O'Reilly; L Nolke; J G Murray; J F X Jones
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Initial experience with cinematic rendering for the visualization of extracardiac anatomy in complex congenital heart defects†.

Authors:  Florian Röschl; Ariawan Purbojo; André Rüffer; Robert Cesnjevar; Sven Dittrich; Martin Glöckler
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-06-01

8.  3D-Printed Models for Surgical Planning in Complex Congenital Heart Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Clément Batteux; Moussa A Haidar; Damien Bonnet
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.418

9.  Comparison of Cinematic Rendering and Computed Tomography for Speed and Comprehension of Surgical Anatomy.

Authors:  Moustafa Elshafei; Johannes Binder; Justus Baecker; Maximilian Brunner; Michael Uder; Georg F Weber; Robert Grützmann; Christian Krautz
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 10.  Three-dimensional printing in congenital heart disease: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ivan Lau; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2018-02-17
View more
  2 in total

1.  Photorealistic three-dimensional visualization of fusion datasets: cinematic rendering of PET/CT.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Martin G Pomper; Jeffrey P Leal; Robert Schneider; Sebastian Krüger; Linda C Chu; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-08-02

2.  Advances and Innovations in Ablative Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery Using Mixed Reality Technologies in Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Nadia Karnatz; Henriette L Möllmann; Max Wilkat; Aida Parviz; Majeed Rana
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.