Literature DB >> 33633975

"Kimura-first" strategy for robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: experiences from 61 consecutive cases in a single institution.

Xianchao Lin1, Ronggui Lin1, Fengchun Lu1, Yuanyuan Yang1, Congfei Wang1, Haizong Fang1, Heguang Huang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (RSPDP) is an ideal procedure for benign and low-grade malignant tumors in the distal pancreas, and two splenic preservation techniques (the Kimura and Warshaw techniques) can be used for RSPDP. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the "Kimura-first" strategy for RSPDP and to investigate the risk factors affecting the preservation of the spleen and splenic vessels.
METHODS: The electronic medical records of patients who underwent robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) between October 2016 and December 2019 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the risk factors influencing preservation of the spleen and splenic vessels during RDP.
RESULTS: Sixty-one patients scheduled for RSPDP who received RDP were included in this study [Kimura technique, 41 patients; Warshaw technique, 11 patients; and robotic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (RDPS), 9 patients]. The overall splenic preservation rate with RDP was 85.2% (52/61). The preservation rate of splenic vessels with the Kimura technique with RSPDP was 78.8% (41/52). The RSPDP group had remarkably less estimated blood loss (EBL; median 50 vs. 300 mL, P=0.000) and a lower morbidity rate (13.5% vs. 44.4%, P=0.047) than the RDPS group. The logistic regression models showed that obvious splenic vessel compression by the tumor was an independent risk factor for splenic vessel preservation with RSPDP (OR 0.021, 95% CI: 0.002-0.271, P=0.003) and RDP (OR 0.019, 95% CI: 0.002-0.176, P=0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: The "Kimura-first" strategy is feasible and safe for RSPDP, with high rates of splenic and splenic vessel preservation. Obvious splenic vessel compression by the tumor can be used as a predictor of splenic vessel preservation with planned RDP. 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic; distal pancreatectomy; splenectomy; splenic preservation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33633975      PMCID: PMC7882308          DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  30 in total

1.  Splenic vein thrombosis and pancreatic fistula after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (Br J Surg 2014; 101: 114-119).

Authors:  P Addeo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein: techniques and its significance.

Authors:  Wataru Kimura; Mitsuhiro Yano; Shuichiro Sugawara; Shinji Okazaki; Tamie Sato; Toshiyuki Moriya; Toshihiro Watanabe; Hiroto Fujimoto; Koji Tezuka; Akiko Takeshita; Ichiro Hirai
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 7.027

3.  Short-term and long-term outcomes after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): a multicenter comparative study.

Authors:  Sergio Alfieri; Giovanni Butturini; Ugo Boggi; Andrea Pietrabissa; Luca Morelli; Fabio Vistoli; Isacco Damoli; Andrea Peri; Claudio Fiorillo; Luigi Pugliese; Marco Ramera; Nelide De Lio; Gregorio Di Franco; Alessandro Esposito; Luca Landoni; Fausto Rosa; Roberta Menghi; Giovanni Battista Doglietto; Giuseppe Quero
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left pancreatectomy at a high-volume, minimally invasive center.

Authors:  William B Lyman; Michael Passeri; Amit Sastry; Allyson Cochran; David A Iannitti; Dionisios Vrochides; Erin H Baker; John B Martinie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  A L Warshaw
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-05

6.  Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages?

Authors:  Chang Moo Kang; Dong Hyun Kim; Woo Jung Lee; Hoon Sang Chi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Risk Factors and Mitigation Strategies for Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy: Analysis of 2026 Resections From the International, Multi-institutional Distal Pancreatectomy Study Group.

Authors:  Brett L Ecker; Matthew T McMillan; Valentina Allegrini; Claudio Bassi; Joal D Beane; Ross M Beckman; Stephen W Behrman; Euan J Dickson; Mark P Callery; John D Christein; Jeffrey A Drebin; Robert H Hollis; Michael G House; Nigel B Jamieson; Ammar A Javed; Tara S Kent; Michael D Kluger; Stacy J Kowalsky; Laura Maggino; Giuseppe Malleo; Vicente Valero; Lavanniya K P Velu; Amarra A Watkins; Christopher L Wolfgang; Amer H Zureikat; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A blunt dissection technique using the LigaSure vessel-sealing device improves perioperative outcomes and postoperative splenic-vessel patency after laparoscopic spleen- and splenic-vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Sungho Kim; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Ho-Seong Han; Jai Young Cho; YoungRok Choi; In Gun Hyun; Kil Hwan Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  True learning curve of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation.

Authors:  Hyung Sun Kim; Joon Seong Park; Dong Sup Yoon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Splenic preservation versus splenectomy in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Alma L Moekotte; Sanne Lof; Steve A White; Ravi Marudanayagam; Bilal Al-Sarireh; Sakhanat Rahman; Zahir Soonawalla; Mark Deakin; Somaiah Aroori; Basil Ammori; Dhanny Gomez; Gabriele Marangoni; Mohammed Abu Hilal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.