Literature DB >> 33633962

Advance ligation to facilitate pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy by dilating the main pancreatic duct.

Masayuki Honda1,2,3, Masayoshi Hioki1, Hiroshi Sadamori1, Kazuteru Monden1, Go Wakabayashi3, Norihisa Takakura1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is technically challenging, particularly in cases of soft pancreas with a nondilated main pancreatic duct (MPD). We propose a novel procedure that involves ligating the pancreas in advance to allow for MPD dilation.
METHODS: We compared the data of 16 patients who underwent PD followed by PJ with advance ligation (AL) for soft pancreas with a nondilated MPD with that of 17 patients who underwent a conventional procedure (conventional group) without AL at a single institution between January 2015 and April 2017. MPD diameters were assessed using preoperative computed tomography and intraoperative ultrasonography. Pancreatic consistency was judged intraoperatively. The pancreatic parenchyma and MPD were ligated in advance to allow time for MPD dilation. After AL, we divided the pancreatic parenchyma. AL led to MPD dilation and facilitated PJ.
RESULTS: There were significantly fewer complications in the AL group than in the conventional group (P=0.005). There were no cases of pancreatitis or death in either group. The mean procedural time for occluding the MPD was 43 min (range, 21-134 min). The median MPD dilation rate after AL was 1.6 (0.9-3.8).
CONCLUSIONS: AL is a simple, safe, and useful procedure for facilitating PJ. 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreas; ligation; pancreatic duct; pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD); pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ)

Year:  2021        PMID: 33633962      PMCID: PMC7882339          DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  5 in total

Review 1.  The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Marchegiani; Christos Dervenis; Micheal Sarr; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Mustapha Adham; Peter Allen; Roland Andersson; Horacio J Asbun; Marc G Besselink; Kevin Conlon; Marco Del Chiaro; Massimo Falconi; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Abe Fingerhut; Helmut Friess; Dirk J Gouma; Thilo Hackert; Jakob Izbicki; Keith D Lillemoe; John P Neoptolemos; Attila Olah; Richard Schulick; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Tadahiro Takada; Kyoichi Takaori; William Traverso; Charles R Vollmer; Christopher L Wolfgang; Charles J Yeo; Roberto Salvia; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  A simpler and more reliable technique of pancreatojejunal anastomosis.

Authors:  A Kakita; T Takahashi; M Yoshida; K Furuta
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme.

Authors:  Wande B Pratt; Shishir K Maithel; Tsafrir Vanounou; Zhen S Huang; Mark P Callery; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A prospective randomized controlled trial of internal versus external drainage with pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Masaji Tani; Manabu Kawai; Seiko Hirono; Shinomi Ina; Motoki Miyazawa; Atsushi Shimizu; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Modified Blumgart Mattress Suture Versus Conventional Interrupted Suture in Pancreaticojejunostomy During Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Seiko Hirono; Manabu Kawai; Ken-Ichi Okada; Motoki Miyazawa; Yuji Kitahata; Shinya Hayami; Masaki Ueno; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 12.969

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.