Literature DB >> 33633881

National Institutes of Health Funding in Internal Medicine: Analysis of Physicians Receiving an R01 Grant Between 2008 and 2017.

Erich J Berg1, Anthony Santarelli2, John Ashurst2.   

Abstract

Introduction As the world's largest funding source for biomedical research, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) supports physician-scientists with a discipline-specific R01 grant. Recently, scholarly activity disparities regarding investigator degree and gender have been highlighted in the medical literature among allopathic and osteopathic investigators of various medical backgrounds. We aimed to assess trends in internal medicine NIH R01 grants over the past decade. Methodology Internal medicine R01 funding was retrospectively obtained from a centralized online NIH database encompassing 2008 through 2017. Principal investigators (PIs) were then categorized by gender and academic degree(s). Two-way analysis of variance was used to analyze NIH grant funding trends over the time period studied. Results A total of 5,089 NIH R01s were awarded to internal medicine PIs, with an average value per grant of $469,270. Awardees were predominantly male (71.5%, 3,639/5,089). Most awards were issued to PIs with an MD degree (62.4%, 3,173/5,089), followed by PhD degree (36.3%, 1,845/5,089). DOs accounted for five awards over the time period studied (0.15%). MDs were awarded higher funding than PhDs ($466,494 and $421,576, p < 0.001), and females were awarded higher amounts than males ($462,771 and $444,868, p < 0.001). Investigators who held a second degree received more funding than PIs with a single degree ($476,693 and $439,693, p < 0.001). Conclusion In the decade under investigation, both gender and degree disparities existed within NIH R01 funding for PIs in the field of internal medicine, and osteopathic representation accounted for a paucity of R01 funding.
Copyright © 2021, Berg et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  grant; internal medicine; investigator; national institutes of health (nih); r01

Year:  2021        PMID: 33633881      PMCID: PMC7899272          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  8 in total

1.  Bibliometric measures and National Institutes of Health funding at colleges of osteopathic medicine, 2006-2010.

Authors:  Richard R Suminski; Dean Hendrix; Linda E May; Jason A Wasserman; V James Guillory
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  2012-11

2.  Medical Degree Disparity Among Authors in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals.

Authors:  Brian Merritt; Thomas Simunich; John Ashurst
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  2019-02-01

3.  Difference in R01 Grant Funding Among Osteopathic and Allopathic Emergency Physicians over the Last Decade.

Authors:  Martina Antony; Jennifer Savino; John Ashurst
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-04-17

4.  Patterns of Recent National Institutes of Health (NIH) Funding in General Surgery: Analysis Using the NIH RePORTER System.

Authors:  Erich J Berg; John Ashurst
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-06-19

5.  National Institutes of Health Funding in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Analysis of R01 Grants by Degree and Gender.

Authors:  Erich J Berg; John Ashurst
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-05-17

6.  Authorship Trends of Emergency Medicine Publications over the Last Two Decades.

Authors:  Richard Lammers; Thomas Simunich; John Ashurst
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-05-05

7.  Quantitative Description of Osteopathic Physician Authorship in Prominent Neurosurgery Journals Since 1944: Coming of Age?

Authors:  Joshua A Cuoco; Christopher M Busch; Cara M Rogers; Evin L Guilliams; Brendan J Klein; Gregory A Howes; Eric A Marvin
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-08-09

8.  Patterns of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding in Family Medicine: Analysis Using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results System.

Authors:  Erich J Berg; John Ashurst
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-10-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.