Literature DB >> 33633621

Interaction Between Sex and Cardiac Interoceptive Accuracy in Measures of Induced Pain.

Eszter Ferentzi1, Mattis Geiger2, Sandra A Mai-Lippold3, Ferenc Köteles1, Christian Montag4, Olga Pollatos3.   

Abstract

Pain perception is influenced by several factors, and among them, affect, sex, and perception of bodily signals are assumed to play a prominent role. The aim of the present study is to explore how sex, cardiac interoceptive accuracy, and the interaction of the latter two influence the perception of experimentally induced pain. We investigated a large sample of young adults (n = 159, 50.9% female, age: 23.45, SD = 3.767), assessing current positive and negative affective state with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (both involved as control variables), cardiac interoceptive accuracy with the mental heartbeat tracking task, and pain sensitivity with electrical stimulation on the back of the dominant hand, applying a repeated-measures staircase protocol. Males showed a significantly higher pain threshold and tolerance level than females, whereas cardiac interoceptive accuracy was not associated with pain sensitivity. The impact of sex × cardiac interoceptive accuracy interaction was significant for pain threshold only, while pain tolerance was predicted only by sex. According to these findings, the associations between pain sensitivity, cardiac IAc, and sex might be more complicated than it was supposed in previous studies. Interactions between factors impacting pain perception appear worthy of further investigation.
Copyright © 2021 Ferentzi, Geiger, Mai-Lippold, Köteles, Montag and Pollatos.

Entities:  

Keywords:  affect; cardiac interoceptive accuracy; interoception; pain perception; sex differences

Year:  2021        PMID: 33633621      PMCID: PMC7900538          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  62 in total

1.  Heartbeat evoked potentials (HEP): topography and influence of cardiac awareness and focus of attention.

Authors:  P Montoya; R Schandry; A Müller
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993 May-Jun

2.  The heartbeat counting task largely involves non-interoceptive processes: Evidence from both the original and an adapted counting task.

Authors:  Olivier Desmedt; Olivier Luminet; Olivier Corneille
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  The James-Lange theory of emotions: a critical examination and an alternative theory. By Walter B. Cannon, 1927.

Authors:  W B Cannon
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1987 Fall-Winter

4.  A heartfelt response to Zimprich et al. (2020), and Ainley et al. (2020)'s commentaries: Acknowledging issues with the HCT would benefit interoception research.

Authors:  Olivier Corneille; Olivier Desmedt; Giorgia Zamariola; Olivier Luminet; Pierre Maurage
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  The effects of physical fitness and exercise on cardiac awareness.

Authors:  W A Montgomery; G E Jones; J G Hollandsworth
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  Heart beat perception and emotional experience.

Authors:  R Schandry
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Pain-related emotions modulate experimental pain perception and autonomic responses.

Authors:  Pierre Rainville; Quoc Viet Huynh Bao; Pablo Chrétien
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Contribution of Time Estimation and Knowledge to Heartbeat Counting Task Performance under Original and Adapted Instructions.

Authors:  Olivier Desmedt; Olivier Corneille; Olivier Luminet; Jennifer Murphy; Geoffrey Bird; Pierre Maurage
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Bolus isoproterenol infusions provide a reliable method for assessing interoceptive awareness.

Authors:  S S Khalsa; D Rudrauf; C Sandesara; B Olshansky; D Tranel
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 10.  Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings.

Authors:  Roger B Fillingim; Christopher D King; Margarete C Ribeiro-Dasilva; Bridgett Rahim-Williams; Joseph L Riley
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.820

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mental heartbeat tracking and rating of emotional pictures are not related.

Authors:  Eszter Ferentzi; Luca Vig; Mats Julin Lindkjølen; Markus Erling Lien; Ferenc Köteles
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-09-23

2.  Randomized cross-over evaluation of investigator gender on pain thresholds in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Anna Sellgren Engskov; Ilja Lejbman; Jonas Åkeson
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.