Literature DB >> 33633601

Less Social Support for Patients With COVID-19: Comparison With the Experience of Nurses.

Zhenyu Li1, Jingwu Ge1, Jianping Feng1, Riyue Jiang2, Qin Zhou2, Xiaolin Xu3, Yinbing Pan1, Shijiang Liu1, Bo Gui1, Zhongyun Wang1, Bin Zhu4, Yimin Hu5, Jianjun Yang6, Rong Wang7, Dongan Su8, Kenji Hashimoto9, Meiling Yang1, Chun Yang1, Cunming Liu1.   

Abstract

Context: Since December 2019, more than 80,000 patients have been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. Social support status of COVID-19 patients, especially the impact of social support on their psychological status and quality of life, needs to be addressed with increasing concern.
Objectives: In this study, we used social support rating scale (SSRS) to investigate the social support in COVID-19 patients and nurses.
Methods: The present study included 186 COVID-19 patients at a Wuhan mobile cabin hospital and 234 nurses at a Wuhan COVID-19 control center. Responses to a mobile phone app-based questionnaire about social support, anxiety, depression, and quality of life were recorded and evaluated.
Results: COVID-19 patients scored significantly lower than nurses did on the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS). Among these patients, 33.9% had anxiety symptoms, while 23.7% had depression symptoms. Overall SSRS, subjective social support scores and objective support scores of patients with anxiety were lower than those of patients without anxiety. This result was also found in depression. In addition, all dimensions of social support were positively correlated with quality of life. Interestingly, in all dimensions of social support, subjective support was found to be an independent predictive factor for anxiety, depression, and quality of life, whereas objective support was a predictive factor for quality of life, but not for anxiety and depression via regression analysis.
Conclusion: Medical staffs should pay attention to the subjective feelings of patients and make COVID-19 patients feel respected, supported, and understood from the perspective of subjective support, which may greatly benefit patients, alleviate their anxiety and depression, and improve their quality of life.
Copyright © 2021 Li, Ge, Feng, Jiang, Zhou, Xu, Pan, Liu, Gui, Wang, Zhu, Hu, Yang, Wang, Su, Hashimoto, Yang, Yang and Liu.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; anxiety; depression; medical staff; social support

Year:  2021        PMID: 33633601      PMCID: PMC7901979          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.554435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychiatry        ISSN: 1664-0640            Impact factor:   4.157


  33 in total

1.  PTSD and depression in adult survivors of flood fury in Kashmir: The payoffs of social support.

Authors:  Kaiser Ahmad Dar; Naved Iqbal; Ankit Prakash; Mohd Altaf Paul
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 2.  Stress, coping, and social support processes: where are we? What next?

Authors:  P A Thoits
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1995

Review 3.  Social factors in psychopathology: stress, social support, and coping processes.

Authors:  R C Kessler; R H Price; C B Wortman
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Chronic disease and mental disorder.

Authors:  Peter F M Verhaak; Monique J W M Heijmans; Loe Peters; Mieke Rijken
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Maternal social support, quality of birth experience, and post-partum depression in primiparous women.

Authors:  Franca Tani; Valeria Castagna
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2016-05-20

Review 6.  Depression and immunity: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  T B Herbert; S Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Prevalence and predisposing factors of depressive symptoms in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional single-center study.

Authors:  Yeshun Wu; Bin Zhu; Zijun Chen; Jiahao Duan; Ailin Luo; Ling Yang; Chun Yang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 5.682

8.  Vicarious traumatization in the general public, members, and non-members of medical teams aiding in COVID-19 control.

Authors:  Zhenyu Li; Jingwu Ge; Meiling Yang; Jianping Feng; Mei Qiao; Riyue Jiang; Jiangjiang Bi; Gaofeng Zhan; Xiaolin Xu; Long Wang; Qin Zhou; Chenliang Zhou; Yinbing Pan; Shijiang Liu; Haiwei Zhang; Jianjun Yang; Bin Zhu; Yimin Hu; Kenji Hashimoto; Yan Jia; Haofei Wang; Rong Wang; Cunming Liu; Chun Yang
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 7.217

9.  Call for Action to Address Equity and Justice Divide During COVID-19.

Authors:  Sonu Bhaskar; Aarushi Rastogi; Koravangattu Valsraj Menon; Beena Kunheri; Sindhu Balakrishnan; Jeremy Howick
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Neighbourhood environment, physical activity, quality of life and depressive symptoms in Hong Kong older adults: a protocol for an observational study.

Authors:  Ester Cerin; Cindy H P Sit; Casper J P Zhang; Anthony Barnett; Martin M C Cheung; Poh-Chin Lai; Janice M Johnston; Ruby S Y Lee
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  2 in total

1.  Investigating Frontline Nurse Stress: Perceptions of Job Demands, Organizational Support, and Social Support During the Current COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Haneen Ali; Yasin Fatemi; Duha Ali; Mohammad Hamasha; Sa'd Hamasha
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Psychological Impact of the Lockdown Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic in University Workers: Factors Related to Stress, Anxiety, and Depression.

Authors:  Alejandro Salazar; Jenifer Palomo-Osuna; Helena de Sola; Jose A Moral-Munoz; María Dueñas; Inmaculada Failde
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.