Ilaria Floris1, Thorsten Rose2, Juan Antonio Collado Rojas3, Kurt Appel2, Camille Roesch4, Beatrice Lejeune1. 1. Preclinical Research, Clinical Research, Regulatory Affairs Departments, Labo'Life France, Nantes, France. 2. VivaCell Biotechnology GmbH, Denzlingen, Germany. 3. Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain. 4. Izon Science Europe SAS, Lyon, France.
Abstract
Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) are pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in acute and chronic inflammatory diseases. Indeed, immunotherapy blocking these 2 cytokines has been developed. Micro-immunotherapy (MI) also uses ultra-low doses (ULD) of pro-inflammatory cytokines, impregnated on lactose-sucrose pillules, to counteract their overexpression. The study has been conducted with 2 objectives: examine the anti-inflammatory effect in vitro and the capacity of 2 unitary medicines, TNF-α (27 CH) and IL-1β (27 CH), to reduce the secretion of TNF-α in human primary monocytes and THP-1 cells differentiated with phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate, after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exposure; then, investigate the presence of particles possibly containing starting materials using tunable resistive pulse sensing technique. The results show that the unitary medicines, tested at 3 pillules concentrations (5.5, 11 and 22 mM), have reduced the secretion of TNF-α in both models by about 10-20% vs. vehicle control, depending on concentration. In this exploratory study, particles (150-1000 nm) have been detected in MI ULD-impregnated pillules and a hypothesis for MI medicines mode of action has been proposed. Conscious that more evaluations are necessary, authors are cautious in the conclusions because the findings described in the study are still limited, and future investigations may lead to different hypothesis.
Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) are pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in acute and chronic inflammatory diseases. Indeed, immunotherapy blocking these 2 cytokines has been developed. Micro-immunotherapy (MI) also uses ultra-low doses (ULD) of pro-inflammatory cytokines, impregnated on lactose-sucrose pillules, to counteract their overexpression. The study has been conducted with 2 objectives: examine the anti-inflammatory effect in vitro and the capacity of 2 unitary medicines, TNF-α (27 CH) and IL-1β (27 CH), to reduce the secretion of TNF-α in human primary monocytes and THP-1 cells differentiated with phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate, after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exposure; then, investigate the presence of particles possibly containing starting materials using tunable resistive pulse sensing technique. The results show that the unitary medicines, tested at 3 pillules concentrations (5.5, 11 and 22 mM), have reduced the secretion of TNF-α in both models by about 10-20% vs. vehicle control, depending on concentration. In this exploratory study, particles (150-1000 nm) have been detected in MI ULD-impregnated pillules and a hypothesis for MI medicines mode of action has been proposed. Conscious that more evaluations are necessary, authors are cautious in the conclusions because the findings described in the study are still limited, and future investigations may lead to different hypothesis.
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in a wide
range of acute and chronic inflammatory diseases. Indeed, TNF-α inhibitors have been
developed to manage immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), such as
rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis, inflammatory bowel diseases, and
psoriasis with or without complicating arthritis.[1] TNF-α was the first cytokine to be fully validated as a therapeutic target
for the treatment of RA.[1] Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) is a highly active pro-inflammatory cytokine also
involved in IMIDs, in pain,[2] and in tissue damage after chronic inflammation.[3] Monotherapies blocking IL-1 activity, as well as TNF-α inhibitors, have been
developed to reduce IMIDs symptoms severity.[3] Beside the benefits of approved pro-inflammatory cytokines inhibitors, many
side effects have been reported.[4] In addition, individual variability in drug response has been described,
sometimes a progressive loss of response, or even a complete lack of response, which
confirms the complexity of the immune responses and the existence of an individual
drug compensatory adaptation.[5]On the other side, micro-immunotherapy (MI) aims to help the organism using its
resources and strategies taking advantage of immune system adaptation.MI medicines are lactose-sucrose pillules, also called globules, for oromucosal
administration, which are impregnated with ethanolic preparations of immune
mediators and nucleic acids at ultra-low doses (ULD), or at low doses (LD). The
composition of MI medicines is expressed as number of Centesimal Hahnemannian
dilutions (CH), as in traditional homeopathic medicines.[6-13] LD range from 3 to 7 CH and aim at stimulating the expression of specific
proteins and molecular pathways, for example to reduce oxidative stress,[7] while ULD aim at regulating (from 8 to 10 CH) and/or inhibiting (higher than
10 CH) the expression of certain key proteins involved in IMIDs, to reestablish the
homeostasis. TNF-α and IL-1β are therapeutic targets used in MI at inhibiting ULD to
counteract their overexpression.[6]It has been shown that 2LARTH®, which contains the cytokines TNF-α and
IL-1β at 17 CH, as well as other immune regulators, exerts an anti-inflammatory
effect in vitro
[6] and in vivo
[9] respectively, by reducing the TNF-α and IL-1β secretion on human primary
monocytes exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and by reducing the systemic levels
of TNF-α in a murine model of RA.In order to perform fundamental research, it has been examined the anti-inflammatory
effect of 1 single pro-inflammatory cytokine at a time, TNF-α or IL-1β, both at 27
CH, using 2 different cellular models of inflammation exposed to LPS: human primary
enriched monocytes from healthy donors, and THP-1 cell line differentiated with
phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA).In the last couple of years, in vitro,[6-8] and in vivo
[9,10] studies reported evidence about the safety, the biological activity, and the
efficacy of MI medicines. Furthermore, clinical data also described the potential
benefit of the therapy in several acute[11] and chronic diseases.[12,13] Nevertheless, further investigations are needed to comprehend, at the
molecular level, the mechanism of MI. The hypothesized mode of action of LD and ULD,
on which MI medicines are based, mainly involves 2 conserved core biological
features: i) all organisms, cells and tissues, particularly the immune system, can
respond to a multitude of stimuli, in a wide range of concentrations, according to a
non-linear dose−response curve, also called biphasic or hormetic response[14]; ii) all organisms, tissues and cells have the capacity to adapt to
environmental signals and stressors with a high plasticity and with the aim to
reestablish the homeostasis.[15]Recent discoveries conducted by the Jayesh Bellare’s team on homeopathic remedies
revealed that ultra-high potencies do not reach the point where no molecule of the
active substance is left, but always retain starting material from the original
preparation in form of nanoparticles (NPs), reaching an asymptote of few pg/mL.[16] The studies of Chikramane et al. describe “how” and “why” the intense
turbulence caused by the succussion/dynamization process, induces the formation of
air-nanobubbles and the further NPs levitation to the surface.[16,17] According to the so-called “surface monolayer hypothesis,” the NPs of
starting material form a monolayer on the liquid surface, that is preserved in spite
of the serial dilutions, and that it is responsible of the asymptote formation.[17] It is important to highlight that Bellare’s team used metal powders as
starting raw materials, and 90% v/v ethanol as solvent, to prepare the high
potencies. The research group has gone further in their investigation with the
homeopathic potencies, evaluating their biological effects and demonstrating that
metal NPs are able to induce hormetic responses in vitro.
[18] Other research groups, including Van Wassenhoven et al,
investigated the presence of metal NPs in homeopathic dilutions that use water as
solvent, but did not confirm the same findings.[19]Another line of evidence proposes the “silica hypothesis,” which is based on the
presence of silica nanostructures in homeopathic potencies, generated during the
succussion/dynamization process, by detachment from the walls of the glass
containers used.[20]Since MI medicines are manufactured according to the fundamental processes of
homeopathic remedies, it has been performed an exploratory study aimed at
investigating the presence of small particles possibly containing starting materials
directly in the final pharmaceutical product, lactose-sucrose pillules impregnated
with TNF-α at 27 CH, or with IL-1β at 27 CH. A proper vehicle control was included
in the tests, lactose-sucrose pillules impregnated with the only solvent without
active substances.Definitely, the study has been carried out with 2 major objectives: first of all, to
examine the anti-inflammatory effect and the capacity of 2 unitary medicines, TNF-α
(27 CH) and IL-1β (27 CH), to reduce the secretion of TNF-α induced by LPS in human
primary enriched monocytes and in PMA-differentiated THP-1 cell line; then, to
investigate the presence of small particles possibly containing starting materials
in the same 2 unitary medicines using the qNano Gold, an instrument produced and
commercialized by Izon Science, that utilizes the technique of tunable resistive
pulse sensing (TRPS). TRPS is a method for sensing and analyzing small particles
dispersed in aqueous electrolytes. It uses an electric field which is applied across
a pore, also called nanopore. Ions move between the electrodes through the nanopore,
creating a baseline current and, when a particle passes through the pore, the ionic
current is momentarily blocked and a “resistive pulse” is observed. Finally, these
resistive pulses reveal information about particles size, counting, and concentration.[21]
Materials and Methods
Tested Items
The 2 unitary medicines consist of lactose-sucrose pillules impregnated with
ethanolic preparation (96% water/ethanol) of human recombinant (hr)-TNF-α or
hr-IL-1β at 27 CH. The 2 cytokines were produced by recombinant technology,
under good manufacturing practice (GMP) conditions, in the clean room of
Labo’Life Spain’s laboratory. ULD are obtained by diluting 1 µg of the cytokines
in 1 ml of endotoxin free water for injection (Ph. Eur.) and up to 1 CH, then in
ethanol 96 per cent V/V (Ph. Eur. BDH Chemicals) up to 27 CH. Serial Kinetic
Process (SKP) was achieved using STELLA secro 88 amber 20 ml glass bottle (Ph.
Eur. STELLA Kunststofftechnik Gmbh.), closed with STELLA secro 88 II
polypropylene screw cap, with sealing disk (Ph. Eur. STELLA Kunststofftechnik
Gmbh.). SKP consists of a kinetic vertical processing of 100 succussions
generated by a dynamizator (Dynamat 50CS, Labotics bvba). Both unitary medicines
were prepared according to the European Pharmacopeia monographs 1038 and 2371
(current edition). The lactose-sucrose pillules impregnated with the only
solvent, ethanol 96 per cent V/V (Ph. Eur. BDH Chemicals), without any active
substance, were used as vehicle control in all experiments.
Cytotoxicity Assay
Blood samples from 3 healthy human donors (male or female, aged between 18 and 68
years, blood tested as for transfusion, full information and medical
questionnaire available in German on www.uniklinik-freiburg.de), were collected at the University
Medical Center of Freiburg (Germany). Written informed consent was obtained from
all donors. The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Albert
Ludwigs University of Freiburg.Human primary enriched monocytes were prepared from buffy coats following a
standardized procedure,[22] recently described.[6] Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 220,000 cells/well.[6] Both unitary medicines and vehicle pillules were dissolved in cell
culture media and cells were exposed to 6 different lactose/sucrose
concentrations (1.37, 2.75, 5.5, 11, 22 and 44 mM). After 24 hours of
incubation, 10 µl of AlamarBlue® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)
was added to each well. Then, fluorescence was measured with a fluorescence
spectrophotometer using 544EX nm /590EM nm filter settings. The experiment was
performed in quadruplicates.
TNF-α Secretion in Human Primary Enriched Monocytes Exposed to LPS and
Treated With Unitary Medicines
Cells were seeded in 24-well plates (2.2 million cells/well) and incubated at
37°C with 5% CO2. As previously described, 30 minutes prior to LPS
stimulation, cells were exposed to different concentrations (5.5, 11 and 44 mM)
of unitary medicines (TNF-α at 27 CH or IL-1β at 27 CH) or vehicle and incubated
for 24 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2.[6] Then, supernatants were removed, centrifuged, and investigated for TNF-α
secretion using commercially available single analyte ELISA kits (Immunotools,
Friesoythe, Germany). The protocol used followed the manufacturer’s instruction.
The experiment was performed in triplicates.
TNF-α Secretion in Differentiated THP-1 Cells Exposed to LPS or IL-1β to
Induce Inflammation
THP-1 cells were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in RPMI 1440
supplemented with 10% FCS and antibiotics. 500,000 cells/well were seeded in
24-well plates and treated with PMA (150 nM) for 24 hours. After
differentiation, cells were exposed to LPS (1 μg/mL), IL-1β (10 ng/mL) or IL-1β
(50 ng/mL) to induce inflammation. Then, supernatants were removed, centrifuged,
and investigated for TNF-α secretion using commercially available single analyte
ELISA kits (Immunotools, Friesoythe, Germany). The protocol used followed the
manufacturer’s instruction. The experiment was performed in triplicates.
TNF-α Secretion in Differentiated THP-1 Cells Exposed to LPS and Treated With
Unitary Medicines
PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells were pre-treated with different concentrations
(5.5, 11 and 44 mM) of unitary medicines (TNF-α at 27 CH or IL-1β at 27 CH) or
vehicle for 30 min and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h at 37°C and 5%
CO2. Then supernatants were removed, centrifuged, and
investigated for TNF-α concentrations (pg/mL) using commercially available
single analyte ELISA kits (Immunotools, Friesoythe, Germany). The protocol used
followed the manufacturer’s instruction. Three independent experiments were
performed in triplicates.
Particles Measurements and Data Collection
TRPS measurements were performed using the qNano Gold (Izon Science). In order to
be analyzed, samples must be diluted in an electrolyte solution. Therefore, all
samples were prepared by diluting the content of each capsule (380 mg of
sucrose-lactose pillules) of TNF-α (27 CH), IL-1β (27 CH), and vehicle, in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). PBS was sterilized by filtration through 0.22
µm membrane filter before being used to dilute the sugar pillules.The first test was performed using the membrane pore (or nanopore) NP200 rated
for 80−500 nm particles. The samples were diluted in 1 mL of PBS before being
analyzed. The pulse signal was calibrated with a 200 nm polystyrene particle
standard supplied by Izon Science with a 1 x 1012 particles/mL
concentration.Because particles bigger than 500 nm were present in samples, obtruding sometimes
the nanopore, 2 more tests were performed on 2 different days.For the second and third tests, samples were analyzed by using the NP1000, rated
for 490–2900 nm particles. Each sample was diluted in 1 mL of PBS, then was
further diluted in PBS 1:2 before being analyzed. The pulse signal was
calibrated with a 950 nm polystyrene particle standard supplied by Izon Science,
with a 5.2 x 1010 particles/mL concentration. Measurements were made
with 46.95 mm of stretch being applied to the elastic membrane and a potential
0.10 V being applied across the pore. 35 µL of diluted sample was loaded into
the top fluid cell and 75 µL of measurement electrolyte PBS was loaded into the
bottom fluid cell. 10 Pa of pressure was applied to the top fluid cell.Izon Control Suite Software has collected all data about particles size and
concentration, and it has generated histograms and graphs to represent the
particles distribution.
Statistical Analysis
Authors have followed the recent recommendations encouraging data transparency[23] by plotting independent data points in graphs so that readers may
“interpret the data for themselves, rather than showing possibly misleading
P values or error bars.” Indeed, descriptive statistics was
preferred to statistical inferences.
Results
Cell Viability Test
Human enriched monocytes from 3 donors were treated with 6 different
lactose-sucrose pillules concentrations, ranging from 1.37 mM to 44 mM, of
vehicle or unitary medicines: TNF-α (27 CH), or IL 1β (27 CH). The experiment
included the condition in which cells were cultured only with complete medium,
(control). After 24 hours, cell viability was evaluated by AlamarBlue®. Samples
were run in quadruplicates. Viability in control was set 100%. As shown in Figure 1, all tested
concentrations of unitary MI medicines, and of vehicle, have not affected the
viability of human primary enriched monocytes, that ranged between 64% (minimum)
and 86% (maximum).
Figure 1.
Human enriched monocytes viability examination after exposure to unitary
MI medicines or vehicle diluted pillules. Human enriched monocytes were
treated for 24 hours with: complete medium (control), or 6 different
concentrations, ranging from 1.37 mM to 44 mM, of unitary medicines or
vehicle lactose-sucrose pillules. The graph shows the percentage of cell
viability evaluated by AlamarBlue®. Data were expressed as mean ± SD
percentage (vs. control, 100%) of 3 donors measured in quadruplicates.
Minimum and maximum values are indicated in the graph.
Human enriched monocytes viability examination after exposure to unitary
MI medicines or vehicle diluted pillules. Human enriched monocytes were
treated for 24 hours with: complete medium (control), or 6 different
concentrations, ranging from 1.37 mM to 44 mM, of unitary medicines or
vehicle lactose-sucrose pillules. The graph shows the percentage of cell
viability evaluated by AlamarBlue®. Data were expressed as mean ± SD
percentage (vs. control, 100%) of 3 donors measured in quadruplicates.
Minimum and maximum values are indicated in the graph.
The Effect of 2 Unitary MI Medicines on TNF-α Secretion in Human Primary
Enriched Monocytes
Human monocytes respond to LPS by expressing many inflammatory cytokines.[6,24] In particular, the authors investigated the secretion of TNF-α in
LPS-exposed enriched monocytes from 3 donors, exposed for 24 hours to different
pillules concentrations (5.5, 11 and 22 mM) of unitary MI medicines TNF-α (27
CH), IL-1β (27 CH) or vehicle. Figure 2 shows the secreted levels of TNF-α, expressed as mean ± SD
percentage vs. vehicle, set 100%. At the pillules concentration
of 5.5 mM, the 2 tested unitary MI medicines have not exerted an effect on TNF-α
secretion levels compared to vehicle (Figure 2A); at the pillules concentration
of 11 mM, the 3 donors responded in a similar manner to both unitary medicines
with a reduction of TNF-α levels of about 20% compared to vehicle (Figure 2B). The responses
of the 3 donors to both unitary medicines are comparable, as shown in
Supplementary Figure 1B. Doubling the pillules concentration from 11 to 22 mM,
the effect did not increase; on the contrary, TNF-α secretion appears to have
diminished as it can be observed a reduction of about 10% compared to vehicle
(Figure 2C).
Figure 2.
Effect of unitary medicines on TNF-α secretion in human primary monocytes
exposed to LPS to induce inflammation. Cultured human enriched monocytes
from 3 donors, exposed to 10 ng/mL of LPS for 24 hours, were treated
with 3 concentrations: (A) 5.5 mM, (B) 11 mM, or (C) 22 mM of unitary MI
medicines (TNF-α at 27 CH represented with green dots; or IL-1β at 27 CH
represented with orange dots) or vehicle (gray dots). Cell medium was
collected and TNF-α secretion was measured by ELISA. In graphs are
represented individual values, mean ± SD percentage vs.
LPS + vehicle, which was set at 100%.
Effect of unitary medicines on TNF-α secretion in human primary monocytes
exposed to LPS to induce inflammation. Cultured human enriched monocytes
from 3 donors, exposed to 10 ng/mL of LPS for 24 hours, were treated
with 3 concentrations: (A) 5.5 mM, (B) 11 mM, or (C) 22 mM of unitary MI
medicines (TNF-α at 27 CH represented with green dots; or IL-1β at 27 CH
represented with orange dots) or vehicle (gray dots). Cell medium was
collected and TNF-α secretion was measured by ELISA. In graphs are
represented individual values, mean ± SD percentage vs.
LPS + vehicle, which was set at 100%.
The Effect of 2 Unitary MI Medicines on TNF-α Secretion in PMA-Exposed THP-1
Cells
In order to evaluate the effect on a cell line, authors established another
in vitro model of inflammation to test the 2 unitary MI
medicines. THP-1 cells were differentiated with PMA (150 nM) for 24 hours, then
cells were exposed to LPS (1 μg/mL), or IL-1β (10 ng/mL), or IL-1β (50 ng/mL)
for 24 hours, to induce the secretion of cytokines, in particular of TNF-α. As
the highest levels of TNF-α were obtained using LPS as inflammatory stimulus
(Figure 3),
PMA-differentiated and LPS-exposed THP-1 cells have been selected and used as a
model of inflammation to test the specific anti-inflammatory effect of the 2
medicines.
Figure 3.
TNF-α secretion in differentiated THP-1 cells exposed to LPS or IL-1β to
induce inflammation. THP-1 cells were differentiated with the use of PMA
(150 nM) for 24 h. After differentiation, cells were exposed to LPS (1
μg/mL), IL-1β (10 ng/mL) or IL-1β (50 ng/mL) to induce inflammation.
Untreated cells were included in the experiment (ctr), too. After 24
hours, cell medium was collected and TNF-α secretion was evaluated by
ELISA. In graphs are represented mean values (pg/mL) ± SD.
TNF-α secretion in differentiated THP-1 cells exposed to LPS or IL-1β to
induce inflammation. THP-1 cells were differentiated with the use of PMA
(150 nM) for 24 h. After differentiation, cells were exposed to LPS (1
μg/mL), IL-1β (10 ng/mL) or IL-1β (50 ng/mL) to induce inflammation.
Untreated cells were included in the experiment (ctr), too. After 24
hours, cell medium was collected and TNF-α secretion was evaluated by
ELISA. In graphs are represented mean values (pg/mL) ± SD.At the pillules concentration of 5.5 mM, the 2 tested unitary medicines have
reduced the TNF-α secretion compared to vehicle by about 20% (Figure 4A). At the
pillules concentration of 11 mM, the effect of both tested items on TNF-α
secretion is similar to the one observed in cells treated with 5.5 mM (Figure 4B). When doubling
the pillules concentration from 11 to 22 mM, the effect did not increase, but on
the contrary, it diminished (Figure 4C).
Figure 4.
Effect of unitary MI medicines on TNF-α secretion in treated
PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells exposed to LPS to induce inflammation.
THP-1 cells were treated with PMA (150 nM) for 24 h. Then, cells were
pre-treated with 3 concentrations: (A) 5.5 mM, (B) 11 mM, or (C) 22 mM
of unitary MI medicines (TNF-α at 27 CH represented with green dots;
IL-1β at 27 CH represented with orange dots; vehicle represented with
gray dots) for 30 min and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h. Cell
medium was collected and TNF-α secretion was evaluated by ELISA. In
graphs are represented individual values, mean (of 3 independent
experiments made in triplicates) ± SD percentage vs.
LPS + vehicle, which was set at 100%.
Effect of unitary MI medicines on TNF-α secretion in treated
PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells exposed to LPS to induce inflammation.
THP-1 cells were treated with PMA (150 nM) for 24 h. Then, cells were
pre-treated with 3 concentrations: (A) 5.5 mM, (B) 11 mM, or (C) 22 mM
of unitary MI medicines (TNF-α at 27 CH represented with green dots;
IL-1β at 27 CH represented with orange dots; vehicle represented with
gray dots) for 30 min and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h. Cell
medium was collected and TNF-α secretion was evaluated by ELISA. In
graphs are represented individual values, mean (of 3 independent
experiments made in triplicates) ± SD percentage vs.
LPS + vehicle, which was set at 100%.
Raw Particles Concentration and Distribution in Impregnated Pillules
Pillules (vehicle and unitary medicines) have been diluted in PBS in order to
allow the passage of the ionic current throughout the nanopore and to be
analyzed by the qNano, as described in material and methods.The first measurement has been performed using the nanopore NP200, which is rated
for particles with a diameter ranging from 80 to 500 nm. Figure 5A shows the raw concentration
values (or number of particles per mL) of particles found in diluted
vehicle-impregnated pillules (6.7 x 107 particles/mL) and TNF-α (27
CH)- or IL-1β (27 CH)-impregnated pillules (respectively 2.2 x 108
particles/mL, and 8.4 x 108 particles/mL).
Figure 5.
Raw concentrations of particles present in impregnated pillules, obtained
by using 2 different nanopores, NP200 and NP1000. (A) The 2 unitary MI
medicines TNF-α (27 CH), IL-1β (27 CH), as well as vehicle impregnated
pillules, were diluted in PBS (1 capsule of 380 mg in 1 mL), then
analyzed by qNano using a NP200 nanopore, rated for 80-500 nm particles.
The values of the raw concentrations, expressing the number of particles
per mL, are reported in the graph. (B) Because the first analysis
revealed the presence of particles bigger than 500 nm, 2 more tests were
performed using a NP1000 nanopore, rated for 490–2900 nm particles.
TNF-α (27 CH), IL-1β (27 CH), or vehicle impregnated pillules were
diluted in PBS, (1 capsule of 380 mg in 1 mL, then further diluted 1:2)
before being analyzed. The values of the raw concentrations, expressing
the number of particles per mL, measured in 2 different days, are shown
in the graph.
Raw concentrations of particles present in impregnated pillules, obtained
by using 2 different nanopores, NP200 and NP1000. (A) The 2 unitary MI
medicines TNF-α (27 CH), IL-1β (27 CH), as well as vehicle impregnated
pillules, were diluted in PBS (1 capsule of 380 mg in 1 mL), then
analyzed by qNano using a NP200 nanopore, rated for 80-500 nm particles.
The values of the raw concentrations, expressing the number of particles
per mL, are reported in the graph. (B) Because the first analysis
revealed the presence of particles bigger than 500 nm, 2 more tests were
performed using a NP1000 nanopore, rated for 490–2900 nm particles.
TNF-α (27 CH), IL-1β (27 CH), or vehicle impregnated pillules were
diluted in PBS, (1 capsule of 380 mg in 1 mL, then further diluted 1:2)
before being analyzed. The values of the raw concentrations, expressing
the number of particles per mL, measured in 2 different days, are shown
in the graph.In the light of the results, even if those pillules impregnated with the only
vehicle solution do contain small particles, TNF-α (27 CH)-impregnated pillules
have been found to be 3.3 more concentrated than vehicle, and IL-1β (27
CH)-impregnated pillules appeared to be 12 times more concentrated than
vehicle.qNano can provide more information, like the arithmetic mean of particles
diameter. These are the values obtained in the first test for vehicle, TNF-α (27
CH) and IL-1β (27 CH): 185 nm, 157 nm and 209 nm, respectively. In addition, the
software can analyze the data generating graphs that combine data from multiple
samples. In order to highlight eventual differences in particle distribution
between vehicle and unitary medicines, 2 graphs have been generated, shown in
Figure 6 A and B,
representing the particles distribution of TNF-α (27 CH) together with the
vehicle, or IL-1β (27 CH) together with the vehicle.
Figure 6.
Distribution of particles present in impregnated pillules and acquired by
using 2 different nanopores, NP200 and NP1000. The particles
distribution measured in diluted pillules, TNF-α (27 CH) together with
vehicle-impregnated pillules (A), as well as the distribution of
particles in diluted pillules impregnated with IL-1β (27 CH) or with
vehicle (B), obtained in the first analysis with NP200, is represented
in graphs. Samples were also run using the NP1000 nanopore, rated for
490–2900 nm particles. The distribution of bigger particles measured in
diluted pillules, impregnated with TNF-α (27 CH) and vehicle (C), as
well as with IL-1β (27 CH) and vehicle (D), is represented in
graphs.
Distribution of particles present in impregnated pillules and acquired by
using 2 different nanopores, NP200 and NP1000. The particles
distribution measured in diluted pillules, TNF-α (27 CH) together with
vehicle-impregnated pillules (A), as well as the distribution of
particles in diluted pillules impregnated with IL-1β (27 CH) or with
vehicle (B), obtained in the first analysis with NP200, is represented
in graphs. Samples were also run using the NP1000 nanopore, rated for
490–2900 nm particles. The distribution of bigger particles measured in
diluted pillules, impregnated with TNF-α (27 CH) and vehicle (C), as
well as with IL-1β (27 CH) and vehicle (D), is represented in
graphs.The second and the third measurements, performed on 2 different days, employed
the use of a larger nanopore, NP1000, rated for particles ranging from 490 to
2900 nm. Figure 5B shows
the raw concentration values present in vehicle-impregnated pillules (1.5–3.9 x
107 particles/mL) and ULD-impregnated pillules (5.2–6.5 x
107 particles/mL and 8.9–9.1 x 107 particles/mL)
respectively in TNF-α (27 CH)- and IL-1β (27 CH)-impregnated pillules.
ULD-impregnated pillules were found to be more concentrated than vehicle for
bigger particles too. Particles diameter means for vehicle, TNF-α (27 CH) and
IL-1β (27 CH) samples were: 638 nm, 781 nm, and 729 nm (found in the second
measurement), and 684 nm, 723 nm, and 675 nm (detected in the third
measurement). Differences between vehicle and unitary medicines in bigger
particles distribution could be visualized, as well as for small particles, in
the 2 graphs shown in Figure 6
C and D.
Discussion
The results of the first part of the present study show that MI pillules impregnated
with ULD of 1 single pro-inflammatory cytokine at a time are not cytotoxic, and
exert anti-inflammatory properties in vitro.To evaluate potential cytotoxic effects, viability of human monocytes from 3 donors
exposed to vehicle, TNF-α (27 CH), or IL-1β (27 CH), in a wide range of pillules
concentrations (from 1.37 to 44 mM), have been assessed. On the basis of the
results, the 2 tested ULD unitary medicines are non-cytotoxic under the experimental
conditions and pillules concentrations tested (Figure 1).It is important to remind that pillules are composed of lactose and sucrose, sugars
that mammalian cells are not able to hydrolyze. Already in 1969, Cohn and his
collaborators observed how macrophages exposed to indigestible disaccharides are
uptaked by pinocytosis and stored in secondary lysosomes.[25] In the 90 s, more studies confirmed the findings,[26] and discovered that sucrose can activate autophagy.[27-29] The absence of cytotoxic effect has been proven at high sucrose concentration
(100 mM), as well as any effect in apoptosis, while the effects on gene expressions
for those proteins involved in autophagy via AKT/mTOR pathways, increase with time
of treatment, and in a dose-dependent manner, starting with 25 mM.[29]Because the disaccharides that compose the vehicle of MI medicines can produce
biological effects, activating autophagy or possible other pathways, in
vitro efficacy is often tested at the “safe” concentration of 11 mM[7,8] or into a “safe” range of concentrations, below that or equal to 22 mM.[6]In the light of the results, among the 3 pillules concentrations (5.5, 11 and 22 mM)
tested, 11 mM represents the good compromise and the suitable concentration to
evaluate the biological effects of MI medicines in vitro.TNF-α (27 CH) has exerted an anti-inflammatory effect reducing the secretion of TNF-α
in LPS-stimulated monocytes from 3 donors compared to vehicle by about 20% when
pillules were diluted at 11 mM (Figure 2B), and by about 10% at the concentration of 22 mM (Figure 2C). Doubling the
pillules concentration from 11 to 22 mM, the anti-inflammatory effect of ULD of
TNF-α slightly decreased, probably because the effect of sucrose and lactose
molecules at 22 mM have influenced and masked somehow the effect of the unitary MI
medicine. Reducing the concentration by half, from 11 mM to 5.5 mM, the
anti-inflammatory effect on TNF-α secretion disappeared, probably because the ULD of
TNF-α is too diluted in cell media (Figure 2A).In a very similar manner, in primary enriched monocytes exposed to LPS and treated
with ULD of IL-1β, levels of TNF-α secretion reduced compared to vehicle-treated
cells (Figure 2A-C). It
might be explained with the fact that the 2 cytokines are strongly linked by an
autocrine positive loop that keep upregulated the levels of pro-inflammatory
cytokines in monocytes, after LPS exposure,[30] and IL-1β (27 CH) probably acts via the inhibition of IL-1β.It is well-known that primary cells are more sensitive than a cell line, and maintain
much better the functions seen in vivo than a cell line. On the
other side, the inter-individual variability among donors could lead to
donor-dependent responses. For that reason, while the number of donors is low, and
no conclusions can be drawn, authors have represented singly each donor response for
the concentration of 11 mM in Supplementary Figure 1. It can be visualized that the
responses on the % of TNF-α reduction is very similar among the 3 donors, while
concentrations (expressed as pg/ml) of vehicle-treated cells are not equivalent
among donors.In order to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of the 2 unitary medicines also in
cell line, authors opted for PMA-differentiated THP-1 cell line, broadly used to
study monocytes/macrophages functions because of the biological similarity with
human peripheral blood mononuclear cell derived-monocytes and macrophages.[31,32] To establish this in vitro model, different cell culture
conditions were investigated: PMA-differentiated THP-1 were exposed to LPS (1
μg/mL), or IL-1β (10 ng/mL), or IL-1β (50 ng/mL) to induce inflammation. After 24
hours, cell medium was collected and TNF-α secretion was evaluated. The highest
levels of TNF-α secretion have been observed in LPS-stimulated cells, as shown in
Figure 3. Therefore, the
anti-inflammatory effect of the 2 unitary medicines has been evaluated in
PMA-differentiated THP-1 cell line after LPS exposure. Figure 4 shows the results of 3 independent
experiments and 3 pillules concentrations (5.5, 11 and 22 mM). At the lowest
concentration (5.5 mM), both tested ULD medicines have reduced the secretion of
TNF-α by about 20% compared to vehicle (Figure 4A). Doubling the concentration, from
5.5 to 11 mM, the response of ULD-treated cells compared to vehicle is approximately
the same (Figure 4B).
Doubling again, from 11 mM to 22 mM, the anti-inflammatory effect was reduced and
almost disappeared (Figure
4C), probably because the pillules concentration was too high and the
disaccharides of vehicle mask the effect of the ULD. The anti-inflammatory effect of
IL-1β (27 CH) on TNF-α secretion has been observed also in LPS-stimulated
PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells, as already mentioned, probably via the inhibition of
IL-1β. That hypothesis is sustained by data of 2 independent experiments made on
LPS-stimulated PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells, showing that the exposure to IL-1β
(27 CH) has reduced the secretion of IL-1ß by about 10% vs. vehicle
at 2 pillules concentrations, 11 and 22 mM (Supplementary Figure 2). While the data
are encouraging additional experiments, kinetic and molecular studies are necessary
to validate that hypothesis.To summarize, the findings of that first part of the study provide in
vitro evidence about the specific anti-inflammatory effect on TNF-α
secretion levels of TNF-α (27 CH), or IL-1β (27 CH), in comparison to the vehicle
control.To explore the possible involvement of small particles possibly containing starting
materials in the mode of action of ULD, the second objective of the study was to
investigate the presence of particles by using TRPS technique in diluted pillules
impregnated with TNF-α (27 CH) or IL-1β (27 CH). A proper control was included,
too.According to the EU Commission, the term nanomaterials, and nanoparticles, is
described as “a manufactured or natural material that possesses unbound, aggregated
or agglomerated particles where external dimensions are between 1–100 nm size range,”[33] while sub-micron particles have a diameter bigger than 100 nm and lower than,
or very closed, to 1 micron.TRPS, a very sensitive technique of nanotechnology, has been preferred to other
techniques, like nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), because TRPS is more suitable
for polydisperse system, as it can measure particle size distributions of a complex
polydisperse samples with high resolution and accuracy.[34] TRPS utilizes a size tunable pore, or nanopore, that is formed by
mechanically puncturing a micron sized hole into an elastic membrane. An
inconvenience of this technique is the issue of pore blockages due to particles that
are too large to fit through the pore, or particles that, due to their chemical
properties, are attracted to the pore surface and form aggregates within or around
the pore, causing an increase in time devoting to cleaning and washing the machine.
On the other side, the positive point of using a nanopore is that the concentration
is calculated into a defined size range, allowing the users to make sure there is no
over or under expression of particles.All items—vehicle, TNF-α (27 CH) and IL-1β (27 CH)—were equally managed and, just
before being analyzed, the solutions were prepared by diluting pillules in sterile
filtered (0.22 µm filter) PBS. The solutions were highly concentrated in those 2
disaccharides, sucrose and lactose, of which MI pillules are composed (380 mg/mL in
the first measure, or 190 mg/mL in the second and the third); however, this did not
influence the measurement. It could not be excluded that the sugar molecules have
formed aggregates of different size, making the interpretation of the results
complicated. For that reason, in order to highlight eventual differences in size and
particles concentrations between vehicle control and active samples, the authors
made the graphs shown in Figure
6. The use of ULD preparation could have solved that issue, nevertheless,
it would have been necessary to dilute the ethanol at least 1,000 times to avoid the
oxidation of the metallic silver-silver (Ag/AgCl) electrode.The first test performed with the NP200, which is rated for particles with a diameter
ranging from 80 to 500 nm, have revealed the presence of particles having a diameter
average of about 150–200 nm in all tested samples. While particles were also
detected in the vehicle control, the raw concentration was lower than the 2
concentrations observed in ULD-impregnated pillules (Figure 5A).During the detection, the nanopore was obstructed by particles bigger than 500 nm.
Consequently, the same items were analyzed by using the NP1000, rated for particles
having a diameter ranging from 490 to 2900 nm. In that way, bigger particles were
also detected in all tested samples, including vehicle. The particles diameter
average ranged from about 630 to 780 nm. As shown in Figure 5B, the lowest concentration was again
observed in diluted vehicle-impregnated pillules.In the light of the results of the second part, for the first time, the possibility
that MI based on ULD, may retain starting materials on impregnated pillules has been
discussed. Because glass bottles are used to prepare ULD, it can be speculated that
silica particles are formed during the SKP process, establishing stable
tridimensional structures with proteins.[35] Silica particles present in high potencies might be the carrier of the active
substances used in MI medicines. Then, those particles can be transferred to the
sugar pillules during the pillules impregnation, the last manufacturing
pharmaceutical process.Depending on the size, the mode of action could change: while very small particles,
characterized by a high bioavailability, can cross cellular membranes and induce
specific cell responses,[36] bigger particles could activate the immune system[37] inducing specific biological responses.Hormetic responses, already applied as a plausible mode of action for homeopathic
medicines, can be involved also in the mode of action of LD- and ULD-based MI
medicines.All the research carried out in the last years on high potencies and homeopathic
remedies, including the results discussed in the present study, raise still more
questions than answers. With the implementation of nanotechnology, novel knowledge,
and, on the other side, new difficulties have been added in that area of research.
In parallel, the research aimed at evaluating the biological effects in
vitro and in vivo must continue, to legitimate the
importance of that field of research, and to develop the potential of that
therapy.
Conclusions
Sub-micron particles possibly containing starting materials in a very low dose,
transferred on impregnated MI pillules, may exert their biologic effects in cells
and/or in organisms via hormesis. Aware about the limitation of the study, it is
important to highlight that, for the first time, the presence of particles, in a
wide range of size, has been disclosed in unitary-ULD-(27 CH)-impregnated pillules,
at concentrations that appeared higher than vehicle. That discovery has been
associated to a specific anti-inflammatory effect of the 2 unitary MI medicines in 2
different in vitro models. With this association, a materialistic
hypothesis based on the “surface monolayer hypothesis” and the “silica hypothesis”
has been proposed for MI. Nevertheless, authors are cautious in the conclusions
because the findings described in the study are still insufficient, and future
investigation may unveil unexpected results and different hypothesis.Other studies have previously detected the presence of NPs in commercial homeopathic
control solutions.[38,39] The principal interrogation about the possible contamination cannot be
ignored, and authors prefer to be cautious and do not jump to conclusions. More
evaluations of LD and ULD-impregnated pillules are compulsory and should use
different methods, like transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron
microscopy, and atomic force microscopy, together with the recent nanotechnology
techniques, in order to also characterize the nature and the chemical composition of
those particles present in MI pillules.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental_Material._Floris_et_al._revised_26.08.20 for Pro-Inflammatory
Cytokines at Ultra-Low Dose Exert Anti-Inflammatory Effect In Vitro: A Possible
Mode of Action Involving Sub-Micron Particles? by Ilaria Floris, Thorsten Rose,
Juan Antonio Collado Rojas, Kurt Appel, Camille Roesch and Beatrice Lejeune in
Dose-Response
Authors: Maria Del Mar Ferrà-Cañellas; Marta Munar-Bestard; Laura Garcia-Sureda; Beatrice Lejeune; Joana Maria Ramis; Marta Monjo Journal: J Periodontol Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 6.993