| Literature DB >> 33633461 |
Julius C Mwita1, Olayinka O Ogunleye2,3, Adesola Olalekan4,5, Aubrey C Kalungia6, Amanj Kurdi7,8, Zikria Saleem9, Jacqueline Sneddon10, Brian Godman7,11,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a concern with the growing use of antimicrobials across countries increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) rates. A key area within hospitals is their use for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI) with concerns with timing of the first dose, which can appreciably impact on effectiveness, as well as duration with extended prophylaxis common among low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This is a concern as extended duration increases utilization rates and AMR as well as adverse events. Consequently, there is a need to document issues of timing and duration of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) among LMICs together with potential ways forward to address current concerns.Entities:
Keywords: LMICs; antibiotic prophylaxis; duration of prophylaxis; quality indicators; surgical site infections; timing of prophylaxis
Year: 2021 PMID: 33633461 PMCID: PMC7901404 DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S253216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gen Med ISSN: 1178-7074
Published Rates Regarding Inappropriate Timing and Length of Administration of Antibiotics for SAP Among LMICs
| Country | Author and Year | Findings |
|---|---|---|
| Global PPS including many LMICs | Versporten et al, 2018 | Prolonged surgical prophylaxis, ie, >1 day was very common in all regions of the world The highest rates of extended prophylaxis were seen in Eastern Europe (LMICs) – 86.3% of patients |
| Botswana | Mwita et al, 2018 | Poor timing of prophylaxis was common, with only 15% of surgical patients receiving antibiotics pre-operatively, 58.3% post-surgery, and 26.8% of patients were not prescribed any antibiotics Prolonged surgical prophylaxis was common, with the mean (SD) duration of post-operative antibiotic use being 5 (2.6) days |
| Anand Paramadhas et al, 2019 | Extended prophylaxis (>1 day) was common. However, the extent among patients varied across hospital types:
Specialist – 66.7% of patients Tertiary – 100% of patients District – 90.3% of patients Primary – 100% of patients | |
| China | Yang et al, 2014 | Poor timing of the initial antibiotic dose, ie, outside of 30 minutes to 2 hours pre-incision, was common and seen in 67.1% of patients |
| Egypt | Talaat et al, 2014 | Poor timing and prolonged use of antibiotics was common among surgical patients in this PPS study:
72% of surgical patients did not receive their first dose of antibiotics within 2 hours before the incision 75% of patients received surgical prophylaxis for >24 hours |
| Saied et al, 2015 | Poor timing of SAP was common, with 92.3% of patients receiving the first dose of antibiotics outside of the agreed optimal time among three hospitals surveyed prior to educational and other interventions All hospitals surveyed showed a significant improvement in the optimal duration of SAP post-intervention – increasing from 3% of patients to 28% ( | |
| Ethiopia | Halawi et al, 2018 | 62.2% of patients received SAP longer than 1 hour pre-operatively 88.9% of patients received antimicrobial prophylaxis for greater than 24 hours after surgery |
| Ghana | Afriyie et al, 2020 | The duration of antibiotic use for SAP was generally more than 1 day – 69.0% in one hospital and 77.0% in another |
| Kenya | Ntumba et al, 2015 | 50% of patients in this study received post-operative antibiotics before an active intervention to address high rates |
| Opanga et al, 2017 | The duration of prophylaxis from the onset of surgery for patients with neurotrauma ranged from 1–3 days | |
| Okoth et al, 2018 | The average number of antibiotic doses in this PPS study for SAP was 19.1 doses | |
| India | Shankar, 2018 | All patients operated on on a particular day were administered antibiotics in the morning, irrespective of the timing of their surgery |
| Iran | Mahmoudi et al, 2019 | 92.1% of patients received SAP for more than 48 hours |
| Nigeria | Madubueze et al, 2015 | 57.6% of orthopedic surgeons gave antibiotic administration outside of 1 hour prior to surgery |
| Abubakar et al, 2018 | Timing of SAP was suboptimal, with 83.5% of patients administered their first dose outside of the 60 minute window prior to the first incision Prolonged SAP was seen in all patients with a mean duration of 8.7±1.0 days | |
| Oshikoya et al, 2019 | 97.7% of surgical patients received SAP However complete compliance to current guidelines on issues such as timing and duration of antibiotic use was suboptimal in 94.4% of patients | |
| Umeokonkwo et al, 2019 | Typically, prolonged use of antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis was common | |
| Fowotade et al, 2020 | 98.7% of all antibiotic prescriptions for SAP were given for more than 1 day | |
| Pakistan | Butt et al, 2019 | Pre-intervention – incorrect choice of antibiotic – 88.4% of occasions Duration of antibiotic use >60 hours – 42.9% of occasions |
| Saleem et al, 2019 | 97.4% of antibiotics prescribed for SAP in this PPS study in the Punjab region were given for more than 1 day | |
| Satti et al, 2019 | Duration of post-operative prophylaxis for SAP was suboptimal with 47.3% prescribed antibiotics for >24 hours | |
| Rwanda | Nkurunziza et al, 2019 | 92% of SAP patients received post-operative antibiotics for more than 3 days |
| Turkey | Ozgun et al, 2010 | There was prolonged use of antibiotics post-operatively in 35% of patients |
| Kaya et al, 2016 | Duration of antibiotic use for SAP was inappropriate in 29.1% of cases | |
| Karaali et al, 2019 | Surgical prophylaxis >24 hours – 60.2% of patients Antibiotic prescribed after discharge – 80.6% of patients |
Abbreviations: LMICs, lower- and middle-income countries; PPS, Point Prevalence Survey; SAP, surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.
Summary of Published Studies Across Countries Documenting the Impact of Interventions on Subsequent Timing and Length of Antibiotic Administration Among a Range of LMICs
| Author and Year | Intervention | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Gomez et al, 2006 | Education: Intervention based on education/training Engineering/Enforcement: Introduction of a protocol with an automatic stop for antimicrobial prophylaxis | Timing of prophylaxis improved from 55% to 88% of patients ( Adequate duration of prophylaxis increased from 44% to 55% of patients ( Overall expenditure decreased from US$10,679 per 1,000 patient-days to US$7,686 |
| Aitken et al, 2013 | Education and Engineering: Developing and implementing a SAP policy within the hospital | Appreciable improvement in lack of post-operative prophylactic antibiotics to 60% of patients in week 1 and 90% in week 6 following policy implementation ( Net reduction in the costs for IV antibiotics and associated consumables of approximately US$2.50/operation |
| Bozkurt et al, 2014 | Educational interventions including:
Series of meetings with physicians from each clinic organized by the Infection Control Committee Daily visits from the Infection Control Nurse as well as regular visits (twice per week) from an Infectious Diseases Control Specialist – more if compliance with agreed guidelines was low Observations regularly shared with the physicians | Use of appropriate antibiotics increased from 51% to 63.4% of cases Duration of use improved from 10.3% to 59.4% of cases Total cost of antibiotics in the medical units, surgical units, and ICUs decreased by 32.5%, 38.6%, and 11.1%, respectively |
| Yang et al, 2014 | Education and Engineering: Introduction of a Drug Rational Usage Guideline System (DRUGS) vs paper-based guidelines to enhance adherence to surgical prophylaxis guidelines | Timing of the initial dose improved from 32.9% instigated within 30 minutes to 2 hours pre-incision to 85.8% (statistically significant) post-intervention Average length of stay decreased from 7.00 days with paper-based guidelines to 2.55 days with DRUGS Average cost of antibiotics decreased from ¥3,481 with paper-based guidelines to ¥1,693 with DRUGS |
| Kim et al, 2015 | Education and Engineering:
Introduction of a surgical safety checklist in the operating theater over a week-long period Data collection team developed and randomly assigned to observe 30% of the surgical cases and collect process adherence measures, and feedback the findings | 12.7% increase in the appropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics |
| Ntumba et al, 2015 | Education and Engineering:
Local adaptation of guidelines Creation and tools for advocacy, training, and leadership around appropriate SAP | Patients receiving antibiotics post-operatively decreased from 50% to 26% Crude SSI rates significantly decreased from 9.3% to 5% of patients |
| Saied et al, 2015 | Education and Engineering:
2-day training curriculum On-the-job training provided to junior surgeons and residents Wall-mounted poster developed to remind prescribers of the optimal timing and duration of antibiotic administration for SAP Regular audit and feedback meetings orchestrated by the senior surgeon in the hospital (three of five participating hospitals) | The optimal timing of the first dose improved significantly in three hospitals, increasing from 6.7% to 38.7% ( All hospitals showed a significant rise in the optimal duration of surgical prophylaxis – overall increase of 3–28% ( |
| Brink et al, 2017 | Education and Engineering. Key activities driven by hospital pharmacists included:
Recording current SSI rates and developing a SAP “toolkit“ Testing and revising the SAP guidelines and toolkits at pilot sites prior to their launch at regional training and institutional workshops Obtaining consensus and endorsement from key professionals in the hospital through adapting and modifying guidelines where appropriate Choosing at least one or more surgical procedures to audit, including recording pre-intervention SAP practices and trends for the chosen surgeries Subsequently measure compliance to agreed four process measures over a 4-week period and feedback | Timely administration of antibiotics increased to 56.4% of surgical patients ( Antibiotic choice consistent with the guidelines increased to 95.9% of patients and the duration of prophylaxis was now appropriate among 93.9% of patients |
| Allegranzi et al, 2018 | Education and Engineering:
5 planned visits to each hospital during the study period supported by a range of tools Local teams identified key areas of concern with preventing SSIs to concentrate on through monitoring an agreed range of SAP indicators (six pre-identified ones including skin preparation and optimal timing of prophylaxis) Subsequent launch activities of tools and indicators and monitoring/feedback | Appropriate use of SAP improved from 12.8% (baseline) to 39.1% of patients ( Cumulative SSI incidence decreased from a baseline of 8.0% to 3.8% post-intervention ( |
| Shankar, 2018 | Education and Engineering:
Agreement among key stakeholders of the key elements of the WHO checklist to help reduce SSIs The designated checklist coordinator to confirm that the surgical team has completed its tasks before proceeding to the next steps | Prior to implementation all patients operated on on a particular day were administered antibiotics in the morning, irrespective of the timing of their surgery The correct practice of administration within 1–2 hours of the incision was seen following the intervention In addition, rectification of any concerns that appropriate surgical patients were not given SAP |
| Abubakar et al, 2019 | Education and Engineering:
Development and dissemination of an agreed departmental protocol for SAP, presented and agreed before adoption to enhance adoption rates Educational meetings with key clinicians to enhance uptake of agreed protocols Audit and feedback meetings using baseline data Reminders with wall mounted posters | Patients in the post-intervention period were 5.6-times more likely to receive SAP within 60 minutes before the incision vs pre-intervention ( Rate of redundant antibiotic prescriptions was reduced by 19.1% |
| Butt et al, 2019 | Education and Engineering:
Results of pre-intervention studies shared with physicians and nurses Subsequently general and specific problems regarding appropriate SAP were discussed with concerned personal and committees to enhance future adherence rates Training programs over 10–15 days were conducted by hospital pharmacists for physicians and nurses | Appropriateness of prophylactic antibiotics increased from 11.6% to 28% Only 33% of patients received extended prophylaxis, ie, >60 hours, down from 42.9% of patients pre-intervention ( Average length of hospitalization also fell to an average of 4.50 days post-intervention vs 5.4 days pre-intervention, further reducing costs |
| Karaali et al, 2019 | Education, Engineering, and Enforcement:
Local guidelines updated by two members of the infection control committee One general surgery team leader was appointed to be responsible for improving SAP as part of ASPs in their group Periodic training sessions were planned to supervise and regulate SAP by surgical team leaders It was decided that clean and clean–contaminated cases would not be given SAP for longer than 24 hours and that discharge prescriptions would not include antibiotics. However, no verbal or written sanctions were imposed for abuse | Compliance with the indication of surgical prophylaxis significantly increasing from 55.6% to 64.5% of patients ( Significant reduction in the extent of prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis, ie, beyond 24 hours, to just 7.5% post-intervention from 60.2% of patients pre-intervention ( Extent of antibiotic prescribing after discharge improved, ie. from 80.6% of patients pre-intervention down to 9.4% post-intervention ( However limited impact on the timing of first antibiotic dose – appropriate timing increasing from 81.9% of patients to 83.7% |
| Mahmoudi et al, 2019 | Education and Engineering:
Revising SAP guidelines following meetings between a clinical pharmacist and the surgical department, with senior clinical pharmacists delivering lectures about SAP to key members of the surgical departments Clinical pharmacists participating in ward rounds, attending recovery rooms, and communicating with surgeons when guidelines not followed Clinical pharmacists providing educational material on SAP to enhance future care Rationality of SAP continually evaluated during the perioperative period in accordance with agreed guidelines, with clinical pharmacists communicating any concerns directly to relevant physicians to improve future SAP | Rate of antibiotic prescribing beyond 48 hours appreciably improved to just 5.7% of patients, down from 92.1% of patients pre-intervention Appropriateness of antibiotic use increased to 91.4% of patients, up from 30.1% The mean cost of antibiotics decreased more than 11-fold and length of stay from an average of 5.14 days to 4.33 days ( |
Abbreviations: LMICs, lower- and middle-income countries; ASPs, antimicrobial stewardship programs; PPS, Point Prevalence Survey; SAP, surgical antibiotic prophylaxis; SSIs, surgical site infections.
Potential Strategies to Improve SAP Within Hospitals in LMICs
| Potential Strategies (if Not Being Enacted) |
|---|
Commitment to reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in hospitals as part of any ongoing/planned NAPs. This will involve resources being made available for instigating/implementing ASPs within hospitals with the appropriate use of SAP a key priority. This could be part of DTC or other activities As part of this:
Contact key universities within countries concerning current physician, pharmacy, and nurse training regarding antibiotics, AMR, ASPs, and SAP, and seek to address concerns where identified. Subsequently, monitor the situation Ascertain current knowledge of key stakeholders within hospitals regarding antibiotics, AMR, ASPs, and SAP, using both quantitative and qualitative approaches to guide future activities – which could include the need for further education and training Ascertain current SAP practices within hospitals, especially around key issues of timing and length of administration to guide future activities Use the findings from any research activities to develop additional educational and other programs where needed among all key stakeholder groups to further improve SAP as part of any NAP – recognizing that multiple interventions are likely to have greater success ( Develop or update current guidelines for SAP with key stakeholder groups and make these readily accessible and easy to use. This could include the availability of guidelines on smartphones and other electronic media where pertinent and possible As part of this, seek to introduce routine monitoring of antibiotic resistance patterns within hospitals to refine future SAP guidelines Instigate active communication and dissemination of any guidelines – key to enhancing adherence rates along with their ease of use. Subsequently, monitor SAP prescribing against current guidelines and NAPs, enhanced by auditing current practices based on WHO and other checklists Pertinent additional programs could include developing/refining QIs for the setting/country building on WHO checklists as well as other quality initiatives for the prevention of SSIs mindful of the requirements needed to develop robust quality indicators Potentially review funding for hospitals based on avoidable SSIs and their subsequent impact on morbidity, mortality, and costs Ascertain current knowledge and beliefs about antibiotics, SAP, and AMR as well as current SAP practices to ascertain gaps in knowledge/current practices. This includes attitudes and beliefs that lead to prolonged antibiotic administration for SAP Subsequently seek to instigate additional educational and other activities to address concerns with SAP where these exist, as well as help instigate ASPs within the hospital if these are lacking – recognizing that multiple interventions including educational interventions are typically more successful than single ones ( Seek to instigate/enhance CPD activities once healthcare professionals qualify with the help of relevant societies and the government Make sure current national guidelines are readily available and easily accessible in facilities and regularly updated as this is not always the case. This can include the availability of guidelines on smart phones In addition, encourage physicians through auditing and other practices to regularly consult national/hospital guidelines about optimal approaches to SAP including timing and duration where there are concerns, as well as monitor their performance. Work with microbiologists to regularly update resistance patterns within the hospital to help refine SAP guidelines if needed Encourage physicians through auditing and other practices to regularly consult national/hospital guidelines about optimal approaches to SAP including timing where there are concerns, as well as monitor their performance Use their knowledge to develop meaningful QIs for their specific setting to improve SAP in the future – building on checklists from the WHO and others together with key stakeholder groups – including other physicians, physician societies, nurse practitioners, hospital pharmacists, and health authorities Subsequently introduce agreed QIs, monitor prescribing against agreed targets, refine QIs if needed, as well as seek to instigate additional activities if needed to further enhance adherence to agreed QIs to improve SAP within the hospital Potentially seek to reward physicians for adherence to agreed SAP guidelines similar to activities with prescribing in a number of countries as well as achieving agreed QIs |
| d) Enforcement
Potential activities could surround stopping antimicrobial prescribing for SAP after 24 hours, with potential sanctions for abuse – similar to the situation for self-purchasing of antibiotics in community pharmacies Conduct activities within hospitals to ascertain current knowledge regarding antibiotic use, AMR, and ASPs given concerns that exist including concerns with hygiene, etc., leading to extended prophylaxis to prevent SSIs Advocate for additional educational activities among pharmacy students surrounding antibiotics, AMR, ASPs, and SAP where pertinent, as well as seek to instigate/enhance CPD activities among hospital pharmacies with the help of relevant pharmaceutical societies and the government Play an active role in the instigation/development of ASPs within hospitals as well as seek to actively research current antibiotic use for SAP and generally regarding antibiotic use including PPS studies. Educate key stakeholders regarding appropriate SAP and pertinent antibiotics including alternatives if drug shortages exist. Be involved with the development of pertinent QIs within the hospital to improve future SAP, as well as future monitoring and refining activities. This can include disseminating the findings from current antimicrobial resistance patterns within the hospital to refine future SAP guidelines if needed Help instigate ASPs and research into current SAP activities if not already enacted – including addressing current beliefs that lead to extended use of antibiotics for SAP post-surgery, eg, concerns with hygiene Help physicians and hospital pharmacists to improve the use of antibiotics for SAP within the hospital, including pertinent educational activities as well as the development/refinement/monitoring of QI activities Use the findings from any research/monitoring activities including those surrounding any developed QIs to further educate and co-ordinate activities within hospitals to improve future SAP. This can also include updated findings regarding resistance patterns within the hospital Continue to monitor the impact of any activities on the dose, timing, and length of administration of any antibiotics for SAP and introduce further campaigns if needed Can help with the local development of any SAP guidelines building on evidence-based principles and subsequently with the monitoring of adherence to SAP guidelines that are developed Potentially research the cost-effectiveness of different potential campaigns to improve SAP within hospitals, building on current information regarding the cost benefits of different activities to improving timings/reduce prolonged administration of antibiotics within hospitals – especially if increased resistance increases the costs of antibiotics used. This includes any QIs developed Instigate health education programs regarding the appropriate use of antibiotics and AMR within in schools, communities and patient groups where needed Potentially educate patients and households that extensive use of antibiotics is not necessary to reduce SSIs and can be counter-productive, including enhancing future AMR rates |
Abbreviations: AMR, antimicrobial resistance; ASPs, antimicrobial stewardship programs; CPD, continual professional development; DTCs, Drug and Therapeutic Committees; LMICs, lower- and middle-income countries; NAP, National Action Plans; PPS, Point Prevalence Survey; QIs, quality indicators; SAP, surgical antibiotic prophylaxis; WHO, World Health Organization.