Literature DB >> 33633322

Environmental impact of the cultivation of energy willow in Poland.

Zbigniew Kowalczyk1, Dariusz Kwaśniewski2.   

Abstract

The purpose of the work is to analyze the structure of the environmental impact of energy willow cultivation (Salix spp.) on plantations of various sizes, divided per materials and processes. The research covered 15 willow plantations, ranging from 0.31 ha to 12 ha, located in southern Poland. It was found, among others, that the so-called processes, i.e. the use of technical means of production, dominate the structure of the environmental impact (EI) related to the cultivation of energy willow, and that the cultivation of energy willow on larger plantations has a much lower environmental impact compared to cultivation on smaller plantations. Also, in the case of the environmental impact of processes, the largest environmental impact was recorded in the human health category, which is mainly associated with the consumption of fuel, i.e. diesel. It was determined, e.g., that the cultivation of energetic willow on larger plantations is characterized by a much lower environmental impact (as per the cultivation area), at approx. 108 Pt, compared to the cultivation on smaller plantations, where the value of the environmental impact is 168 Pt. A decisively dominant position in the structure of the environmental impact (EI), related to the cultivation of energy willow, is held by the so-called processes, i.e. the use of technical means of production. Their share in the total environmental impact decreases from 148.5 Pt in the group of the smallest plantations to 77.9 Pt in the group of the largest plantations.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33633322      PMCID: PMC7907244          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84120-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  12 in total

1.  Bird communities in future bioenergy landscapes of the Upper Midwest.

Authors:  Timothy D Meehan; Allen H Hurlbert; Claudio Gratton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change.

Authors:  Timothy Searchinger; Ralph Heimlich; R A Houghton; Fengxia Dong; Amani Elobeid; Jacinto Fabiosa; Simla Tokgoz; Dermot Hayes; Tun-Hsiang Yu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment.

Authors:  Göran Finnveden; Michael Z Hauschild; Tomas Ekvall; Jeroen Guinée; Reinout Heijungs; Stefanie Hellweg; Annette Koehler; David Pennington; Sangwon Suh
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?

Authors:  Michael Curran; Stefanie Hellweg; Jan Beck
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Energy efficiency of conventional, organic, and alternative cropping systems for food and fuel at a site in the U.S. Midwest.

Authors:  Ilya Gelfand; Sieglinde S Snapp; G Philip Robertson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 6.  Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions.

Authors:  James N Galloway; Alan R Townsend; Jan Willem Erisman; Mateete Bekunda; Zucong Cai; John R Freney; Luiz A Martinelli; Sybil P Seitzinger; Mark A Sutton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The water footprint of humanity.

Authors:  Arjen Y Hoekstra; Mesfin M Mekonnen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Characterization factors for terrestrial acidification at the global scale: a systematic analysis of spatial variability and uncertainty.

Authors:  Pierre-Olivier Roy; Ligia B Azevedo; Manuele Margni; Rosalie van Zelm; Louise Deschênes; Mark A J Huijbregts
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt.

Authors:  Joseph Fargione; Jason Hill; David Tilman; Stephen Polasky; Peter Hawthorne
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Life cycle assessment of maize cultivation and biomass utilization in northern Thailand.

Authors:  Titaporn Supasri; Norihiro Itsubo; Shabbir H Gheewala; Sate Sampattagul
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessment of the Possibilities for the Use of Selected Waste in Terms of Biogas Yield and Further Use of Its Digestate in Agriculture.

Authors:  Marcin Niemiec; Jakub Sikora; Anna Szeląg-Sikora; Zofia Gródek-Szostak; Monika Komorowska
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Automated Mobile Hot Mist Generator: A Quest for Effectiveness in Fruit Horticulture.

Authors:  Dmitriy Khort; Alexey Kutyrev; Nikolay Kiktev; Taras Hutsol; Szymon Glowacki; Maciej Kuboń; Tomasz Nurek; Anatolii Rud; Zofia Gródek-Szostak
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.