Literature DB >> 33633192

Maximizing avertable doses with a minimum amount of waste for remediation of land areas around typical single family houses after radioactive fallout based on Monte Carlo simulations.

Yvonne Hinrichsen1, Robert Finck2, Johan Martinsson2, Christopher Rääf2.   

Abstract

The uncontrolled release of long-lived radioactive substances from nuclear accidents can contaminate inhabited land areas. The removal of topsoil is an important method for reducing future radiation exposure but can also generate a large amount of waste that needs safe disposal. To the best of our knowledge, previous studies have determined the optimal depth of topsoil removal but not the size of the area designated for this measure. For this purpose, this study performed Monte Carlo simulations of hypothetical 137Cs surface contamination on various ground areas in a typical northern European suburban area. The goal was to study the size of the areas needed and amount of waste generated to achieve a certain relative and absolute dose reduction. The results showed that removing the topsoil from areas larger than 3000 m2 around the houses in the study neighbourhood results in only marginal reduction in radiation exposure. If, on average, 5 cm of topsoil is removed over 3000 m2, then 150 m3 of waste would be generated. However, in this scenario adjacent properties benefit from each other's decontamination, leading to a smaller amount of waste for a given reduction in future radiation exposure per inhabitant of these dwellings. Additionally, it was shown that topsoil removal over limited areas has a higher impact on the absolute dose reduction at an observation point inside or outside the houses with higher initial dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33633192      PMCID: PMC7907226          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84103-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  7 in total

1.  ICRP Publication 116. Conversion coefficients for radiological protection quantities for external radiation exposures.

Authors:  N Petoussi-Henss; W E Bolch; K F Eckerman; A Endo; N Hertel; J Hunt; M Pelliccioni; H Schlattl; M Zankl
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2010 Apr-Oct

2.  Reduction of external dose in a wet-contaminated housing area in the Bryansk Region, Russia.

Authors:  J Roed; K G Andersson; A N Barkovsky; C L Fogh; A S Mishine; A V Ponamarjov; V P Ramzaev
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Estimation of health hazards resulting from a radiological terrorist attack in a city.

Authors:  K G Andersson; T Mikkelsen; P Astrup; S Thykier-Nielsen; L H Jacobsen; L Schou-Jensen; S C Hoe; S P Nielsen
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Introducing the concept of the isodose for optimisation of decontamination activities in a radioactive fallout scenario.

Authors:  Y Hinrichsen; R Finck; C Rääf; K G Andersson
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 1.394

5.  Influence of the migration of radioactive contaminants in soil, resident occupancy, and variability in contamination on isodose lines for typical Northern European houses.

Authors:  Yvonne Hinrichsen; Robert Finck; Johan Martinsson; Christopher Rääf; Kasper Grann Andersson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of the accident process, radioactivity release and ground contamination between Chernobyl and Fukushima-1.

Authors:  Tetsuji Imanaka; Gohei Hayashi; Satoru Endo
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.724

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.