Literature DB >> 33632578

Not only intensive care unit workload and activities but also quality indicators are influenced by the COVID-19 epidemic.

P Reper1, S Delaere2, J J Yimbou2, S Labrique2, J Massaut2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33632578      PMCID: PMC7833313          DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.103008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs        ISSN: 0964-3397            Impact factor:   3.072


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor This retrospective case series includes adults with severe COVID-19 respiratory infection (Ruan et al., 2020, Lucchini et al., 2020) consecutively admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) between March 14 and April 30, 2020, at a regional hospital in Hainaut Province, one pandemic epicentre in Belgium. All COVID-19 diagnoses were confirmed through reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction assays performed on ICU admission (Guan et al., 2020). We compare the COVID-19 period data with two different registration periods before the COVID-19 outbreak. Most of the data collected confirmed significant differences between the COVID-19 period and the non COVID-19 periods (Table 1 ) without significant differences in populations characteristics. COVID-19 patients need more and longer aggressive support like artificial ventilation and renal replacement therapy, reflected by longer ICU stay and higher SAPS 3 and SOFA scores determined on day one (Ruan et al., 2020).
Table 1

Comparison of activity data and quality indicators during the COVID-19 period and two previous non COVID-19 periods.

ICU periodsCovid period
Non Covid periods
P value
202014 March–30 April201914 March–30 April2019/202014 March 2019 −13 March 2020
New ICU admissions3171549
Bed occupancy (%)83,566,571,6P < 0,05
Female n (%)11 (35,4)28 (39,4)201 (36,6)NS (p < 0,01)
Age (year)56/67/73 #59/69/77 #58/70/79 #NS (p < 0,01)
ICU LOS (days)2/6/15 #2/3/7 #1/3/6 #P < 0,05
SAPS 3 score on ICU admission46/57/63 #36/43/59 #36/46/60 #P < 0,05
SOFA score on ICU day 11/4/7 #0/2/5* #0/2/5° #*NS(p < 0,01)/°P < 0.05
ICU mortality (%)18.811.810.7NS (0,118)



Duration of Mechanical Ventilation (days)2/11/24 #1/2/9 #1/3/8 #P < 0.05
Use of Renal Replacement Therapy (% patients)3 (9,4)5 (6,6)27 (4,9)P < 0.05
NAS71/87/96 #50/59/72 #54/65/78 #P < 0.05



VAP (episodes/1000 days under artificial ventilation)40,74,97,5P < 0.05
CLABSI (episodes/1000 days with central venous catheter)2,800P < 0.05
ICU Readmission <48 h (%)3.200P < 0.05
Adverse events22779P < 0.05
SMR1.050.880.7P < 0.05

Comparison of ICU patients characteristics, use of artificial ventilatory support and renal replacement therapy, NAS results, mortality and ICU quality indicators in COVID-19 patients (COVID-19 period between 14 March and 30 April 2020) with non COVID-19 patients during the same period in 2019 (14 March and 30 April 2019) and during one year (between 14 March 2019 and 13 March 2020) registration.

Data are expressed as values for centiles 25, 50 (median) and 75 or number with absolute frequency (%). # Percentiles 25/50/75.

Statistical analysis compares the COVID-19 period data with two non COVID-19 periods. For SOFA score only statistical significance is different between the two non COVID periods compared with the COVID-19 period.

LOS (length of ICU stay); SAPS score (Simplify acute physiology score); SOFA score (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score); NAS (Nursing Activities Score); VAP (ventilator associated pneumonia); CLABSI (Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection); SMR (Standardised mortality ratio).

Comparison of activity data and quality indicators during the COVID-19 period and two previous non COVID-19 periods. Comparison of ICU patients characteristics, use of artificial ventilatory support and renal replacement therapy, NAS results, mortality and ICU quality indicators in COVID-19 patients (COVID-19 period between 14 March and 30 April 2020) with non COVID-19 patients during the same period in 2019 (14 March and 30 April 2019) and during one year (between 14 March 2019 and 13 March 2020) registration. Data are expressed as values for centiles 25, 50 (median) and 75 or number with absolute frequency (%). # Percentiles 25/50/75. Statistical analysis compares the COVID-19 period data with two non COVID-19 periods. For SOFA score only statistical significance is different between the two non COVID periods compared with the COVID-19 period. LOS (length of ICU stay); SAPS score (Simplify acute physiology score); SOFA score (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score); NAS (Nursing Activities Score); VAP (ventilator associated pneumonia); CLABSI (Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection); SMR (Standardised mortality ratio). The nursing workload in COVID-19 critically ill population assessed by the Nursing Activities Score (NAS) registration (Lucchini et al., 2020) not only reflects the higher workload in COVID-19 ICU but also the various complications (Guan et al., 2020, Ruan et al., 2020, Lucchini et al., 2020) developed by these critical patients. ICU quality indicators described by the Task Force of the European Society on Intensive Care Medicine (Rhodes et al., 2012) are therefore significantly different during the COVID-19 pandemic with higher readmission rate and more adverse events principally related to ventilatory support and vascular accesses. Nosocomial infection rate is significantly higher with more ventilator acquired infectious events (VAE) or ventilator acquired pneumonia (VAP) and catheter related infection (Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection – CLABSI) (Klompas, 2019 Aug). We did not observe a significantly higher absolute mortality but Standardised mortality ratio (SMR) was significantly influenced by the pandemic episode. COVID-19 infection leads to more dramatic situations with extreme workload for the ICU teams and higher complications rate. But COVID-19 outbreak also significantly influences ICU quality indicators particularly observed incidents, inhospital infections rates and SMR. Further studies are necessary to determine if this influence on quality indictors is related to the ICU management of this higher workload with limited resources or to the specificities of COVID-19 infection leading to more frequent complications in the most critical patients.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Data proceeding has been approved by the ethical committee of CHR Haute Senne (Dehout F, MD, president) Approval number: 16-06-20-01.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Authors' contributions

Every authors have participated to write this publication and approved the content.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  5 in total

1.  Prospectively defined indicators to improve the safety and quality of care for critically ill patients: a report from the Task Force on Safety and Quality of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

Authors:  A Rhodes; R P Moreno; E Azoulay; M Capuzzo; J D Chiche; J Eddleston; R Endacott; P Ferdinande; H Flaatten; B Guidet; R Kuhlen; C León-Gil; M C Martin Delgado; P G Metnitz; M Soares; C L Sprung; J F Timsit; A Valentin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Ventilator-Associated Events: What They Are and What They Are Not.

Authors:  Michael Klompas
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.258

3.  Nursing Activities Score is increased in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Alberto Lucchini; Marco Giani; Stefano Elli; Silvia Villa; Roberto Rona; Giuseppe Foti
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.072

4.  Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Qiurong Ruan; Kun Yang; Wenxia Wang; Lingyu Jiang; Jianxin Song
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Zheng-Yi Ni; Yu Hu; Wen-Hua Liang; Chun-Quan Ou; Jian-Xing He; Lei Liu; Hong Shan; Chun-Liang Lei; David S C Hui; Bin Du; Lan-Juan Li; Guang Zeng; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Ru-Chong Chen; Chun-Li Tang; Tao Wang; Ping-Yan Chen; Jie Xiang; Shi-Yue Li; Jin-Lin Wang; Zi-Jing Liang; Yi-Xiang Peng; Li Wei; Yong Liu; Ya-Hua Hu; Peng Peng; Jian-Ming Wang; Ji-Yang Liu; Zhong Chen; Gang Li; Zhi-Jian Zheng; Shao-Qin Qiu; Jie Luo; Chang-Jiang Ye; Shao-Yong Zhu; Nan-Shan Zhong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Healthcare-associated infections in adult intensive care unit patients: Changes in epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and contributions of new technologies.

Authors:  Stijn Blot; Etienne Ruppé; Stephan Harbarth; Karim Asehnoune; Garyphalia Poulakou; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Jordi Rello; Michael Klompas; Pieter Depuydt; Christian Eckmann; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Pedro Povoa; Lila Bouadma; Jean-Francois Timsit; Jean-Ralph Zahar
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.235

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.