| Literature DB >> 33631913 |
Jeongjun Lee1, Won-Sang Cho2, Roh Eul Yoo3, Dong Hyun Yoo3, Young Dae Cho3, Hyun-Seung Kang2, Jeong Eun Kim2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The fate of partially thrombosed intracranial aneurysms (PTIAs) is not well known after endovascular treatment. The authors aimed to analyze the treatment outcomes of PTIAs.Entities:
Keywords: Endovascular procedures; Intracranial aneurysm; Risk factors; Treatment outcome
Year: 2021 PMID: 33631913 PMCID: PMC8128530 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Neurosurg Soc ISSN: 1225-8245
Basal characteristics
| Value | |
|---|---|
| No. of aneurysms/patients | 27/27 |
| Female : male | 11 : 16 |
| Age (years) | 54.3±12.7 (11–73) |
| Presenting symptom | |
| Mass effect | 16 (59.3) |
| Headache or dizziness | 10 (37.0) |
| Asymptomatic finding | 6 (22.2) |
| Seizure | 3 (11.1) |
| Rupture | 6 (22.2) |
| Maximal diameter of aneurysm including thrombus (mm) | 26.0±12.7 (11.0–65.9) |
| Small-sized (<10 mm) | 0 |
| Large-sized (≥10 mm and <25 mm) | 14 (51.9) |
| Giant-sized (≥25 mm) | 13 (48.1) |
| Intraluminal aneurysm size (mm) | 11.7±5.3 (3.0–23.7) |
| Location | |
| Internal carotid artery | 8 (29.7) |
| Posterior communicating artery | 3 |
| Anterior communicating artery | 4 (14.8) |
| Middle cerebral artery | 4 (14.8) |
| Posterior circulation | 11 (40.7) |
| Posterior cerebral artery | 3 |
| Basilar artery | 3 |
| Vertebral artery | 5 |
| Wall calcification | 12 (44.4) |
| Partial | 6 |
| Whole | 6 |
| Thrombus signal intensity on T1 or TOF MR imaging | |
| High | 16 |
| Isogenous or low | 11 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation (range) or number (%) unless otherwise indicated. TOF : time-of-flight, MR : magnetic resonance
Angiographic results
| Total patient (n=27) | ILE (n=21) | PAO (n=6) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediately after initial treatment | |||
| Complete occlusion | 15 (55.6) | 10 (47.6) | 5 (83.3) |
| Residual neck | 11 (40.7) | 10 (47.6) | 1 (16.7) |
| Residual sac | 1 (3.7) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0.0) |
| At the last follow-up period | |||
| Complete occlusion | 11 (40.7) | 7 (33.3) | 4 (66.7) |
| Residual neck | 8 (29.6) | 7 (33.3) | 1 (16.7) |
| Residual sac | 8 (29.6) | 7 (33.3) | 1 (16.7) |
Values are presented as number of cases (%). ILE : intraluminal embolization, PAO : parent artery occlusion
Fig. 1.An approximately 20-mm-sized thrombosed aneurysm arising from the basilar artery on cerebral angiography (A) and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (B; arrow : basilar artery, dotted arrow : thrombus). After the initial stent-assisted intraluminal coil embolization, the coil mass and stent (dotted lines) were identified on fluoroscopy (C) and magnetic resonance imaging (D; arrow : basilar artery, dotted arrow : coil mass). During the follow-up, however, aneurysm recurrence was identified at 24 months, and aneurysm growth (approximately 28 mm) and the migration of the coil mass were definitely demonstrated at 30 months on fluoroscopy (E; dotted lines: stent, black arrows: coil migration from the stent) and magnetic resonance imaging (F; arrow : basilar artery, thick arrow : recurred sac, dotted line : migrating coil mass).
Fig. 2.An approximately 18-mm-sized thrombosed aneurysm at the left vertebral artery presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage on cerebral angiography (A) and computed tomography (B). Parent artery occlusion (the trapping of the proximal vertebral artery and intraluminal embolization) was performed (C). Coil mass (white arrow) and intra-aneurysmal thrombus (dotted black arrow) were identified on the 1-month follow-up time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (D). On the 14-month follow-up imaging, the thrombus was completely resolved, and a coil mass (white arrow) was observed (E).
Risk factor analysis of major recurrence after endovascular treatment in total cases
| Variable | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | ||
| Aneurysm size | 0.569 | 0.64 (0.14–2.94) |
| Lumen/whole size ratio | 0.236 | 15.85 (0.16–1536.93) |
| Location | 0.080 | 4.44 (0.84–23.58) |
| Ruptured aneurysm | 0.313 | 0.38 (0.06–2.52) |
| Treatment method | 0.077 | 8.13 (0.80–82.73) |
| Initial occlusion result | 0.346 | 0.48 (0.10–2.23) |
| Sex | 0.816 | 1.20 (0.26–5.59) |
| Age | 0.218 | 1.05 (0.97–1.13) |
| Follow-up period | 0.874 | 1.00 (0.98–1.02) |
| Wall without calcification | 0.017 | 8.25 (1.45–46.86) |
| Multivariate analysis | ||
| Location | 0.999 | |
| Treatment method | 0.999 | |
| Wall without calcification | 0.018 | 36.12 (1.85–705.18) |
OR : odds ratio, CI : confidence interval
Risk factor analysis of major recurrence after intraluminal embolization in 21 cases
| Variable | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | ||
| Aneurysm size | 0.965 | 1.04 (0.17–6.40) |
| Lumen/whole size ratio | 0.568 | 4.28 (0.03–630.62) |
| Location | 0.999 | |
| Ruptured aneurysm | 0.855 | 1.27 (0.10–16.81) |
| Initial occlusion result | 0.115 | 0.21 (0.03–1.47) |
| Use of stent | 0.335 | 0.32 (0.03–3.56) |
| Thrombus signal on MR | 0.920 | 1.11 (0.14–8.68) |
| Sex | 0.625 | 0.63 (0.11–3.71) |
| Age | 0.813 | 1.01 (0.92–1.11) |
| Follow-up period | 0.766 | 1.00 (0.98–1.02) |
| Wall without calcification | 0.012 | 23.33 (1.99–273.29) |
| Multivariate analysis | ||
| Initial occlusion result | 0.373 | 0.34 (0.03–3.65) |
| Wall without calcification | 0.021 | 19.02 (1.55–233.16) |
OR : odds ratio, CI : confidence interval, MR : magnetic resonance