Literature DB >> 33631812

Perspectives on improving light distribution and light use efficiency in crop canopies.

Rebecca A Slattery1, Donald R Ort1,2.   

Abstract

Plant stands in nature differ markedly from most seen in modern agriculture. In a dense mixed stand, plants must vie for resources, including light, for greater survival and fitness. Competitive advantages over surrounding plants improve fitness of the individual, thus maintaining the competitive traits in the gene pool. In contrast, monoculture crop production strives to increase output at the stand level and thus benefits from cooperation to increase yield of the community. In choosing plants with higher yields to propagate and grow for food, humans may have inadvertently selected the best competitors rather than the best cooperators. Here, we discuss how this selection for competitiveness has led to overinvestment in characteristics that increase light interception and, consequently, sub-optimal light use efficiency in crop fields that constrains yield improvement. Decades of crop canopy modeling research have provided potential strategies for improving light distribution in crop canopies, and we review the current progress of these strategies, including balancing light distribution through reducing pigment concentration. Based on recent research revealing red-shifted photosynthetic pigments in algae and photosynthetic bacteria, we also discuss potential strategies for optimizing light interception and use through introducing alternative pigment types in crops. These strategies for improving light distribution and expanding the wavelengths of light beyond those traditionally defined for photosynthesis in plant canopies may have large implications for improving crop yield and closing the yield gap. © American Society of Plant Biologists 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33631812      PMCID: PMC8133579          DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiaa006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  141 in total

1.  The flattening of the absorption spectrum of suspensions, as compared to that of solutions.

Authors:  L N DUYSENS
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1956-01

Review 2.  Protein phosphorylation in regulation of photosynthesis.

Authors:  J F Allen
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1992-01-22

3.  Antisense HEMA1 RNA expression inhibits heme and chlorophyll biosynthesis in arabidopsis.

Authors:  A M Kumar; D Söll
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Studies on reactions of illuminated chloroplasts. I. Mechanism of the reduction of oxygen and other Hill reagents.

Authors:  A H MEHLER
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1951-08       Impact factor: 4.013

5.  The role of water-water cycle in regulating the redox state of photosystem I under fluctuating light.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Ying-Jie Yang; Shi-Bao Zhang
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.991

6.  Phosphoglycolate production catalyzed by ribulose diphosphate carboxylase.

Authors:  G Bowes; W L Ogren; R H Hageman
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1971-11-05       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 7.  Photoinhibition of Photosystem II. Inactivation, protein damage and turnover.

Authors:  E M Aro; I Virgin; B Andersson
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1993-07-05

8.  Quenching in Arabidopsis thaliana mutants lacking monomeric antenna proteins of photosystem II.

Authors:  Yuliya Miloslavina; Silvia de Bianchi; Luca Dall'Osto; Roberto Bassi; Alfred R Holzwarth
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Thermostability and Photostability of Photosystem II in Leaves of the Chlorina-f2 Barley Mutant Deficient in Light-Harvesting Chlorophyll a/b Protein Complexes.

Authors:  M. Havaux; F. Tardy
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  A porphyrin pathway impairment is responsible for the phenotype of a dominant disease lesion mimic mutant of maize.

Authors:  G Hu; N Yalpani; S P Briggs; G S Johal
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.277

View more
  5 in total

1.  Agriculture futurist: Don Ort.

Authors:  Meisha Holloway-Phillips
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Light Interception, Photosynthetic Performance, and Yield of Oil Palm Interspecific OxG Hybrid (Elaeis oleifera (Kunth) Cortés x Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) under Three Planting Densities.

Authors:  Hernán Mauricio Romero; Stephany Guataquira; Diana Carolina Forero
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 3.  Integration of Light and Auxin Signaling in Shade Plants: From Mechanisms to Opportunities in Urban Agriculture.

Authors:  Xiulan Xie; Hao Cheng; Chenyang Hou; Maozhi Ren
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Here comes the sun: How optimization of photosynthetic light reactions can boost crop yields.

Authors:  Julia Walter; Johannes Kromdijk
Journal:  J Integr Plant Biol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 9.106

5.  Yield of summer maize hybrids with different growth duration determined by light and temperature resource use efficiency from silking to physiological maturity stage.

Authors:  Jiyu Zhao; Baizhao Ren; Bin Zhao; Peng Liu; Jiwang Zhang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.627

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.