| Literature DB >> 33631365 |
Na Liu1, Likang Qin2, Muhammad Mazhar3, Song Miao4.
Abstract
In the study on fermented acid rice soup (rice-acid) inoculated with L. paracasei H4-11 and K. marxianus L1-1, the concentrations of main flavor components on the third day of fermentation were significantly higher than those on the first day. Transcriptome analysis and proteome analysis based on RNA sequencing and 4D label-free proteomic techniques were combined to provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms of flavor characteristics and antioxidant activity of the two strains during the development of rice-acid. The key up-regulated genes and proteins in L. paracasei and K. marxianus L1-1, which were involved in flavor formation and antioxidant activity in rice-acid development, were different. The KEGG pathways involving the up-regulated genes and proteins in L. paracasei included starch and sucrose metabolism, pyruvate metabolism, amino sugar, and nucleotide sugar metabolism, and glycolysis/guconeogenesis. The KEGG pathways involving the up-regulated genes and proteins in K. marxianus L1-1 mainly included glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, TCA cycle, pyruvate metabolism, and other pathways related to antioxidant capacity. We successfully identified key genes and proteins associated with the metabolism and accumulation of flavor components and antioxidant activity. These findings provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms of flavor formation in co-cultivation with L. paracasei and K. marxianus. SIGNIFICANCE: It is anticipated that this study would provide us an insight into the mechanisms of flavor components accumulation and antioxidant activity of acid rice soup in China's minority areas. Importantly, this research provides the foundation of biological and chemical analysis for the application of the co-culture of L. paracasei H4-11 and K. marxianus in non-dairy products.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant activity; Flavor formation; Kluyveromyces marxianus; Lactobacillus paracasei; Mechanism
Year: 2021 PMID: 33631365 DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2021.104158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Proteomics ISSN: 1874-3919 Impact factor: 4.044