Literature DB >> 33630905

Tools for mapping multi-scale settlement patterns of building footprints: An introduction to the R package foot.

Warren C Jochem1, Andrew J Tatem1.   

Abstract

Spatial datasets of building footprint polygons are becoming more widely available and accessible for many areas in the world. These datasets are important inputs for a range of different analyses, such as understanding the development of cities, identifying areas at risk of disasters, and mapping the distribution of populations. The growth of high spatial resolution imagery and computing power is enabling automated procedures to extract and map building footprints for whole countries. These advances are enabling coverage of building footprint datasets for low and middle income countries which might lack other data on urban land uses. While spatially detailed, many building footprints lack information on structure type, local zoning, or land use, limiting their application. However, morphology metrics can be used to describe characteristics of size, shape, spacing, orientation and patterns of the structures and extract additional information which can be correlated with different structure and settlement types or neighbourhoods. We introduce the foot package, a new set of open-source tools in a flexible R package for calculating morphology metrics for building footprints and summarising them in different spatial scales and spatial representations. In particular our tools can create gridded (or raster) representations of morphology summary metrics which have not been widely supported previously. We demonstrate the tools by creating gridded morphology metrics from all building footprints in England, Scotland and Wales, and then use those layers in an unsupervised cluster analysis to derive a pattern-based settlement typology. We compare our mapped settlement types with two existing settlement classifications. The results suggest that building patterns can help distinguish different urban and rural types. However, intra-urban differences were not well-predicted by building morphology alone. More broadly, though, this case study demonstrates the potential of mapping settlement patterns in the absence of a housing census or other urban planning data.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33630905     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  3 in total

1.  High-resolution gridded estimates of population sociodemographics from the 2020 census in California.

Authors:  Nicholas J Depsky; Lara Cushing; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Geographical characterisation of British urban form and function using the spatial signatures framework.

Authors:  Martin Fleischmann; Daniel Arribas-Bel
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 8.501

3.  Mapping urban physical distancing constraints, sub-Saharan Africa: a case study from Kenya.

Authors:  Heather R Chamberlain; Peter M Macharia; Andrew J Tatem
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 13.831

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.