Martin Rypdal1, Veronika Rypdal2,3, Per Kristen Jakobsen1, Elinor Ytterstad1, Ola Løvsletten4, Claus Klingenberg2,3, Kristoffer Rypdal1. 1. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 2. Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 4. Department of Community Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To suppress the COVID-19 outbreak, the Norwegian government closed all schools on March 13, 2020. The kindergartens reopened on April 20, and the schools on April 27 and May 11 of 2020. The effect of these measures is largely unknown since the role of children in the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is still unclear. There are only a few studies of school closures as a separate intervention to other social distancing measures, and little research exists on the effect of school opening during a pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to model the effect of opening kindergartens and the schools in Norway in terms of a change in the reproduction number (R). A secondary objective was to assess if we can use the estimated R after school openings to infer the rates of transmission between children in schools. METHODS: We used an individual-based model (IBM) to assess the reopening of kindergartens and schools in two Norwegian cities, Oslo, the Norwegian capital, with a population of approximately 680 000, and Tromsø, which is the largest city in Northern Norway, with a population of approximately 75 000. The model uses demographic information and detailed data about the schools in both cities. We carried out an ensemble study to obtain robust results in spite of the considerable uncertainty that remains about the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: We found that reopening of Norwegian kindergartens and schools are associated with a change in R of 0.10 (95%CI 0.04-0.16) and 0.14 (95%CI 0.01-0.25) in the two cities under investigation if the in-school transmission rates for the SARS-CoV-2 virus are equal to what has previously been estimated for influenza pandemics. CONCLUSION: We found only a limited effect of reopening schools on the reproduction number, and we expect the same to hold true in other countries where nonpharmaceutical interventions have suppressed the pandemic. Consequently, current R-estimates are insufficiently accurate for determining the transmission rates in schools. For countries that have closed schools, planned interventions, such as the opening of selected schools, can be useful to infer general knowledge about children-to-children transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
BACKGROUND: To suppress the COVID-19 outbreak, the Norwegian government closed all schools on March 13, 2020. The kindergartens reopened on April 20, and the schools on April 27 and May 11 of 2020. The effect of these measures is largely unknown since the role of children in the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is still unclear. There are only a few studies of school closures as a separate intervention to other social distancing measures, and little research exists on the effect of school opening during a pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to model the effect of opening kindergartens and the schools in Norway in terms of a change in the reproduction number (R). A secondary objective was to assess if we can use the estimated R after school openings to infer the rates of transmission between children in schools. METHODS: We used an individual-based model (IBM) to assess the reopening of kindergartens and schools in two Norwegian cities, Oslo, the Norwegian capital, with a population of approximately 680 000, and Tromsø, which is the largest city in Northern Norway, with a population of approximately 75 000. The model uses demographic information and detailed data about the schools in both cities. We carried out an ensemble study to obtain robust results in spite of the considerable uncertainty that remains about the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: We found that reopening of Norwegian kindergartens and schools are associated with a change in R of 0.10 (95%CI 0.04-0.16) and 0.14 (95%CI 0.01-0.25) in the two cities under investigation if the in-school transmission rates for the SARS-CoV-2 virus are equal to what has previously been estimated for influenza pandemics. CONCLUSION: We found only a limited effect of reopening schools on the reproduction number, and we expect the same to hold true in other countries where nonpharmaceutical interventions have suppressed the pandemic. Consequently, current R-estimates are insufficiently accurate for determining the transmission rates in schools. For countries that have closed schools, planned interventions, such as the opening of selected schools, can be useful to infer general knowledge about children-to-children transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
Authors: Duygu Balcan; Vittoria Colizza; Bruno Gonçalves; Hao Hu; José J Ramasco; Alessandro Vespignani Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Bruce Y Lee; Shawn T Brown; Philip Cooley; Maggie A Potter; William D Wheaton; Ronald E Voorhees; Samuel Stebbins; John J Grefenstette; Shanta M Zimmer; Richard K Zimmerman; Tina-Marie Assi; Rachel R Bailey; Diane K Wagener; Donald S Burke Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2010 May-Jun
Authors: Russell M Viner; Simon J Russell; Helen Croker; Jessica Packer; Joseph Ward; Claire Stansfield; Oliver Mytton; Chris Bonell; Robert Booy Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2020-04-06
Authors: Robert Verity; Lucy C Okell; Ilaria Dorigatti; Peter Winskill; Charles Whittaker; Natsuko Imai; Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg; Hayley Thompson; Patrick G T Walker; Han Fu; Amy Dighe; Jamie T Griffin; Marc Baguelin; Sangeeta Bhatia; Adhiratha Boonyasiri; Anne Cori; Zulma Cucunubá; Rich FitzJohn; Katy Gaythorpe; Will Green; Arran Hamlet; Wes Hinsley; Daniel Laydon; Gemma Nedjati-Gilani; Steven Riley; Sabine van Elsland; Erik Volz; Haowei Wang; Yuanrong Wang; Xiaoyue Xi; Christl A Donnelly; Azra C Ghani; Neil M Ferguson Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Neil M Ferguson; Derek A T Cummings; Christophe Fraser; James C Cajka; Philip C Cooley; Donald S Burke Journal: Nature Date: 2006-04-26 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths; Cliff C Kerr; Robyn M Stuart; Dina Mistry; Daniel J Klein; Russell M Viner; Chris Bonell Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2020-08-03
Authors: Simon Cauchemez; Neil M Ferguson; Claude Wachtel; Anders Tegnell; Guillaume Saour; Ben Duncan; Angus Nicoll Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: R N Thompson; J E Stockwin; R D van Gaalen; J A Polonsky; Z N Kamvar; P A Demarsh; E Dahlqwist; S Li; E Miguel; T Jombart; J Lessler; S Cauchemez; A Cori Journal: Epidemics Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Shari Krishnaratne; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Michaela Coenen; Karin Geffert; Caroline Jung-Sievers; Carmen Klinger; Suzie Kratzer; Hannah Littlecott; Ani Movsisyan; Julia E Rabe; Eva Rehfuess; Kerstin Sell; Brigitte Strahwald; Jan M Stratil; Stephan Voss; Katharina Wabnitz; Jacob Burns Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-12-17
Authors: Johannes Forster; Andrea Streng; Paul Rudolph; Viktoria Rücker; Julia Wallstabe; Sandra Timme; Franziska Pietsch; Katrin Hartmann; Maike Krauthausen; Julia Schmidt; Timo Ludwig; David Gierszewski; Thomas Jans; Geraldine Engels; Benedikt Weißbrich; Marcel Romanos; Lars Dölken; Peter Heuschmann; Christoph Härtel; Ildikó Gágyor; Marc Thilo Figge; Oliver Kurzai; Johannes Liese Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-01-04