Pasha Normahani1,2, Sepideh Poushpas1, Mays Alaa1, Vassiliki Bravis3,4, Viknesh Sounderajah1, Mohammed Aslam1,2, Usman Jaffer1,2. 1. Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. Diabetic Foot Unit, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom. 4. Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We compared the diagnostic performance of a novel point-of-care duplex ultrasound test (podiatry ankle duplex scan; PAD-scan) against commonly used bedside tests for the detection of PAD in diabetes. BACKGROUND: PAD is a major risk factor for diabetic foot ulceration and amputation. Its diagnosis is fundamental though challenging. Although a variety of bedside tests are available, there is no agreement as to which is the most useful. PAD-scan may be advantageous over current tests as it allows for vessel visualization and more accurate arterial waveform assessment. However, its accuracy has not been previously evaluated. METHODS: From March to October 2019, we recruited 305 patients from 2 diabetic foot clinics. The diagnostic performance of ankle-brachial pressure index, toe-brachial pressure index, transcutaneous pressure of oxygen, pulse palpation, and ankle waveform assessment using PAD-scan and Doppler devices (audible and visual waveform assessment) were assessed. The reference test was a full lower limb duplex ultrasound. RESULTS: Based on the reference test, 202 (66.2%) patients had evidence of PAD. PAD-scan had a significantly higher sensitivity [95%, confidence interval (CI) 90%-97%) as compared to all other tests. Particularly low sensitivities were seen with pulse palpation (43%, CI 36%-50%) and transcutaneous pressure of oxygen (31%, CI 24%-38%). PAD-scan had a lower specificity (77%, CI 67%-84%) compared to toe-brachial pressure index (86%, CI 78%-93%; P < 0.001), but not statistically different when compared to all other tests. CONCLUSIONS: PAD-scan has superior diagnostic utility and is a valid first line investigation.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the diagnostic performance of a novel point-of-care duplex ultrasound test (podiatry ankle duplex scan; PAD-scan) against commonly used bedside tests for the detection of PAD in diabetes. BACKGROUND: PAD is a major risk factor for diabetic foot ulceration and amputation. Its diagnosis is fundamental though challenging. Although a variety of bedside tests are available, there is no agreement as to which is the most useful. PAD-scan may be advantageous over current tests as it allows for vessel visualization and more accurate arterial waveform assessment. However, its accuracy has not been previously evaluated. METHODS: From March to October 2019, we recruited 305 patients from 2 diabetic foot clinics. The diagnostic performance of ankle-brachial pressure index, toe-brachial pressure index, transcutaneous pressure of oxygen, pulse palpation, and ankle waveform assessment using PAD-scan and Doppler devices (audible and visual waveform assessment) were assessed. The reference test was a full lower limb duplex ultrasound. RESULTS: Based on the reference test, 202 (66.2%) patients had evidence of PAD. PAD-scan had a significantly higher sensitivity [95%, confidence interval (CI) 90%-97%) as compared to all other tests. Particularly low sensitivities were seen with pulse palpation (43%, CI 36%-50%) and transcutaneous pressure of oxygen (31%, CI 24%-38%). PAD-scan had a lower specificity (77%, CI 67%-84%) compared to toe-brachial pressure index (86%, CI 78%-93%; P < 0.001), but not statistically different when compared to all other tests. CONCLUSIONS: PAD-scan has superior diagnostic utility and is a valid first line investigation.