Literature DB >> 33629277

The effect of the interaction between fall-related self-efficacy and gait function on the occurrence of falls in community-dwelling older people.

Naoto Kamide1,2, Haruhiko Sato3,4, Miki Sakamoto3,4, Yoshitaka Shiba3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fall-related self-efficacy and gait function are known to be associated. However, whether the interaction between fall-related self-efficacy and gait function affects future falls has not been investigated. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the interaction between fall-related self-efficacy and spatiotemporal gait parameters on the occurrence of falls in community-dwelling older people.
METHODS: A total of 265 elderly persons (age ≥ 65 years) living independently in the community were recruited. For gait function, spatiotemporal gait parameters at usual and maximum effort paces were measured using a 2.4-m walkway system with embedded pressure sensors. Furthermore, changes in gait parameters between usual and maximum paces were calculated (Δgait parameters). Fall-related self-efficacy was assessed using the short version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International (Short FES-I). The occurrence of falls was prospectively investigated 6 months later. The effect of the interaction between short FES-I and gait parameters on falls was analyzed using logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounding factors.
RESULTS: Several gait parameters were significantly different by self-efficacy level. As for the effect of the interaction of fall-related self-efficacy and gait parameters on falls, smaller Δgait parameters in those with high efficacy were associated with higher odds ratios of falls, whereas Δgait parameters in those with low efficacy were not associated with falls. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: The interaction between fall-related self-efficacy and gait function appeared to affect future falls. Assessments combining fall-related self-efficacy and gait function may improve the accuracy of prediction of future falls.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aged; Fall-related self-efficacy; Falls; Gait; Japanese

Year:  2021        PMID: 33629277     DOI: 10.1007/s40520-021-01807-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  31 in total

Review 1.  Measuring the psychological outcomes of falling: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ellen C Jørstad; Klaus Hauer; Clemens Becker; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Fall-risk evaluation and management: challenges in adopting geriatric care practices.

Authors:  Mary E Tinetti; Catherine Gordon; Ellen Sogolow; Pauline Lapin; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2006-12

3.  Increased concern is protective for falls in Chinese older people: the chopstix fall risk study.

Authors:  Marcella M S Kwan; William W N Tsang; Sang-I Lin; Mark Greenaway; Jacqueline C T Close; Stephen R Lord
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 4.  Factors associated with fear of falling and associated activity restriction in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael D Denkinger; Albert Lukas; Thorsten Nikolaus; Klaus Hauer
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 4.105

5.  Concern About Falling Is Associated With Gait Speed, Independently From Physical and Cognitive Function.

Authors:  Kimberley S van Schooten; Ellen Freiberger; Myriam Sillevis Smitt; Veronika Keppner; Cornel Sieber; Stephen R Lord; Kim Delbaere
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2019-08-01

6.  Gait velocity as a single predictor of adverse events in healthy seniors aged 75 years and older.

Authors:  Manuel Montero-Odasso; Marcelo Schapira; Enrique R Soriano; Miguel Varela; Roberto Kaplan; Luis A Camera; L Marcelo Mayorga
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  The Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). A comprehensive longitudinal validation study.

Authors:  Kim Delbaere; Jacqueline C T Close; A Stefanie Mikolaizak; Perminder S Sachdev; Henry Brodaty; Stephen R Lord
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 10.668

8.  Quantitative gait markers and incident fall risk in older adults.

Authors:  Joe Verghese; Roee Holtzer; Richard B Lipton; Cuiling Wang
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 9.  Single and dual task tests of gait speed are equivalent in the prediction of falls in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jasmine C Menant; Daniel Schoene; Mina Sarofim; Stephen R Lord
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 10.895

10.  Fall-related efficacy is a useful and independent index to detect fall risk in Japanese community-dwelling older people: a 1-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Naoto Kamide; Yoshitaka Shiba; Miki Sakamoto; Haruhiko Sato; Akie Kawamura
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.921

View more
  3 in total

1.  Subjective Age and Falls in Older Age: Evidence From Two Longitudinal Cohorts.

Authors:  Hervé Fundenberger; Yannick Stephan; Antonio Terracciano; Caroline Dupré; Bienvenu Bongue; David Hupin; Nathalie Barth; Brice Canada
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Gait characteristics in community-dwelling older persons with low skeletal muscle mass and low physical performance.

Authors:  Yari Longobucco; Sebastian Krumpoch; Fulvio Lauretani; Valentina Angileri; Cornel Sieber; Emanuele Marzetti; Riccardo Calvani; Antonio Cherubini; Francesco Landi; Roberto Bernabei; Ellen Freiberger; Marcello Maggio
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.481

3.  Movement-Specific Reinvestment in Older People Explains Past Falls and Predicts Future Error-Prone Movements.

Authors:  Lisa Musculus; Noel Kinrade; Sylvain Laborde; Melina Gleißert; Miriam Streich; Babett Helen Lobinger
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.